9550 graphics card, strong, or X550 graphics card strong

X550 is almost the PCIe version of 9550, and the performance is basically the same as the core frequency and the memory frequency, but because the X550 technology is advanced, most of the X550 core frequency and memory frequency are much higher than the 9550, so the X550 is generally much stronger than the 9550 performance.

The X550 is a lot more powerful than the 9550.

ATI graphics card.

Graphics chip Radeon X550

The production process is micron.

Graphics card frequency. Core frequency 400MHzMHz

The memory frequency is 500MHzMHz

Video memory specifications. Memory type DDR

Video memory capacity 256MB

The memory bit width is 128 bits

The memory speed is 4ns

Memory particle TSOP package.

The maximum resolution is 2048*1536

Graphics card cooling. Heat dissipation method: cooling fan.

Graphics card interface. Interface type PCI-E 16x

Physical characteristics. 3d apimicrosoft directx

The core architecture is almost the same, it is almost the same under the same video memory configuration, the 9550 is the AGP interface, and the X550 can be regarded as the PCI-E version of the 9550.

The x550 is a bit stronger; But this graphics card generates more heat; Especially those that use heat pipes for passive heat dissipation. My current company computer is a heat pipe X550, which is still hot when the chassis is opened.

X550 is much better After all, it has been 2 generations apart.

x550 is a card that came out 2 years after 9550 was released.

The architecture of the 5200 itself lags behind the 9550. The 5200 can be considered the DX440 version of the MX9. Aside from hardware support for the DX9, its performance is similar to that of the MX440.

The 9550 is a 3rd generation more advanced architecture than the MX440, and its resource utilization is much higher than that of the 5200 with the same bandwidth and video memory. 5200 3DMark2001 is basically 4000 5000 points, while 9550 is above 8000. 3DMark2001 is based on DX8 tests, and the 9550 is much stronger than the 5200.

In DX9-based testing, the gap between the two is even greater because the 5200's architecture is more unadaptable.

The architecture of the 5200 is much worse than that of the 9550 (only two of the four render pipelines of the 5200 support DX9, and the other two only support DX7 - the same pipeline as the MX440, which is the main basis for thinking that 5200 is the DX9 version of the MX440). Whether it is DX performance or OpenGL performance, the 9550 is much stronger than the 5200. Although the 5200 supports DX9, it can't actually run DX9 games at all.

Hehe 9550 is 128m

128bit of video memory.

is the myth of AGP graphics cards

How can 5200 be compared to 9550.

There is indeed a gap ...

9550 is a good choice if you can, if you want to change it with 5200 now, then don't consider 9550.

You can pan for 2 lots of x800, or 6600gt, 6800gs.