There will be no ultimate theory in science?

Of course, such an ultimate theory cannot exist, and I believe that even if human civilization had always existed, such a theory would not have been born.

Rationale: The so-called ultimate theory is an equation that encompasses everything in the universe. Anything that exists in the universe, what it is, where it is, what it looks like, how it will ......And so on and so forth, you can use this equation to solve it.

Do you think this is possible? What about the "uncertainty principle" in quantum theory? Even if you find such an equation, do you think that people are still human beings at that time?

They are exercising God's duty.

One more thing to add.

Scientists have obtained faster-than-light, 1 is high-energy particles in water.

2 was discovered indirectly in cosmic observations.

Of course, the so-called unity, in fact, is not valid, and the ultimate theory will be, but it is only in the hands of God, and we have not stolen it yet. String theory, M theory is just a hypothesis, relativity theory and quantum mechanics are contradictory theories, but everyone sees that they have a good approximation when solving problems, and he is absolutely correct, of course, if the closer to the accurate value, the more inaccurate, you should know this, so you still have a lot of potential for development.

People always try to lift the last veil of nature, but she always presents us with another picture of the unknown, don't think about any ultimate theory, just like the speed of light, an object with mass can only approach it infinitely, and can never reach or even surpass, science is the same, we can only explore step by step, and it is impossible to fully reveal it.

Human cognition is a process of continuous learning, continuous improvement and continuous progress, and the material world is constantly changing. So from this point of view, there is no question of the "ultimate".

From Aristotle onwards, he thought that he had discovered the ultimate theory, and that he only needed to change something. So far, there has been no progress at all. I don't think there's any ultimate theory, and even if there is, I don't think humans can discover it.

Far from it.

Even the most established field of classical mechanics has a lot of unanswered questions. For example, the problem of turbulence in fluid mechanics. The main thing is that if the physical laws are linear, they are easy to do, and if they are not linear, they are finished.

What dark matter, dark energy, black holes, there is no convincing explanation.

The description of biological systems is basically qualitative. Because the biological system is a complex system, there is no good mathematical model to describe it.

When you say physics, you mean basic theoretical physics. I feel that there are still many problems that have not been resolved.

Even if the unification of forces is achieved, it only provides a tool for human beings to solve problems.

We need this tool to solve a lot of problems, and there are still many unsolved mysteries in the galaxy waiting to be solved!

I think Einstein's unified field theory is the ultimate theory.

And the ultimate theory is not so simple, and it will be a few centuries to go.

m stands for "magic", "membrane", "matrix", etc., and I think M stands for "fuzzy" more appropriately, because no one can prove it, only inference.

In every age, there are people who think that their theories are the best, the ultimate, the omnipotent.

The ultimate theory of science: everything comes into being from nothing, and then from something to nothing. It is the ultimate god who makes this rule.

The reason for the occurrence of gravitational force (brief description): When the high-energy particles moving in the universe pass through matter (celestial bodies or particles), part of them are intercepted and absorbed to form a weak energy region (Einstein's space-time curvature), which is the gravitational range mv2=e=mv2 (the formula of the law of conservation of energy conversion).

The "ultimate problem of science" is the general theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, which are irreconcilable, and in the great research process of successive scientists, quantum mechanics can explain many previous doubts, but it cannot make a reasonable explanation for gravity, so the two pillars are irreconcilable.

Because this ultimate theory of science will produce a very big contradiction between the relativity theory and quantum science of physics, and this contradiction itself has not been solved in the current physics, so there is no way to reconcile it at all.

The ultimate theory of science is falsifiable, so there will be no precise definition, so it is irreconcilable.

I don't think there's an ultimate theory, and there are too many unknown worlds for human beings. You can only keep exploring.

The ultimate theory of science is closely related to the other two branches, but there are also differences.

Truth is relative and limited, and it is constantly evolving with the development of scientific cognition, and there will be no immutable absolute truth. The plate theory is certainly not the ultimate theory of geoscience, but only a stage of understanding in the understanding of earth science, it can be considered that Wegener's theory at that time well expounded the influence of internal dynamics on the earth's crustal movement and lithosphere evolution, and provided a credible comparative research theory for the international comparison of complex geological structures, stratigraphic profiles, paleontological evolution, etc., on a global scale, and had a reasonable theoretical solution to the relationship between global plate activity and volcanic activity, and so on. However, in the future, when the theory of plate theory encounters a bottleneck in further explaining the problems of earth science, new theories will inevitably be produced to revise or replace it, and the theory of human cognition is a process of continuous negation and improvement from negation, which is in line with the scientific development concept of dialectical materialism and historical materialism.

The earth says that the earth's crust has been moving for a long time.

You see: the Australian land mass first settled in the Red Sea, then in the Arabian Sea, then in the Bay of Bengal, and in the future, it will also settle in the Gulf of Tonkin - the South China Sea - the Taiwan Strait ,...

In the Southern Hemisphere, from west to east, the Pacific crust pattern is propelled – clusters – families – clusters ,......Not for anything, just to clean up the broken mountains and rivers for the Eurasian continent, forever - forever ,......

Can socialism be realized? There are no absolutes in everything, so I don't dare to say that it can't be achieved 100 percent, but what is human beings? The premise of socialism is that material can be abundant and good.

The good material life determines that human beings can be equal. This is materialism (a philosophical thought, as opposed to politicism). However, there are only so many resources on the earth, and if we want to be equal, we can only be poor, not rich.

Since the material cannot reach a very high level, then socialism is very difficult to achieve. People will start to fight for material things, start to squeeze, and this is capitalism.

Therefore, if we look at the reality, the current state and society are desperately trying to satisfy their own interests, this is politics, and this is reality. It is impossible to get everyone to the level of Europe and the United States. There are always very few people, and ordinary people are the most.

As for your second question, as I said above, there are no absolutes in everything.

Cosmology is exploring this question, and the theory of the origin of the universe is now more popular in the Great Universe.

The big bang is just a doctrine, an assumption based on astronomical observations. About 15 billion years ago, all the matter in the universe was highly dense at one point, with extremely high temperatures, so there was a huge **. After the big **, matter began to expand outward, forming the universe we see today.

The whole process of the great ** is complex, and now we can only describe the history of the development of the universe in the past on the basis of theoretical research. In these 15 billion years, galaxy clusters, galaxies, our Milky Way, stars, solar systems, planets, moons, etc. have been born. All the celestial bodies and cosmic matter that we see and cannot see now form the present universe have formed the present cosmic form, and it is in this cosmic evolution that human beings were born.

You're right, it's a constant cycle of nothing-have-nothing. The universe is like bubbles in boiling water, constantly generating and emptying.

There are only four kinds of interaction forces between microscopic particles found in the physical world, which are gravitational force, electromagnetic force, strong interaction force, and weak interaction force. All phenomena in the universe can be explained by these four forces. As a result, it is desirable to have a grand unified theory, that is, a physical theory or model that attempts to establish the same set of equations to describe all particles and the four forces.

Such a theory is sometimes referred to as the ultimate theory, or the principle of all things, the theory of all things.

The pursuit of science is endless, the complete understanding of the universe will be a long-lasting process, and the development of science will not end[br] In the nineteenth century, no one said: "The edifice of physics is completed!" However, it didn't take long for real modern physics to begin--- with the advent of relativity and quantum physics, and many people thought that the unification of the two theories would bring the development of theoretical physics to an end!

That's just the view that people make based on the epistemic view of the two theories, just as the nineteenth century people thought that physics has come to an end, and at the same time, the two theories have different degrees of flaws, and even if they are unified, they may not be able to explain the nature of the world, so we still have a long way to go in order to truly understand the world and the universe.

Modern physics is based on the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, two theoretical systems that have been developed for a hundred years and have been widely used. However, this does not mean that the theory of relativity and quantum mechanics are already perfect theories, and modern physics is still far from the end of physics.

The theory of relativity has achieved great success in describing the effects of gravity, and various gravitational phenomena in the universe are fully consistent with the predictions of the theory of relativity. On the other hand. Quantum mechanics is very successful in describing the microscopic field, and the Standard Model of particle physics can describe electromagnetic, weak, and strong nuclear forces, and various phenomena in particle accelerators are consistent with the predictions of this theory.

Both relativity and quantum mechanics are very valid theories because they can not only describe the phenomena that have been observed, but also make accurate predictions about unknown phenomena. But the problem is that the two theories are incompatible, and gravity seems to be incompatible with the other three fundamental forces.

In the eyes of physicists, there must be a more fundamental theory than relativity and quantum mechanics—the Grand Unified Theory, which describes all four fundamental forces at the same time. When describing gravity, the theory of relativity is a good approximation of the Grand Unified Theory. When it comes to describing the behavior of microscopic particles, quantum mechanics is a good approximation of the Grand Unified Theory.

Within a certain range of applications, both relativity and quantum mechanics are valid theories. But outside the scope of application, for example, the singularity at the center of the black hole, the first moment of the birth of the universe, only the grand unified theory can give an accurate description. At present, the direction of development of theoretical physics is still unclear, and it is still very early to realize the ultimate theory.

Even, theoretical physics may not have an end at all.

There is no end to the study of physics. Infinite research is possible.

The end is still far away, there are many unsolved mysteries still waiting to be solved, and now some problems can never be solved.

The study of physics still takes a long time, and it is difficult to study the end.

The end is still far away, because there is still a lot we don't understand in the field of physics.

This is a very, far distance, and the Earth has not yet studied it thoroughly.

If we want to talk about the end of physics, the grand unified theory is the stage end of physics. The theory of relativity has had great success in describing the gravitational effect.

It's still a long way off, because many of the physical puzzles have not yet been solved.

The grand unified theory is the phased end point of physics.

The grand unified theory is the phased end point of physics. The theory of relativity has had great success in describing the gravitational effect.

1 All string theory is the correct mathematical theory. The reason why it is not a physical theory is because it has not yet been proven, but if it is verified in the future, it will change from mathematical to physical theory. All physical theories in history have been based on mathematics, and the emergence of string theory provides a mathematical basis for us to discover correct physical theories in the future, and in this sense, I think string theory is ultimately correct.

Just as classical physics opened the door to the physical world for modern physics. For us, no matter what the final theory may be, we should understand this string theory now, because it may be a door to the right path.

It is writing theories that can explain many physical phenomena. But. , as long as he is not the ultimate theory that can describe everything in the universe.

It's not perfect. Just like classical mechanics requires special relativity to correct. Special relativity needs to be modified by general relativity.

Classical general relativity requires quantum general relativity to be modified. There may also be theories to modify string theory. And it's already beginning to see the beginning.

Like what. High-dimensional space. M theory, quantum gravitational theory, superstring theory.

Upstairs in Chinese English, the grammar is wrong.