Can the purchase of large scale instruments and equipment be entrusted with bidding?

Of course. There are two organizational forms for the purchaser to purchase equipment, that is, it can organize the procurement by itself or entrust the procurement, which is the power of the purchaser.

Procurement, there are many ways, such as bidding, competitive negotiation, competitive negotiation, inquiry, etc.

If the purchaser's ability to organize procurement by itself is insufficient, or there are other more important things, it is recommended to entrust procurement, which is also the way adopted by many units.

For the testing industry, the market for the sharing economy is also very large. At present, the distribution of instrument resources in China's testing industry is unbalanced. Due to the limited financial strength of small and medium-sized testing enterprises, it is difficult to purchase advanced equipment and equipment required for R&D and innovation, resulting in limited testing capabilities of small and medium-sized enterprises and institutions with strong funds.

Enterprises have varying degrees of idleness and waste. According to reports, the idle rate of domestic experimental instruments and equipment is as high as 20, and the annual effective working hours of the instrument are less than that of standard machines, of which the instruments are less than 1 2 standard machines. In order to meet the testing needs of small and medium-sized micro testing enterprises and some laboratories, the testing industry has gradually given birth to the "instrument sharing" and "instrument rental" models.

Instrument sharing refers to the purchase of certain equipment and equipment by research institutions, enterprises or individuals in a certain region, and other enterprises or individuals in the region do not need to purchase repeatedly, and can borrow equipment through relevant policies. This model saves a lot of money for research institutions, businesses or individuals, and the company that buys the equipment will also enjoy state subsidies.

The effectiveness of this new sharing model is unquestionable. In order to achieve greater results, instrument sharing is inseparable from the market and the positive guidance of the sharing economy, and provides a good environment. In recent years, China has introduced a series of policies from the first to the local level, aiming to promote the basis of major research.

Facilities and large scientific instruments are available to share. The focus of the policy is to establish incentives and guidance mechanisms that combine rewards and punishments, and to expand the standard and scope of subsidies year by year. It is understood that China has formed a scientific instrument sharing model that has begun to take shape, and has established a national open shared service center.

There has also been a gradual increase in awareness of the sharing of national scientific instruments, as has the quantity and quality of instruments shared.

Sharing, making idle instruments "mobile"Nowadays, instrument sharing platforms have also been established in various places. The instrument-sharing function of metrology networks is also accelerating. Through instrument sharing, it has brought many positive effects.

It combines "sharing" with "laboratory", actively integrates into the wave of sharing, and promotes innovation and development in the field of instruments.

With the rapid development of the sharing model in China's testing industry, there are still many problems with the sharing rules that enterprises and testing institutions should pay attention to. Because scientific instruments are expensive and therefore used in a variety of ways, scientific instruments are different from other shareable products. Consumables, after-sales service, application solutions, and even training in the use of the instrument are crucial in the subsequent sharing of instruments.

In response to these problems, looking for a perfect solution for measurement will form a perfect solution in the construction of functions, and I hope you will continue to pay attention.

Today, when the sharing economy is ubiquitous, the testing industry is about to have a complete sharing mechanism. Instrument sharing is an innovative measure under the new situation of scientific research in China. It is a good policy to encourage small and medium-sized enterprises to innovate independently.

The sharing platform should be tailored to the local situation and develop harmoniously. Looking for measurements here, I also hope that the instrument sharing platform will work better to allow idle instruments to "move".

Whether the purchase of instruments can be entrusted depends on the content of the signed bidding contract, and whether the purchased instruments belong to part of the non-subject and non-critical work of the bid-winning project, and the consent of the tenderer is required if necessary.

Article 46 of the Tendering and Bidding LawThe tenderer and the winning bidder shall, within 30 days from the date of issuance of the notice of winning the bid, enter into a written contract in accordance with the bidding documents and the bidding documents of the winning bidder. The tenderer and the winning bidder shall not enter into other agreements that deviate from the substantive content of the contract.

If the bidding documents require the winning bidder to submit a performance bond, the winning bidder shall submit it.

Article 48 The winning bidder shall perform its obligations in accordance with the contract and complete the bid-winning project. The winning bidder shall not transfer the winning project to others, nor shall the winning project be dismembered and transferred to others.

In accordance with the contract or with the consent of the tenderer, the winning bidder may subcontract part of the non-main and non-critical work of the winning project to others for completion. The person receiving the subcontract shall meet the corresponding qualifications and shall not subcontract again.

The winning bidder shall be responsible to the tenderer for the subcontracted project, and the person receiving the subcontract shall be jointly and severally liable for the subcontracted project.

Regardless of the type of project, the Tendering and Bidding Law applies to the bidding procedure

Article 37 The bid evaluation committee established by the tenderer in accordance with the law is responsible for the bid evaluation.

For projects that must be tendered in accordance with the law, the bid evaluation committee shall be composed of representatives of the tenderer and experts in relevant technical and economic aspects, and the number of members shall be more than five odd numbers, of which experts in technical and economic aspects shall not be less than two-thirds of the total number of members.

The experts in the preceding paragraph shall be engaged in the relevant field for eight years and have a senior professional title or have the same professional level, determined by the tenderer from the relevant departments or the relevant departments of the provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government to provide the roster of experts or the list of experts in the relevant specialties in the expert database of the bidding institutions; General bidding projects can be randomly selected, and special bidding projects can be directly determined by the tenderer.

Persons who have an interest in the bidder shall not enter the bid evaluation committee of the relevant project; Those that have already entered should be replaced.

The list of members of the bid evaluation committee shall be kept confidential until the results of the bid are determined.

That is: if it is 5 people, the representative of the tenderer can only make 1; 7 people evaluated, and the tenderer representative is up to 2 people. Of course, if you're not afraid of prosecution, you can make it all up of your own people.

1. Correction: The evaluation of national projects and public interests should be more than 5 people (odd number), not more than 3 people; 2. If a private enterprise adopts the bidding method, it should evaluate the bid in this way to avoid criticism from bidders!