Which review is more authoritative in the form of review of project pre settlement

Updated on society 2024-02-25
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Commissioned review is more authoritative.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The work at the budget review and finalization stage is as follows:

    1) According to the results determined by the exchange of opinions, the corrected items will be calculated and summarized;

    2) Fill in the project budget review adjustment table, including the "sub-project fixed direct cost adjustment table" and "project budget cost adjustment table";

    3) the direct cost adjustment table, the project budget cost high-speed table by the preparation of the unit responsible person signature, stamped with the official seal, the review unit responsible person signed, stamped with the official seal of the review unit. At this point, the project budget review is finalized.

    Supplement: 1. Preparation for reviewing the project budget.

    The preparation of the audit project budget is basically the same as the preparation of the project budget, that is, the construction drawing budget is counted, classified and sorted, the relevant atlas and construction drawing book are prepared according to the drawing description, familiar with and checked the relevant drawings, participate in the technical disclosure, be familiar with the construction organization design, and conduct surveys at the construction site if necessary.

    2. Understand the quota used in the construction drawing budget.

    According to the instructions for the preparation of the construction drawing budget, understand the preparation. Whether the quotas used in this budget are in accordance with the provisions of the construction contract or the nature of the project. If the project budget is not filled in with the preparation instructions, the budget content should be known from the budget content to use the quota used in this budget.

    Understand what is included in your budget.

    Upon receipt of the project budget, it is advisable to understand the scope of the budget based on the preparation instructions or contents. For example, whether certain supporting projects, outdoor pipelines, roads, technical disclosures, etc., are included in the prepared budget.

    Because the construction drawings of this part of the project are sometimes from different design units, or are not sent to the construction enterprise or construction unit together with the main project design, the project budget may be prepared separately; At the same time, when some design changes are sent to the construction company, the construction company has prepared a budget according to the original drawings and is unwilling to rearrange it (the plan will be adjusted later), but it is not clearly introduced in the preparation instructions.

    After receiving this part of the design change, the construction unit is often bound together with the original construction drawings, therefore, causing inconsistencies between the two parties in the calculation scope, resulting in unnecessary misunderstandings.

    Familiarize yourself with the relevant regulations.

    Budget auditors should be familiar with the provisions of the national and regional regulations on budget quotas, engineering quantity calculation rules, material information ** and various cost extraction standards, not only to review the duplicate items or overcalculated engineering quantities, but also to review the missing items or undercalculated engineering quantities, and should also pay attention to whether the engineering quantity calculation unit is consistent with the budget quota.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The main contents of the review are:1Review whether the preparation of the project budget complies with the requirements of the current national, industry, and local laws, regulations and regulations.

    2.Review the accuracy of quantity calculation, and the consistency of quantity calculation rules with pricing specification rules or quota rules. 3.

    Review whether the various pricing bases are appropriate and whether the rates are accurate in the process of budget preparation; 4.Review whether the selection of various factor markets** is reasonable. 5.

    Review of budget estimates and deviation analysis.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Answers]: a, d

    Textbook p362

    This question examines the review of the completion settlement of the project. The content of the construction unit's review of the completion settlement of the project includes: (1) Review the submission procedures and completeness of the materials for the completion of the project

    Review the legality of the procedures and procedures for the submission of settlement materials, as well as the legal effect of settlement materials; Review the completeness and authenticity of the settlement information and the consistency of the Yu Shirt family. (2) Review the contents related to the completion and settlement of the project: the legality and validity of the project construction contract; The price of the project is adjusted outside the scope of the construction contract; the quantity and unit price of sub-projects, measure projects and other projects; the interface division of the construction unit's separate subcontracting project and the cooperation cost of the general contractor; engineering changes, claims, awards and default costs; Fees, taxes, policy adjustments, and material price difference calculations; the reasons and responsibilities for the difference between the actual construction period and the contract duration, as well as the degree of impact on the project cost; Other contents related to the cost of the project.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Answer: a, b, c, e

    The knowledge points assessed in this question are the review of the estimated budget of the construction project. The contents of the manual review of the construction project budget estimate mainly include: the review of the quantity of workmanship, the review of the quota or index adopted, the review of the material budget, and the review of various expenses.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Answer]: A This question assesses the advantages of the key examination method. The advantages of the key examination method are that the key points are highlighted, the time for careful review is short, and the results are good.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Answer] :d review of the settlement of the old pure workers should be carried out according to the settlement method agreed in the contract, and different review methods should be adopted according to the type of contract. (1) If a lump-sum contract is adopted, the contents that can be adjusted in the contract such as design changes, project negotiation and project claims shall be reviewed on the basis of the contract price; 2) If the unit price contract is adopted, the quantity of each sub-item within the construction drawing shall be reviewed, and the sub-project shall be reviewed in accordance with the method agreed in the contract, and the design changes, project negotiations, construction measures and project claims shall be reviewed; (3) If a cost-plus-remuneration contract is adopted, the project cost of each sub-project and design change, project negotiation, construction measures and other contents shall be reviewed in accordance with the method agreed in the contract, and the remuneration and relevant taxes and fees shall be calculated.

    Unless otherwise agreed, the method of comprehensive review shall be adopted for completion settlement, and it is strictly forbidden to use the methods of sampling review, key review, analysis and comparative review and experience review to avoid the occurrence of omissions in the review.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Answer]: C2021 2020 Textbook P294 2019 Textbook P288

    This question is mainly to examine the review content of the completion settlement. Review content of completion settlement: review the submission procedures and completeness of the materials for settlement (review the submission procedures and legality of the settlement materials, as well as the legal effect of the settlement materials; review the completeness, authenticity and consistency of the settlement information); Review of the contents related to the settlement (the legality and validity of the construction project contract and its supplementary contracts; The price of the project is adjusted outside the scope of the construction contract; the quantity and unit price of sub-projects, measure projects, and other projects; The employer separately subcontracts the project and the general contractor's cooperation costs; engineering changes, claims, awards and default costs; Calculation of fees, taxes, policy adjustments and material price differences; the reasons and responsibilities for the difference between the actual construction period and the contract construction period, as well as the degree of impact on the project cost; Other contents related to the cost of the project.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Answer]: C. Review the content of the completion settlement: review the submission procedures and completeness of the materials for the settlement (review the submission procedures and the legality of the procedures for the settlement of the land calculation data, as well as the legal effect of the settlement materials; review the completeness, authenticity and consistency of the settlement information); Review the legality and validity of the construction project contract and its supplementary contracts related to the settlement ( the legality and validity of the construction project contract and its supplementary contracts; The price of the project is adjusted outside the scope of the construction contract; the quantity and unit price of sub-projects, measure projects, and other projects; the interface division of the project separately subcontracted by the employer and the cooperation cost of the general contractor; engineering changes, claims, awards and default costs; Deduction of fees, taxes, policy adjustments and calculation of material price differences; the reasons and responsibilities for the difference between the actual construction period and the contract construction period, as well as the degree of impact on the project cost; Other contents related to the cost of the project.

    Therefore, option C is correct.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Answer]: b, c, d, e

    This question examines the review of the estimated budget of the construction project. The review of the construction project budget estimate includes: (1) quantity review; (2) The use of quotas or indicators of the examination of the liquid; (3) Review and check the material budget; (4) Review of various expenses.

Related questions
12 answers2024-02-25

The project has been completed, and the accountant needs to review the contract and the bill of materials at the time of settlement. >>>More

3 answers2024-02-25

The settlement process for this certificate is as follows: >>>More

10 answers2024-02-25

The preparation unit of the completion settlement is the construction unit. It is the last to ask the construction unit for money to settle the bill. >>>More

5 answers2024-02-25

Legal Analysis: The way in which evidence is reviewed is:

1.The review and analysis of the legitimacy of evidence should be carried out in strict accordance with the law and relevant judicial interpretations; >>>More

21 answers2024-02-25

The best way is to only give the hamsters special food, don't feed the rest, separate the cage, don't close the cage, change the water and sawdust frequently, remember to let go of the running wheel, so that there is no disease.