Abstract function inequalities, abstract functions and function inequalities

Updated on educate 2024-02-26
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Solution: (1) Because f(x y) = f(x)-f(y)(x,y>0).

    Therefore, if x=y 0, then there is f(1)=f(x)-f(x)=0i.e. f(1)=0.(2).

    Because f(x y) = f(x)-f(y) and f(1) = 0Therefore, if x=1,y0, then there is f(1 y)=f(1)-f(y)=-f(y)That is, there is f(1 x) + f(x) = 0

    x>0).f(6)=1Therefore, the original inequality can be reduced to f(x+3)+f(x) 2f(6)

    =>f(x+3)-f(6)<f(6)-f(x).===>f[(x+3)/6]<f(6/x).Since on r+, the function f(x) is incremented, so there is 0 (x+3) 6 6 x

    =>0<x(x+3)<36.===>0<x<(-3+3√17)/2.That is, the solution set is (0,(-3+3 17) 2).

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    By definition: 1<=x-1 2<=1 --1

    1<=1/4-x<=1 --2

    From the odd function, we know that f(x)=-x

    So f(x-1 2)<-f(1 4-x)=f(x-1 4), i.e., x-1 21 2<=x<=5 4 from the increasing function

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The first question is to join the group.

    Set the orange x>0

    m+x>m

    f(m+x)=f(m)+f(x)-1

    When x>0, f(x)>1

    So f(x)-1>0

    So f(m+x) > f(m).

    So f(x) is an increasing function on r.

    Second question. f(3)=f(1)+f(2)-1 =f(1)+f(1)+f(1)-1-1

    f(3)=4

    3f(1)-2=4

    f(1)=2

    f(a^2+a-5)<2

    f(a 2+a-5) a 2+a-5

    3

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Solution: (1) Because f(x y) = f(x)-f(y)(x,y>0).

    Therefore, if x=y 0, then there is f(1)=f(x)-f(x)=0i.e. f(1)=0.(2).

    Because f(x y) = f(x)-f(y) and f(1) = 0Therefore, if x=1,y0, then there is f(1 y)=f(1)-f(y)=-f(y)That is, there is f(1 x) + f(x) = 0

    x>0).f(6)=1Therefore, the original inequality can be reduced to f(x+3)+f(x) 2f(6)

    =>f(x+3)-f(6)<f(6)-f(x).===>f[(x+3)/6]<f(6/x).Since on r+, the function f(x) is incremented, so there is 0 (x+3) 6 6 x

    =>0<x(x+3)<36.===>0<x<(-3+3√17)/2.That is, the solution set is (0,(-3+3 17) 2).

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Let x=y bring f(x y)=f(x)-f(y), and get f(1)=0f(x+3)-f(1 x)-2 < 0

    f(x+3)-f(1 x)-f(6)-f(6) <0f[(x+3)x 36] <0 = f(1) multiplication, so (x+3) x 36 <1

    x 2 + 3x-36 < 0 is fine, pay attention to x>0

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The so-called abstract inequality is an inequality in which a concrete algebraic formula is not explicitly given on either side of the inequality.

    For example, let f(x) be an increasing function defined on r, satisfying f(1)=2, and for any real number x,y, there is f(x+y)=f(x+f(y).

    Solve the inequality f(x-1)+f(2x)>4

    Solution: The original inequality can be reduced by the condition f(2)=f(1+1)=f(1)+f(1)=4.

    f(x-1 +2x)>f(2)

    again f(x) is the increasing function, thus.

    x-1 +2x >2

    Solve x>1

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    It's just that there are some high-level multiples that you can't apply to basic functions.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    In the first problem, the inequality is deformed into f(1+a)<-f(1-a) Note that f is an odd function, then -f(1-a)=f(a-1) so that the original inequality can be reduced to f(1+a)a -1, note that f defines the domain as -1<1+a<1 and -1f(2x) 1, so 1-x >0 (if not, f(1-x)=1, contradicts f(1-x)>1) and note that f is monotonically not strictly increasing, so there is 1-x >2x and thus 1- 20 knows -1, so the range of x is (1-2,1).

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Think of the side of x as a whole that satisfies the domain of definitions.

    0,1] means that the x square is greater than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 1

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    That is, 0 x 1, the domain of f(x) is a, then the domain of f[g(x)] is g(x)=a

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    In the first question. Transform the inequality into f(1+a)<-f(1-a) Note that f is an odd function, then -f(1-a) = f(a -1) so that the original inequality can be reduced to f(1+a).

    a -1, note that f defines the domain as -1<1+a<1 and -1f(2x) 1, so 1-x >0 (otherwise f(1-x finch) = 1, which contradicts f(1-x pinch) >1) and note that f is monotonically not strictly increasing, so there is 1-x and 2x and thus 1-2

Related questions
13 answers2024-02-26

a^2b+b^2c

a*ab+b*bc) >>>More

13 answers2024-02-26

Let's say there are x boxes, y parts.

Get the inequality. >>>More

17 answers2024-02-26

Because a + b a+b

So a + b [a+b (a + b)]a+b [a+b (a + b)]. >>>More

5 answers2024-02-26

What else do you want us to help with like this!

9 answers2024-02-26

Solution: Substituting x=2 into (m+2)x=2 obtains:

m+2)×2=2 >>>More