Why are many wealthy people reluctant to save themselves wisely through charity?

Because they must also think that they can save themselves through charity, and others will not think that he will definitely think that he is putting on a show, so they simply donate, and if they donate, they must donate, a very large amount, otherwise they will be morally kidnapped by people on the Internet.

Because many people may feel that they are poor, and everyone has this kind of mental thinking that they can't help themselves through charity, so they have this kind of thinking.

The hearts of rich people want to make more money, they don't feel that they have earned enough, so they want to donate all the money, they will always feel that they have not made enough money, they are not rich enough, they will not want to save themselves through charity.

Philanthropy requires an economic, political and cultural environment. China's wealthy have just become rich, some of their wealth is not stable enough, they lack a sense of security, and they are also facing the problem of family inheritance and industrial upgrading, and charity is not a concern at this stage.

In fact, a person can only want more and more money, and no one knows how to be satisfied and wants to donate their money, so they just want to make more money through that money.

Because although the times have changed, people have changed, and ways have changed, the general thinking will not change, and they are still unwilling to take out their own money to help others.

You are stupid in this question, true charity is not an obligation, let alone utilitarianism. I don't owe the world anything to save myself. Let the old clichés of Buddhism go to.