WWII tank M4 series VS Pz 4 series who is amazing

The American M4 Sherman and the German No. 4 tank have many models and deformation vehicles, all equipped with 75 mm guns, which can be said to be the main tanks of Germany and the United States, and the No. 4 has A, B, C, D, E, F1, F2, G, H, and J (the No. 4 tank after the F1 is all long-barreled and equipped with muzzle-braked artillery.) ), and the M4 Sherman has M4A1, M4A2, M4A3, M4A4, M4A3E2, M4A3E8 (E2, E8 are not even Tiger and Leopard, and it can be said that the Allied armor is the second thickest, the first is the Churchill infantry tank, and the main armor is up to 152 mm. Most of the A1, A2, and A3 were equipped with 75 mm guns, and later due to insufficient armor piercing, they were converted into 76 mm long-barreled guns with muzzle brakes, and in addition, the British also replaced the Sherman tank with 77 mm 17-pounder anti-tank guns, so that they could effectively deal with German tanks such as the Tiger, Leopard, and No. 4; In terms of output, the output of M4 can far exceed that of No. 4, and the ratio of output is 50,000:

8000, so in comparison, M4 is still relatively powerful. But both tanks can represent the tank units of both sides, for example, they can be seen on medals and badges.

I think it's the M4, but I don't understand the WWII tank, I just like the M4 ......It seems that there are many people who like tank No. 4.

Tank No. 4 and M4 are both 75mm guns (M4 also has a 105 gun model), Tank 4 has an engine of 300 horsepower, while M4 has 400 horsepower, but Tank 4 has thicker armor than M4, and the combination of firepower, mobility and protection should be about the same.

Looks like Sherman and No. 4 have a lot of models, right? There is also a big gap between the different models.

The Sherman series is characterized by agility and maneuverability, which can also be well traveled on complex terrain, and is very reliable on the battlefield.

The Four-Four is characterized by a large number of models and powerful capabilities, which allows it to conduct operations in various mission conditions (infantry support, anti-tank, raid, etc.).

The strongest firepower in the No. 4 series is the H-type, equipped with the L 48 gun, which the Germans believe is the most cost-effective German tank in World War II, and the production has also become the most 3774 vehicles in the German No. 4 sequence (the H-type was started in 43, at this time the Leopard has appeared, forming the strength of the four-H).

The best firepower in the Sherman series is the Sherman Firefly, equipped with a 17-pounder gun, and the flanking tiger is not a problem, but unfortunately the number is very scarce, all of which are transformed by the Sherman of the battlefield, and the Allies mainly rely on Sherman to use the number to flank the German tanks, or the bombers are brutal, which is naturally not as strong as the German armored forces.

It depends on which model of M4, M4 is the most produced tank in World War II, there are many models, and the performance difference between them is also very large, some models use 105 guns, which are very powerful, and some have very strong frontal armor protection, but all models are equally reliable and durable, which is incomparable to the PZ4 and any other German tank.

None of the early models of the No. 4 surpassed the M4 in terms of performance, but after the long-barreled gun was replaced in the later stage, the armor-piercing ability always exceeded that of the M4, but the armor was always weaker than the M4, the engine and running gear were too complex, and the maneuverability was not as good as the M4

The early stage of the M4 PZ4 was all garbage to the F2 type to have a long barrel cannon.

The main ** of the Soviet T34 tank is a millimeter F-34 main gun, and the main improved models are T-34 76 and T-34 85;Derivative models OT-34 and so on. In total, more than 80,000 such tanks were produced. As the main battle tank of the Soviet Union in World War II, the T34 tank played a certain role in its superior performance in data and actual combat.

Another key point is that the tank is easy to operate, and it is no exaggeration to say that a farmer who has never learned to drive a tank can learn how to drive a T34 in a few days.

The total production of American M4 tanks in World War II reached 49,234 units, and the main guns were 75mm, 76mm, and 90mm.

After reading the above data, whether it is production or defense, artillery power, etc., I personally think that it should be T34 ruthless (because the tank is easy to operate)!

T34, of course....In the tank war of World War II, only the Soviet and German tanks were the real strong, and the United States, Britain, France, and Japan (the worst) were the scum....

The United States did not catch up with the Soviet Union until the advent of the M60, and it did not slightly surpass the Soviet Union until the advent of the M1 Abrams.

Comfort and maneuverability M4 superiority, survivability and firepower T34 85 is superior to M4, and T34 is easy to operate, easy to train drivers, during the war, car drivers can drive T34 after three days of training.

Decisive Soviet KV fierce, these two are a dish in his eyes...

The cost and manufacturing time of the T-34 gave it an absolute advantage.

It depends on what aspect it is, in terms of vitality performance, both are similar; But the T-34 tank had oblique armor on the front, which greatly increased the defense to the same extent, which was epoch-making. M4 doesn't. And the T-34 knows that tens of thousands of units were produced at the end of World War II, and the number is also incomparable with the M4.

So in my opinion, the Soviet-made T-34 medium tank is good.