-
Mathematical induction proves that (1-h) n 1 (1+hn) holds for any natural number n in the range of 0 h 1.
Proof: n=1, 1-h) n=1-h
1/(1+hn)=1/(1+h)
by 0 h 1
1-h 1 (1+h), 1-h 1, is clearly true.
Assuming n=k, (1-h) k 1 (1+hk) holds.
then n=k+1.
1-h)^(k+1)=(1-h)^k(1-h)≤(1-h)/(1+hk)
If (1-h) (1+hk) 1 [1+h(k+1)] 1) then (1-h)[1+h(k+1)] 1+hk1+h+hk -h-h -kh 1+hkh +kh 0
by 0 h 1
Since h 0, k > 0, the above equation holds, i.e., hypothesis (1) holds.
According to the inductive method, (1-h) n 1 (1+hn) holds for any n in the range of 0 h 1.
-
This is obviously true when n=1, and it is still true when n=k, i.e., (1-h) k<=1-kh
When n=k+1, (1-h)(1-h) k<=(1-h)(1-kh)<(1-(k+1)h) is proved.
-
n=2 ((n+1)/2)^n= [2+1)/2]^2= n!=2*1=2 So((n+1) 2) n> n!Establish.
n>2 Suppose n=k holds the original formula, i.e., ((k+1) 2) k> k!i.e. (k+1) k 2 k>k!(1)
Then n=k+1, ((k+1+1) 2) (k+1)=(k+2) (k+1) (2*2 k).2)
Cause(k+2) (k+1)>2(k+1) (k+1).3)
3) Substituting (2) (k+1+1) 2) (k+1)=(k+2) (k+1) (2*2 k)>2(k+1) (k+1) (2*2 k)=(k+1) (k+1) 2 k=(k+1)*(k+1) k 2 k(4)
Substituting (1) into (4) gives ((k+1+1) 2) (k+1)>(k+1)*k!=(k+1)!i.e. n=k+1((n+1) 2) n > n!Establish.
-
This is true when n=1.
This is true when n=n.
then when n=n+1.
1+2+3+…+n+n+1
1/2)n*(n+1)+n+1
1/2)(n+2)*(n+1)
Established, so established.
-
Problem solving ideas: Directly use the mathematical induction method to prove the steps of the problem, and prove the inequality can be proved: (1) When n=2, [1 2+1+
24] The proposition holds
2) Suppose that when n=k, [1 k+1+
k+2+k+3+…+
2k 24] was founded.
When n=k+1, [1 k+2+
k+3+…+
2k+2k+1+
2k+2]=[1/k+1]+[1/k+2+k+3+…+
2k+2k+1+
2k+2]−
k+1>2k+1+
2k+2−k+1,∵[1/2k+1+
2k+2−k+1=
2(2k+1)(k+1)>0,∴
k+1)+1+
k+1)+2+
k+1)+3+…+
2(k+1)>
24], when n=k+1 the proposition holds
So for any n 2, n n* holds , 10,
-
Proof 1: When n=1, the left side = 1*1!=1, right =(1+1)!-1=2-1=1
i.e. left = right.
2. The assumption that n=k(k 1) is the conclusion is true.
i.e. 1 1!+2•2!+.k•k!=(k+1)!-1 then when n=k+1, 1 1!+2•2!+.k•k!+(k+1)(k+1)!
k+1)!-1+(k+1)(k+1)!
k+1)!+k+1)(k+1)!-1
1+(k+1)](k+1)!-1
k+2)(k+1)!-1
k+2)!-1
k+1+1)!-1
That is, the conclusion of n=k+1 is true.
Therefore, in summary, the original proposition is valid.
-
When n=1, 1*(1+1)(2*1+1) 6=1, holds.
When n=2, 2*(2+1)(2*2+1) 6=5, holds.
Assuming n=k, 1 + 2 + 3 + ...n = n(n+1)(2n+1) 6 is true, but when n = k+1, 1 +2 +3 +....k²+(k+1)²=(1²+2²+3²+…k²)+k+1)²=k(k+1)(2k+1)/6+(k+1)²=(k+1)(k(2k+1)/6+(k+1))=(k+1)((2k²+k+6k+6)/6)=(k+1)(2k²+k+6k+6)/6
k+1)(2k²+7k+6)/6
k+1)((k+2)(2k+3))/6=(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)/6
k+1)((k+1)+1)(2(k+1)+1) 6.
-
Proof that 1' when n=1, left = (2*1-1) =1, right = 1 3*1*(4*1 -1), left = right, the proposition is true.
2' Suppose the proposition holds when n=k.
i.e. 1 + 3 + 5 +2k-1) = 1 3k (4k-1) holds.
Then when n=k+1, left=1 +3 +5+2k-1)²+2(k+1)-1]²=1/3k(4k²-1)+(2k+1)²
1/3k+4k²+4k+1
4/3k3+4k²+11/3k+1
Right = 1 3 (k + 1) [4 (k + 1) -1] = (1 3k + 1 3) ( 4k +8k + 3) = 4 3k 3 + 8 3k + 8 3k + 1
4/3k3+4k²+11/3k+1
Left = Right, the proposition is true.
The proposition from 'is that any n belongs to n*.