Why is Kidd on par with Nash?

In the 2018 Hall of Fame, two great players were selected – Kidd and Nash. Kidd and Nash each won five assists, and each of them was a very low-key but great passer focused on the game of basketball. On the occasion of being inducted into the Hall of Fame, we should provide these two great passers-by with a high level of organizational skills.

Stats alone, Kidd ranks second in the league with 12,091 assists, followed by Nash 10,335; But in his career, Nash is only 18 years old and Kidd is 19 years old, and Kidd's highest season average per game average per game is Nash's number of assists in five seasons is more than 11, and the most in a single season is only one assist. Over the course of his career, Kidd played about 30 minutes per game per season. At least 7 assists, which Nash can't do; In addition, Kidd can hand out 25 assists in a game, compared to Nash's 22; However, Nash has 20+8 assists alone and Kidd has only 2.

So, it's hard to distinguish between Nash and Kidd's assists in an absolute sense.

Nash and Kidd have historically been great passers and cool team brains, as can be seen in their nearly equal assist and turnover rates; (The two are almost close to three) but with organised technical characteristics, Kidd and Nash still have a clear difference: in fact, a more efficient and capable defender has a greater passing threat, but Nash vs. Kidd, we can easily dismiss it as a paradox. Nash and Kidd are both defenders, and they are very good at passing the ball between players, which is what they have in common; But in comparison, Kidd is more capable of controlling the game alone because he doesn't need to use pick-and-rolls as Nash except for the fact that Kidd can't organize the offense.

path, his high position is also sharp, which is understandable, because Kidd is taller and has a wider field of view; Of course, Nash is really just a line between master passers, it's just relatively stronger.

If you want to talk about the way the organization is organized, Kidd is indeed stronger than Nash, and it's no exaggeration to say that Kidd is so strong, probably because he can't attack.

In the 2018 Hall of Fame, two great players were selected – Kidd and Nash.

Therefore, in the course of opening basketball courses, college basketball teachers should not only impart basketball knowledge, technology, and physical training, but also pay attention to the cultivation of students' tactical awareness, innovate basketball tactics teaching methods, and pay attention to the cultivation of collectivism in basketball.

For a certain sport, it may belong to the category of folk sports under certain conditions, but it may not belong to the category of folk sports under certain conditions.

Chen's Tai Chi in Chenjiagou, Wen County, Henan Province is a traditional sport created by the local people and passed down to this day, and swinging is a traditional sport created and passed down by a certain ethnic group (the ancient Shanrong people).

Personally, I think that Nash's comprehensive ability is stronger and his historical status is higher. Nash is known as the Magic, not only can score on his own, but the most important thing is to be able to drive his teammates, which is the performance that a superstar should have, but looking at the current Harden, it is difficult to drive his teammates when he can't. So a player like Nash would be more valuable.

Nash, who is more capable and has a relatively high historical status, is a point guard, and is now the head coach of the Nets, with a total of two regular season MVP titles in his career, then 8 All-Star selections, 5 assists titles, and two Skill Challenge titles.

Kidd and Nash are both very well-known point guards in the NBA. At his peak, I think Nash would have been stronger. He has also achieved better.

Kidd and Nash are super point guards of the same era, and the two have very different styles, but their careers are quite similar. When he first entered the league, Nash played on the same team as Kidd, and he was also Kidd's backup. Both have since played for the Mavericks and have had success in both.

Kidd has the nickname of Kidd, a player who is a top player in the organization and defense, and the scoring ability is average. Nash is a different story, scoring is top-notch, but his defense is average.

Nash's talent is average, his athleticism is not outstanding, he was only selected with the 15th pick in the '96 draft, and he also played as a substitute for many years in the early part of his career, and he was not favored at all. Kidd is very talented, he is the star of the 94 year, he showed strong strength when he first entered the league, not to mention winning the best rookie, and soon became the league's No. 1 point guard, which can be said to be sharp. So can Peak Kidd beat Nash?

Looking at the counterpoint data 34 times, the results are obvious.

When he first joined the league, Nash was playing as a bench for Kidd. He was traded to the Mavericks and Kidd shone with the Nets. Nash, who was depressed with the Mavericks and was waived by Cuban at the age of 30, returned to the Suns to start a new chapter.

It was also during that time that Kidd said goodbye to the Nets and joined the Mavericks to partner Nowitzki, where he made his successful ascent to the top. The two have been teammates, and both have played for the Suns and Mavericks for many years, so they can be said to be both teachers and friends.

On the regular season stage, Nash and Kidd have played each other a total of 34 times, and Kidd has the advantage in terms of record, with a 19-15 record. As a point guard, Kidd averaged shots per game, could get points, rebounds and assists, and shot percentage, which is in line with his consistent performance, and is a well-rounded point guard who can organize and defend. Nash averaged 16 points and assists on shots per game, shooting 50 percent from the field.

As an offensive point guard, Nash has performed well on the offensive end, and he can be said to be equal to Kidd.

Both men have been the league's No. 1 point guards, but their primes don't overlap and they haven't faced each other head-to-head in the playoffs. From a career perspective, Nash and Kidd can be said to have their own merits. Both of them have 5 assists and are all-time passing masters, of which Kidd has been selected for a team and defense many times in his career, and he has also won championships, so he is a more well-rounded player.

However, Nash also has 2 MVPs in hand, and his personal accolades can overpower Kidd. On the whole, the strength of the two is equal, and Kidd, who is as strong as the peak, can't beat Nash.

Nash has been the better performer, with more wins and fewer losses in those 34 encounters, and has been consistent and is the playmaker of the team.

Nash was better. Kidd and Nash have played each other 34 times, with Nash winning more and losing less, and his stats are better than Kidd's.

Comparing the numbers, Nash is better, he is more explosive on the court, and has a strong scoring ability.

I think it's Nash, although Kidd and Nash do have their own strengths. But I personally prefer Nash, after all, how many people were in the Phoenix City. I'll briefly analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the two.

One. Nash has strong offensive ability and poor defense.

As a member of the famous 180 Club, Nash's offensive efficiency has always been at the forefront of the league, and in the current form of the league, it is already a general environment to focus on offense and light on defense. The league is all about offense, and players who are strong on offense can compensate for it in other ways even if they are poor defensively. The typical ones that are now building a team as point guards are Curry of the Warriors, Lillard of the Trail Blazers, and Trae Young, a rising star.

These guys are typical of strong offense and weak defense, of course, this defensive weakness is relative to the point guard, but their influence in the league is self-evident. With Nash's style of play and ability to control the court, he will inevitably go to the next level in the current league.

Two. Kidd is tough defensively and has a slight offense with star players.

Kidd's name used to be used to describe Kidd, despite his top-notch defense and playmaking. But the number of shots he made on offense is indeed a little small, for the current league, star guards must have the ability to attack, although the lower limit is not low to build a team with Kidd, this year's Paul is a good example. But judging from the league's current offensive and defensive transitions, it is still a little less meaningful.

The current ball brother Ball, his talent can be said to be on the same level as Kidd, but his offensive ability is more than one period worse than Kidd, and his talent has not been exchanged for a long time so far. But if Brother Qiu practiced the basket, it would be terrible.

Actually, both of them are good at point guards, and I just think from my personal point of view that Nash might be a better fit. But everyone has different opinions, different opinions, you say that Kidd is better, I can't completely refute it, after all, this is all hypothesis, Kidd in the current league to practice the basket well, with his hard-wearing physical fitness, maybe his career will be more brilliant than Nash. After all, Nash's static quality is still a little worse.

But none of this detracts from their greatness.