Who can give a specific time for the team Kidd Nash has played for? The good ones will be rewarded h

Jason Kidd.

Position: Point guard.

Height: m 6'4

Weight: 96 kg 212 lbs.

Birthday: 1973-03-23

Team: Dallas Mavericks.

Played for: Dallas Mavericks, Phoenix Suns, New Jersey Nets.

94-95 calves.

95-96 calves.

96-97 Suns.

96-97 calves.

97-98 Suns.

98-99 Suns.

99-00 Suns.

00-01 Sun.

01-02 Nets.

02-03 Nets.

03-04 Nets.

04-05 Nets.

05-06 Nets.

06-07 Nets.

07-08 Nets.

07-08 Mavericks.

Steve Nash.

Position: Point guard.

Height: m 6ft3

Weight: 89 kg 196 lbs.

Date of birth: February 7, 1974.

96-97 Suns.

97-98 Suns.

98-99 calves.

99-00 calves.

00-01 Mavericks.

01-02 Mavericks.

02-03 Mavericks.

03-04 Mavericks.

04-05 Sun.

05-06 Sun.

06-07 Sun.

07-08 Sun.

Jason Kidd.

Played for: Dallas Mavericks, Phoenix Suns, New Jersey Nets 94-95 Mavericks.

95-96 calves.

96-97 Suns.

96-97 calves.

97-98 Suns.

98-99 Suns.

99-00 Suns.

00-01 Sun.

01-02 Nets.

02-03 Nets.

03-04 Nets.

04-05 Nets.

05-06 Nets.

06-07 Nets.

07-08 Nets.

07-08 Mavericks.

Steve Nash.

96-97 Suns.

97-98 Suns.

98-99 calves.

99-00 calves.

00-01 Mavericks.

01-02 Mavericks.

02-03 Mavericks.

03-04 Mavericks.

04-05 Sun.

05-06 Sun.

06-07 Sun.

07-08 Sun.

I think both of them are suited to be the building blocks of the team, but Kidd is a better fit than Nash. Here's why:

First of all, both of them are masters of blocking and pick-and-roll, and they are both great guards who can maximize the strengths of their teammates. The difference is that Nash's blocking and dismantling ability is stronger, the projection is also better, and the passing in the movement is against the sky, note, it is not excellent, it is against the Wu Wu Void level, and in the current era of more shooters and more space, it is even more like a fish in water, Nash's ability to create opportunities for teammates has been unmatched so far, and it is of course an excellent cornerstone for team building.

Secondly, Kidd's vision is broader, unlike everyone's impression that Kidd's sprint speed is fast, he can advance to the front court at the fastest speed, and buy more time for tactical launches, and at the same time, the success rate of fast break with Kidd's participation is the highest in the league at that time.

Then, combined with the current era of small ball, the most suitable is to approximate five Pippen, five Garnett This kind of moderate height, more than 2 meters, with a certain speed and a certain body swing position, can run and can defend the rotation, Nash's aggression is really awesome, but the bag will greatly limit his aggressiveness, which can be seen from Curry in the past few years, at this time, there must be a point in the team to pull the space, otherwise it will be really difficult to open once it is strangled.

Finally, the most important Kidd has a good team building record. Nash's physicality will lead to a serious barrel effect and will be targeted more than Curry has been in recent years. (Nash has a serious injury to his spine).

Nash can create good chances on the offensive end, but on the defensive end, the opposition's strong defenders only need to play alone to get it back. Kidd, on the defensive end, can rotate defense, offensive can impact the interior when he is young, and can shoot at fixed points when he is old, plus organizational attributes. It's fair to say that in this era of aggressive guards, Kidd is a better fit for a team than Nash.

Nash is better suited to build a team. Because of his strong strength, he has a fast dribble, a wide field of vision, and is good at passing assists and shooting baskets. He can work well with his teammates, and he won a lot of accolades at his peak, and there are a lot of people who support him.

I think Kidd is more of a fittest team, because the prime minister is definitely more patient than the latter, and his ball skills are also very high, and he is more suitable for managing ships or teams, but the latter has a personality like a beast, I don't think he is very good at management.

I personally think that Kidd is more suitable to borrow the right, because Kidd is very experienced, has a certain explosiveness, and also has a certain impact, and the team ability to cooperate with him is very strong and quite powerful.

Kidd and Nash are super point guards of the same era, and the two have very different styles, but their careers are quite similar. When he first entered the league, Nash played on the same team as Kidd, and he was also Kidd's backup. Both have since played for the Mavericks and have had success in both.

Kidd has the nickname of Kidd, a player who is a top player in the organization and defense, and the scoring ability is average. Nash is a different story, scoring is top-notch, but his defense is average.

Nash's talent is average, his athleticism is not outstanding, he was only selected with the 15th pick in the '96 draft, and he also played as a substitute for many years in the early part of his career, and he was not favored at all. Kidd is very talented, he is the star of the 94 year, he showed strong strength when he first entered the league, not to mention winning the best rookie, and soon became the league's No. 1 point guard, which can be said to be sharp. So can Peak Kidd beat Nash?

Looking at the counterpoint data 34 times, the results are obvious.

When he first joined the league, Nash was playing as a bench for Kidd. He was traded to the Mavericks and Kidd shone with the Nets. Nash, who was depressed with the Mavericks and was waived by Cuban at the age of 30, returned to the Suns to start a new chapter.

It was also during that time that Kidd said goodbye to the Nets and joined the Mavericks to partner Nowitzki, where he made his successful ascent to the top. The two have been teammates, and both have played for the Suns and Mavericks for many years, so they can be said to be both teachers and friends.

On the regular season stage, Nash and Kidd have played each other a total of 34 times, and Kidd has the advantage in terms of record, with a 19-15 record. As a point guard, Kidd averaged shots per game, could get points, rebounds and assists, and shot percentage, which is in line with his consistent performance, and is a well-rounded point guard who can organize and defend. Nash averaged 16 points and assists on shots per game, shooting 50 percent from the field.

As an offensive point guard, Nash has performed well on the offensive end, and he can be said to be equal to Kidd.

Both men have been the league's No. 1 point guards, but their primes don't overlap and they haven't faced each other head-to-head in the playoffs. From a career perspective, Nash and Kidd can be said to have their own merits. Both of them have 5 assists and are all-time passing masters, of which Kidd has been selected for a team and defense many times in his career, and he has also won championships, so he is a more well-rounded player.

However, Nash also has 2 MVPs in hand, and his personal accolades can overpower Kidd. On the whole, the strength of the two is equal, and Kidd, who is as strong as the peak, can't beat Nash.

Nash has been the better performer, with more wins and fewer losses in those 34 encounters, and has been consistent and is the playmaker of the team.

Nash was better. Kidd and Nash have played each other 34 times, with Nash winning more and losing less, and his stats are better than Kidd's.

Comparing the numbers, Nash is better, he is more explosive on the court, and has a strong scoring ability.

I think it's Nash, although Kidd and Nash do have their own strengths. But I personally prefer Nash, after all, how many people were in the Phoenix City. I'll briefly analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the two. <>

One. Nash has strong offensive ability and poor defense.

As a member of the famous 180 Club, Nash's offensive efficiency has always been at the forefront of the league, and in the current form of the league, it is already a general environment to focus on offense and light on defense. The league is all about offense, and players who are strong on offense can compensate for it in other ways even if they are poor defensively. The typical ones that are now building a team as point guards are Curry of the Warriors, Lillard of the Trail Blazers, and Trae Young, a rising star.

These guys are typical of strong offense and weak defense, of course, this defensive weakness is relative to the point guard, but their influence in the league is self-evident. With Nash's style of play and ability to control the court, he will inevitably go to the next level in the current league. <>

Two. Kidd is tough defensively and slightly worse offensively with star players.

Kidd's name used to be used to describe Kidd, despite his top-notch defense and playmaking. But the number of shots he made on offense is indeed a little small, for the current league, star guards must have the ability to attack, although the lower limit is not low to build a team with Kidd, this year's Paul is a good example. But judging from the league's current offensive and defensive transitions, it is still a little less meaningful.

The current ball brother Ball, his talent can be said to be on the same level as Kidd, but his offensive ability is more than one period worse than Kidd, and his talent has not been exchanged for a long time so far. But if Brother Qiu practiced the basket, it would be terrible. <>

Actually, both of them are good at point guards, and I just think from my personal point of view that Nash might be a better fit. But everyone has different opinions, different opinions, you say that Kidd is better, I can't completely refute it, after all, this is all hypothesis, Kidd in the current league to practice the basket well, with his hard-wearing physical fitness, maybe the career will be more brilliant than Nash. After all, Nash's static quality is still a little worse.

But none of this detracts from their greatness.

Kidd is more suitable for building a team because Kidd is a bit stronger and has good command skills.

Nash is better suited to build a team. Small-ball tactics are prevalent in today's league, and Nash is an expert at small-ball tactics.

I think they all have their own strengths, and no matter what, I think they all have their own strengths to build a team.