Debate material on Which is more concerned by society, professional or generalist .

It's more important to be a specialist. After all, one's energy is limited. Unless you're very smart, you can't do everything well.

Under limited conditions, we should do a good job in the profession first, and it will be useful only when we do it well. Otherwise, it is useless to know everything, and if you don't know everything. After doing a good job in the major, of course, you can demand your own all-round development.

Summary. Dear, hello 1, all-rounders adapt to society faster than specialists, and take them for society. There is a real problem in modern society - the frequent turnover of talent.

With the continuous progress of China's market economy, the adjustment of industrial structure, and the deepening of occupational structure adjustment, we find that the flow of talent across industries and fields is becoming more and more frequent. The complexity of society makes it less and less possible to engage in one job for the rest of your life. The fact that a large number of professional and technical personnel were laid off in the late 90s and early years is a good proof of this.

At this time, is it better for generalists with multiple skills to adapt to the changes of modern society than those with only one skill? The process of adapting to society is not only the embodiment of self-worth, but also an important key to the rational distribution of social human resources.

Debate: Does society need all-rounders or professionals? Mine is the right side - an all-round talent, seeking opinions and arguments.

Dear, hello 1, all-rounders adapt to society faster than specialists, and take them for society. There is a real problem in modern society - the frequent turnover of talent. With the continuous progress of China's market economy, the adjustment of industrial structure, and the deepening of occupational structure adjustment, we have found that the flow of talents across industries and fields is becoming more and more frequent.

The complexity and change of society make it less and less permeable to engage in one kind of work for a lifetime. The fact that a large number of professional and technical personnel were laid off in the late 90s and early years is a good proof of this. At this time, is it better for generalists with multiple skills to adapt to the changes of modern society than those who have only one skill?

The process of adapting to society is not only the embodiment of self-worth, but also an important key to the rational distribution of social human resources.

In the debate competition, we are the public security organs need all-round talents, and the other party is a pure key shirt and needs professional talents, so what questions can I ask in the question session? Stump the other person.

Is there an answer to my question?

This kind of answer depends on the improvisation of the questions on the spot.

Think about the questions in advance.

There is a question and answer session.

Dear, yes. Dear, before you start, you first want to have questions, remember the notebook.

May I ask you, if there is an all-rounder in a team who understands both law and architectural design, does the team not need legal expertise or architectural design expertise, and let him pick two ends by himself?

When a patient needs heart surgery, do you think it is better to hire a medical professional who performs heart surgery to perform the surgery, or to hire a generalist who understands both orthopedics and dental care, can treat ear, nose and throat abnormalities, and can also use Chinese medicine to recuperate the body?

How do you become an all-rounder for most ordinary people?

Ask the other party, in today's increasingly detailed social division of labor, do you think that Quancai should be mainly responsible for one part of the work, or should you take care of all the work you can do?

Then at this time, you ask, since they are all all-rounders, why can Yang Liwei sit on Shenzhou No. 5 to the sky, but Yuan Longping cannot! If he answers that they are not all-rounders, you say yes, Yuan Longping is a specialist, he invented hybrid rice, and crop yields increased by 10%! There are a few others that can be said!

The specialization of students is strong, and the specialization of master's students is stronger. Is it an all-rounder? Is it a professional? Employment depends on academic qualifications, why?

Expertise advantage: The division of social knowledge and skills can greatly improve the learning input-output ratio and adapt to the established job division of labor.

All-round advantage: It can evaluate and coordinate the distribution of labor on a wider scale.

Generalists are needed, but there are more generalists, which means that as a generalist, the challenge is greater because you have fewer opportunities.

Generalists and specialists play a vital role in the development of society.

Which one is more needed than not coming out.

Because professionals can be seen everywhere in comparison, professionals are reused, success cases abound, and the threshold for becoming a specialist is lower than that of generalists.

In fact, whether it is a company or a country, many major decisions need a generalist to weigh the pros and cons, because they have a broad vision.

For example, a computer professional is proficient in hardware, but he also becomes a computer hardware specialist on the basis of a generalist in certain disciplines such as mathematics, physics, chemistry, and language. In his future development, if he wants to make achievements, he also needs to supplement his expertise in software, electronics, etc., and he will become a generalist.

Therefore, from the perspective of social needs, it should be equally important, but there will be certain differences in the needs of different periods, such as since the reform and opening up, what China lacks is more professional and skilled talents, that is, professionals.

Most of the more convincing ones are in the form of examples!