There are a few sick dogs in the village that are sick in the countryside

1, because the other 49 people saw the sick dog and had no right to rob it, only the owner of the sick dog saw that other people's dogs were not crazy, so they knew that their own dog was a sick dog.

It should be 50 of them, and I'm a math teacher.

There was a burst of empty guns, and none of the dogs died, and they were all scared away.

Not at all! No one can figure it out

2 to 50 is possible.

I can't figure it out anyway.

Summary. Hello dear! First of all, it may not be so convenient to see a dog in the countryside, if it is not particularly serious, first feed some anti-inflammatory drugs, if it is particularly serious, you must go to the doctor, or it is really not possible to find a veterinarian in the village. You are welcome to consult me again.

Hello dear! First of all, it may not be so convenient to treat the dog in the countryside, if it is not particularly serious, feed some anti-inflammatory drugs first, if it is particularly serious, you must go to the doctor of nuclear socks, or it is really not possible to find a veterinarian in the village. Welcome to consult me again.

Dog raised in the rural hometown, more than 10 years, his symptom is bleeding from the left nostril, but not much, a limb selling to touch his head gently patted with a scream, the left side of the head seems to hurt, and he always uses his paws to paste the left side of the head, what is this disease.

Hello dear! In your case, go to the hospital as soon as possible and ask those doctors to check it for me, because I don't know much about this either.

The reason for this is that there are fewer and fewer people in the countryside.

Originally, there were relatively few people in the countryside now, let alone dogs.

This may be because there are not many people who have dogs, and there are fewer people in the countryside.

This is because people don't care about the company of these little animals anymore.

Since there was only one gunshot, there was only one sick dog...

3, I only did it in the written test today.

There were 3 sick dogs. This is a classic recursive problem, and the premise of the problem is that everyone is smart enough to reason about all possibilities. If there is only one sick dog, the owner of the sick dog can know that his dog is a sick dog through observation, so he will kill his dog on the first day.

If there are two sick dogs, and both sick dog owners A and B see one sick dog, then one of them, A, will reason as follows: if there is only one sick dog, then the sick dog owner (i.e., B) will know by observation that B's dog is a sick dog and will kill the dog on the first day, so A will not kill his dog on the first day, but wait for B's decision. B would make the same reasoning, so neither of them would kill the dog if they were not sure whether their dog was sick on the first day.

The next day, both A and B found that the other party did not kill the dog, so they learned that there were two sick dogs, and they killed their own dogs respectively. If there are 3 sick dogs, the dog owner A, B, and C all see 2 sick dogs, so from the above reasoning, it is known that it is necessary to wait at least 2 days to determine whether their dog is a sick dog, for example, for A, he will observe whether B and C kill the dog the next day. In the same way, B and C did not kill the dog, so they all determined that their dog was a sick dog and killed it.

By analogy, if the number of sick dogs is n, the owner of the sick dog will always have to wait n-1 day to determine whether his dog is a sick dog.

Kill all your dogs, this is from a psychological point of view, because on the first day, everyone didn't see the sick dog, and wanted to see if anyone killed their dogs on the second day, so that their dogs didn't have to be killed, but the next day there was no gunshot, they would suspect that their dogs were sick, so they killed their dogs... Personally, there is no definite answer to this question...

It's all dead, and the reason has already been said.

Dogs with all kinds of diseases. Because one day the owner of the sick dog knows that nothing else is the same, and that is his own. One day, the owner of 2 sick dogs knows that the other is a sick dog, and the next day, there are 2 of them in their own house and that family.

Suppose the whole sick dog, the owner knows that the others are sick dogs on the first day but does not shoot them, then the next day is also his own. So there are two possibilities. But then said for a while, so rule out a possibility, left.

3 pcs. Some people saw three sick dogs and could wait for three days, while others saw two sick dogs and shot before the end of the third day.