Why did living things evolve so much, and is there any hope for the future of civilization?

Who ate the first bite of their kind? I'm afraid it starts when it's a microorganism, eating is to collect energy to sustain itself, if a tiger can get energy quickly and easily by eating meat, then why do you need to eat grass? Plants get the energy nutrients they need to grow from the sunlight in the soil, herbivores get energy nutrients from plants, and meat eaters get energy nutrients from herbivores.

Hungry? So if plants can live, why do we have to be grass or other plants if we can walk, move, and move? In fact, if you look at it, no matter which species it is, it is a predator, and the object of plunder is nature, if you really want to do this, LZ will not have such a problem, we don't exist anymore, and if you keep pushing forward, there will be nothing, and it is with the first to eat the same kind that there is a colorful world today.

So it doesn't matter who eats whom, what matters is why you eat, which tells us that there is more than one way to get the energy and the way to survive, and there are many questions with more than one answer.

From Darwin's point of view, all living things have a tendency to overreproduce, but the material in nature is limited, and organisms are not allowed to overreproduce, so there will be competition for survival between species, of course, there will be competition between species, with competition, there will be elimination, and those who are at a disadvantage will be destroyed, which is the law of nature. Therefore, even if it is a species, it will kill each other, in fact, in order to survive, no species is willing to perish, even if it is an individual, it will not be willing to be eliminated. So there will be competition.

If this law of nature is meant to reflect the mutual limitation of living things, I don't think that's quite right. I think it's because of this natural law that it reflects that organisms limit each other, and it's not that organisms have to limit each other, so there will be this natural law.

As for biodiversity, it is because there is a ...... of genetic diversity and ecosystem diversityIt seems like this.

There has been this pattern since the beginning of life, "eat each other.""It is a natural formation, and I think the main reason is the limitation of living space. If there is no biological A to eat other biological B, that is to say, biological B has no natural enemies, then biological B will reproduce indefinitely (the rate of reproduction of organisms without natural enemies is much higher than the natural death rate) until the earth is filled, and a large number of people will die or even become extinct after eating everything they can eat. The ultimate direction of human beings is different from that of dinosaurs, because humans invented cultivation and breeding, and formed civilization.

But it can also eat people in special circumstances, such as the Great Famine and the like.

It's because of the biological chain, and the laws of ecology.

There is competition between plants. Plants compete with each other for water, soil nutrients, and light. Competitive pollination methods, seed dispersal methods, and more.

No, the contradictions of human beings cannot be solved by cultural unity and mutual understanding, and so many people fight every day, each with its own reasons.

Economic sanctions, local wars will still exist.

Xiucai met soldiers, and it is unreasonable! The consequences are severe.

Humans are not the only intelligent beings, only arrogant humans think so.

No, evolution is a complex process that requires environmental geography to interact with each other. Moreover, evolution has the characteristics of going all the way to the black, and the current apes are too specialized, and the direct ancestors of humans have long been extinct.

Yes, as long as humans don't intervene and there is enough time.

Because of the extinction of the dinosaurs, human beings appeared, and if human beings perished, there will be more advanced creatures than humans, human intelligence is limited, and nature is the survival of the fittest.

Humans don't leave without killing all wild animals, and people are such things.

Animals can't be like humans!

No. First of all, although the earth is 4.5 billion years old, the natural conditions on the earth's surface in the first 2 billion years were extremely harsh and not enough to support the emergence of complex life. After the emergence of life, evolution is a long process, the history of human evolution is indeed only 180,000 years, but it took more than 1.5 billion years to evolve from single-celled organisms to apes (our ancestors), not to mention that there are several ice ages and mass extinctions in the middle to block and slow down the rate of evolution.

Secondly, because the available archaeological evidence does not support it. I think that if there really was a prehistoric and highly intelligent civilization, there is no reason why there is no trace of it from the perspective of archaeology until now. At the very least, there will always be a little bit left over from the artificial.

Let me give you an analogy, if humanity were to be completely wiped out now, for whatever reason, whether it would be a nuclear war, an asteroid, or a gamma-ray explosion. Do you think the next generation of humanity (if any) will find no trace of us at all? Our bodies will disappear, but we will be found all over the world with urban buildings, sturdy military engineering, plastic ceramics and glass objects that will never be destroyed.

It is not possible that there is not a trace of it, which is unreasonable and illogical. So I'd rather believe that aliens have been there before (at least this one is much more reliable), and I don't believe that there have been some inexplicable prehistoric civilizations on Earth. Choose the answer I am satisfied with, thank you.

I'll tell you responsibly, the genetic differences between individuals and humans are not as good as flies, that is, human beings are very similar, and even if they evolve, there will be no differences between individual human beings, and there will not be much difference in the functions of human beings, so no further evolution will break the checks and balances of human civilization.

All species are evolving.

All living things evolved from the most primitive life, and the process of evolution also led to the differentiation of species. The reason why human beings have developed a civilized society is that human beings can perform creative labor, and this is the main characteristic that distinguishes human beings from other animals in philosophy. Human evolution is the result of natural selection.

Evolve? All species are evolving, and if they don't evolve, they will be eliminated, and man has a well-developed brain and a dexterous hand, which is why man has become what he is now.

All species are evolving, but the evolution of the part is different, the benefits are different, the reason why human beings have become higher animals and rule the world, is because human evolution is the brain, the brain developed the hand is dexterous, accelerate the speed of development, other animals such as birds evolved wings, from the ground to the sky, also used a lot of time and energy. Dinosaurs evolved to be big, dogs evolved to have noses, and so on.

How do you know that the creatures of the earth only evolved and established civilizations, and other creatures did not evolve? How do you explain the unsolved mysteries of prehistoric civilizations? ? Think about it, 500 million years from now, will people (not us humans) be as puzzled as we are about the relics that we have survived?

They will also ask themselves: why are the creatures of the X-sphere only X (I don't know what they call themselves) to evolve and build civilization, why are other creatures not evolving and building civilization...

Because there are no two heavens and no two kings, how can human beings, who claim to be the rulers of nature, allow the emergence of civilizations with other creatures?

It is a natural phenomenon that an advanced civilization stifles or sprouts other backward civilizations.

All species are evolving.

It's just that the evolutionary direction is different.

Upstairs Ravages in the Dark - Assistant Level 2 It also makes sense, it is our human opinion that only man builds civilization, but there is no evidence that only man can build civilization is a fact.

Other creatures have evolved Humans don't understand the civilization of other creatures Humans have high IQs.