What are the advantages and disadvantages of the current examination system?

The advantage is that our students can easily do well in the exam (for those who are relatively good at the scores). Exceptions are made for very poor students. As long as you study more seriously, you can be more satisfied with the test.

But it's normal for you to play out of order. The teacher also taught it easily. You just need to tell everyone about the knowledge points.

Just explain the question clearlyTo cope with the current exam, you can proceed step by step. But the downside is huge.

That is, students will only rigidly accept knowledge. It's hard to innovate and discover. The main thing is that the teacher usually directly imprints the truth of the saying on the students' psychology.

This is also the result of our Chinese students in various international Olympiads. But you just can't come out of the master. Even masters like Ding Zhaozhong and Qian Xuelin have been able to improve only after receiving open education (hands-on education) abroad.

In short, the reason for this result is also caused by the rigidity of the exam. That's the downside.

The test-taking system results in questions coming from books, and the difficulty depends on the teacher who understands the book. The advantages generally do not exceed the scope of knowledge taught in the book, and the disadvantages are that the fixed topics are less flexible.

First of all, the time when the book was written was generally computer class.

and relevance, the test questions cannot go beyond the scope of the book, resulting in a single test question and insufficient flexibility.

This has led to the phenomenon that students mainly endorse.

It is a bit that it can cultivate a group of students who have a solid grasp of scientific knowledge, but the disadvantage is that it stifles students' interests and hobbies and students' innovative thinking and self-care ability.

The college entrance examination system is one of the basic systems for education, teaching and talent screening. From the perspective of the educational practice of restoring the college entrance examination system for more than 30 years, the college entrance examination system has played an important role in promoting educational development, ensuring educational fairness, and reconstructing educational order. However, the drawbacks of the current college entrance examination system are also obvious.

For example, the content of exams that focus on knowledge memorization and problem-solving skills has led to rote memorization and mechanical training flooding high school teaching. The centralized admission system abolishes the autonomy of higher education institutions and the right of choice of those who receive education, restricts competition among higher education institutions, and reduces the competitiveness of higher education. Some policies such as extra points in the college entrance examination, local score cut-offs, and designated special recruitment violate the principle of fairness in examinations and undermine educational fairness.

Many places regard the college entrance examination promotion rate as a political achievement, forming a single score evaluation and promotion rate orientation, resulting in the serious drawbacks of the "test-oriented education" of basic education of "teaching for the test and learning for the test", causing harm to the physical health, moral character, personality development and creativity of students, and is not conducive to the cultivation of innovative talents.

There are drawbacks, but what better way to be fairer than this?

It has created a large number of high-scoring and low-energy "talents", who will not be able to take care of themselves in the future when they go to social life.

I think there is a difference between today's examination system and that of the Tang Dynasty, but not much. The examination system of the Tang Dynasty tested the Four Books and Five Classics, and today it is nothing more than a little more, and it is not as rigid and old-fashioned as it used to be in some subjects, but I think it is also very rigid and has no aura in many subjects. However, I think the substance has not changed, it is simply to judge the quality of students based on test scores, which is very unscientific, but there is no way, China's national conditions determine many things.

If you want to ask me about the pros and cons, I think the pros and cons are that the current examination system can make us learn a lot and accept more extensively; The disadvantage lies in the fact that simply seeking people by points will lead to the emergence of "high-scoring and low-ability" people, who have no actual combat ability and are difficult to adapt to the needs of the current society.

Specifically, we should not simply "select people by points", but comprehensively consider all aspects of human factors, such as social experience, communication ability, innovation ability, etc., start from various aspects, comprehensively consider individual ability, and try to be fair. But I think this is not only a problem of the examination system, but also a problem of the entire education system, but also to be solved in connection with China's national conditions, this is not an overnight success, it takes a long process, do not rush, should follow the principle of step-by-step, "if you want to hurry, you can't reach it"!

As for how to better reflect the principle of fairness, I think that by changing China's current system of examination-oriented education, the principle of fairness will be more reflected.