The old man tripped over a dog leash and died, and it was rumored on the Internet that the woman wal

The main responsibility for the dog walker is that she not only steals the dog, but also harms others; Dog owners take a small part of the blame for not taking good care of their dogs.

The dog owner is primarily responsible because the care is not good. Women are minors and need a guardian to be responsible.

Since the dog walker died because the dog walked the old man and died, the dog walker needs to pay a certain amount of responsibility. The owner of the dog is also responsible for a certain amount of responsibility, after all, it is the death caused by the dog to the elderly.

The girl walking the dog is primarily responsible, and the dog owner is secondarily responsible. The girl walking the dog was not well supervised during the dog walk, and the consequences caused by it need to compensate the elderly.

1. Responsibilities to be borne by dog owners:

Article 79 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that if the animal violates the management regulations and fails to take safety measures for the animal and causes damage to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear the tort liability.

Article 83 stipulates that if an animal causes damage to others due to the fault of a third party, the infringed party may claim compensation from the animal keeper or manager, or may also claim compensation from the third party. After the animal keeper or manager makes compensation, he or she has the right to recover compensation from a third party.

Judging from the information available, the girl is sure that she is not the owner of the dog, nor is she the manager (referring to the situation of dog fostering, as the manager of the dog), but to play with the dog, then she is the third person mentioned in Article 83 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China.

The girl led the dog out to play and did not hold the dog, causing the dog to run and causing the old man to fall to the ground and die, which is the fault of a third party as mentioned in article 83.

According to the law of our country, as a dog owner, regardless of whether it is at fault or not, you must bear the corresponding responsibility, but in the end, whether it is the actual bearer, according to Article 83, the family of the elderly can ask the dog owner for compensation, and can also ask the girl's guardian to compensate.

It should also be noted that the dog owner leashed the dog in front of a big tree in front of the house, which made it easier for the girl to take the dog away, and the dog owner did not fulfill the management and control obligations. If the owner of the dog keeps the dog on a leash at home, and the girl takes the dog away from the owner's house without the consent of the owner, the nature is completely different.

2. The girl's guardian shall be held responsible:

Article 32: Guardian responsibility, where a person who lacks or has limited capacity for civil conduct causes harm to others, the guardian bears tort liability. Where guardians fulfill their guardianship responsibilities, their tort liability may be reduced. Where a person with property who lacks or has limited capacity for civil conduct causes harm to others, compensation is to be paid from his or her own property.

The guardian shall compensate for the shortfall.

As previously analyzed, according to Article 83 of the Tort Liability Law of the People's Republic of China, the girl is at fault of a third party and must be held responsible, but according to the official report, the girl who took the dog out this time is only 12 years old and has no civil capacity, and according to the law, the girl's guardian bears the corresponding responsibility.

An elderly man died suddenly after being knocked down by an unleashed dog, and the dog owner should bear the criminal responsibility for the tort and the victim's deathOf course, there is a certain premise for this, that is, this is indeed the case, and if there is no objection between the two parties, the dog owner should bear the responsibility, as for the specific punishment, it is still to be decided by the relevant court. Such an incident happened in Shunyi, Beijing, when the victim Aunt Wang was walking her dog in the community, she died suddenly because she was knocked down by another pet dog, but the course of the incident is not the same as the statements of both sides, and even very different, it is reported that after Aunt Wang was knocked down by a pet dog, she did not have any problems at that time, but suddenly fainted after returning home, and was finally sent to the hospital and died. <>

After the incident, Aunt Wang's family determined that her death was inextricably linked to being pounced on by a dogTherefore, his family sued the dog owner and demanded more than 80 yuan in compensation, and then the court also accepted the case. In the eyes of Aunt Wang's family, her sudden death was caused by the dog, and the other party's pastoral dog did not apply for a dog license and was not leashed, so this has a great relationship with the tragedy, and her own dog was licensed and leashed. <>

However, the defendant did not agree with this statement, arguing that Aunt Wang's sudden death was caused by her own underlying diseasesIt doesn't have much to do with its own dogs, therefore. You don't need to take responsibility yourself. It can be seen from the relevant monitoring** that the defendant did not tie his dog to a leash, and after the dog hit Aunt Wang, the defendant did not give any help to Aunt Wang, but left on his own with the dog, and Aunt Wang did get up by herself at that time, therefore, the defendant believes that Aunt Wang did not have much problem at that time, and his dog went because of her dog, therefore, he does not need to be liable.

In general, there are different opinions, but I believe that the court will give a relatively fair result, but what should be more noteworthy is that the dog must be leashed when walking, and the dog license should be processed, after all, accidents are often so sudden.

Take full responsibility, because after all, it is your own job to do such a thing, as the owner should take full responsibility and do a good job of dealing with the dog's behavior. It is only right to be responsible for the other party. After all, it's your own dog.

So there is a corresponding responsibility as well as loans.

Bear the corresponding criminal responsibility, and make corresponding compensation, pay the price for your own behavior, make a deep reflection, and be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment, and so on.

First of all, he has to bear a certain amount of criminal responsibility, after all, it is because of his mistakes that human life occurred, if he was careful, such a situation would not have occurred, and he must pay a certain amount of compensation to the victim's family, which can be regarded as a kind of compensation and admission of fault to them.

According to the pet management regulations, now go out to walk the dog without a dog leash is a violation, if this causes the dog to bite, the dog frightens the behavior, the dog mainly bears full responsibility, the dog owner accepts a serious warning once, and if it is repeated, it will be deprived of its right to raise a dog for life! At the same time, due to the accident affecting the normal traffic traffic, it will be fined.

should bear tort liability because not walking the dog correctly, resulting in loss and injury to others.

The dog owner's failure to comply with the regulations regarding dog ownership has a direct causal relationship with the sudden death of the elderly, and the dog owner must bear full responsibility for this.

The main responsibility should be borne first, first of all, to accept the punishment of the law, but also to apologize to the victim's family, and to make corresponding compensation.

The dog owner should take full responsibility, as there is now a law that requires the dog to be walked on a leash. The responsibility for causing this behavior is great for the dog owner.

There will be no punishment, and the families of the elderly have publicly stated that they will not be held accountable.

Subject to civil liability, but since she is only 12 years old, it is the responsibility of her guardian to educate the little girl.

Although the dog walking girl is responsible for a large part of this incident, because the dog walking girl is not yet 14 years old, she will not be held accountable, and she will be psychologically counseled to avoid any shadow on her.

Since the girl who walks the dog is not of the age of legal criminal responsibility, she is likely to be placed in custody and disciplined, and her parents will have to pay a certain amount of compensation.

Now the court has sentenced the accident, and since the little girl has not reached the legal age for sentencing, the matter is directly handed over to the dog owner, and they will bear the responsibility for this matter, and the girl will not have to bear criminal responsibility. But this matter is also difficult for the little girl to digest. Maybe she'll have nightmares every day.

The girl who leads the dog should not need to be in charge, because she is not over 14 years old and grew up in a divorced family, but I think the girl who leads the dog is responsible.

There is no need to be responsible, she is a minor, and the one who is responsible should be her guardian, who did not take good care of her.

The girl who led the dog has some responsibility, but it depends on the lawyer as an "accident". However, it is clear that from the perspective of the dog owner, the interim manager is responsible.

The girl who leads the dog needs to be responsible. Because it was the girl who didn't lead the dog, so such a tragic thing happened.

The girl who leads the dog is also responsible, and may be beaten and scolded by her parents. She caused a big incident, and her parents also need to compensate.

She is responsible, because she knows that she is too young to pull the dog, so that she can pull it out to play, which is very irresponsible, and if she is irresponsible, what if others follow this little girl's example.

However, according to the law, the minor is not allowed to walk the dog alone, so as the guardian of the minor, there is an unshirkable responsibility. As guardians, it is even more important to educate their children, especially minors, whose ignorance and ignorance are likely to bring very serious harm.