The old man tripped over a dog leash and died, the latest statement from the family No one will be h

It should have been an accident. The elderly tripped over a dog leash is not an accident caused by man-made intention, it is an accident, and it is difficult to pursue the legal responsibility of others.

The old man tripped over a dog leash and died, and the family's latest statement: no one will be held responsible.

The family's approach reflects the kindness and compassion of human nature, and the girl herself does not want an accident to happen, nor does she expect that an accident will happen. The family is considerate of the child, so they will not be held responsible.

However, as a girl walking the dog in question, I think she should learn a lesson, after all, such a big dog, without a good leash, walks on the street at will, is also an unknown danger to other people. Therefore, when walking the dog, the dog should not be let go of the leash.

If you don't hold accountable, the children of the old don't care about the lives of the elderly, because the children of true filial piety will not let the 88-year-old old man cross the road alone, and the children of the old man have long disliked the old man, so the old man is gone is the ideal result of being a child, so of course he is not held accountable, and he will immediately deal with the old man's funeral affairs quickly, without a little sadness and anger.

This family is still quite kind, after all, it is a human life that is not held accountable, and it is worth learning from the generosity spirit, and there is no wanton demand for compensation.

I'm so angry! I want to hit someone after watching **, I'm very, very, very angry as an outsider! For me, if the dog trips the old man at the first time, the person concerned will deal with it immediately, and I will be very angry and uncomfortable in the end.

However, it is a very kind act not to hold the family accountable, and as an outsider, we have no right to interfere.

Personally, I think that the family members are kind people, and since the accident has happened, I don't want to talk about others. Because the big dog is for the little girl (about ten years old) to pull the dog out, when the big dog chases the puppy, the girl can't hold back and let go, which leads to the tragedy in **.

The family of the old man was kind, because the child's actions in the accident were not intentional, and the old man had passed away and no longer demanded compensation from the responsible party.

The family stated that they would not be held responsible, and hoped that everyone would stop reporting and commenting too much, wishing the deceased to rest in peace, and also giving the 12-year-old girl a chance. I believe that this accident will give the dog owner, the little girl and the girl's family a painful education. It also reminds us that the general public should also take protective measures while keeping pets.

Respect any decision of the family as I am an outsider. Don't say anything that doesn't pay attention to the elderly. Could it be that the old man is gone, and he will pay attention to the old man when he asks for money?

What kind of logic is this, the elderly are well taken care of in the world, it is better than anything else. The old man is gone, and it is also a bluff in the grand ceremony. Respect the family's decision, because you say kind.

Pushing the boat down the river, the old man was originally a burden to them, and he was tripped and died by a passing dog chain just so coincidentally, which just happened to their liking, so the little girl would not be held responsible.

Accidents, no worries, no complaints, the little girl doesn't want it, the dog doesn't want it, everyone doesn't want this kind of thing to happen.

The family stopped pursuing it, because they didn't want to ruin the other two families.

The family of the elderly spared the children who had no financial compensation and were kind and generous. But this incident should be a wake-up call for irresponsible people who like to have dogs.

I think the family is still a very sensible person, after all, no one wants such a thing to happen, it's just an accident, and now society really needs such a sensible person.

If responsibility is not pursued, the judiciary has an obligation to clarify the responsibility for this matter.

This incident has been judged to be an accident, and the girl did not mean it, since the family is not pursuing it, everyone doesn't have to pay too much attention to it, after all, the two families want to live quietly.

The old man died after tripping over a dog leash Follow-up: The family waived compensation and will not be held responsible.

The old man is gone, it is impossible to resurrect, and they are all sad. The little girl is still a minor, she still has a long way to go, and it was an accident that shouldn't have happened.

The reality of the situation is well understood that the pursuit of criminal responsibility may be a failure.

I think there's another reason for not being held accountable, or because I think the elderly are a burden.

If you don't pursue it, it's not necessarily a good thing.

It just so happens that there is no need to support the elderly, and they silently thank the little girl's eight generations of ancestors in their hearts.

A man who has righteousness in his heart