The old man tripped over a dog leash and died, and was characterized as an accident, what do you thi

First of all, we need to clarify a concept, what is an accident? An accident in law refers to the occurrence of an accident or injury, and the occurrence of loss has nothing to do with the subjective will of the person.

In this case, the dog rope tripped the old man and died, the occurrence of this damage is what everyone does not want to see, and it is not expected by both parties, from this point of view, both parties are not at fault, and it seems reasonable to identify it as an accident, however, imagine that if there is no dog leash to trip the old man, will the old man die because of this? Isn't the death of the old man unrelated to the dog's manager?

Obviously not, according to the provisions of the relevant laws of our country, if the animal is raised and causes damage to people, the owner and manager of the animal shall be liable for compensation. This means that even if the dog owner is not at fault, he is liable for compensation for the injury caused by the dog he raised, which is clearly stipulated in the law, and from the perspective of criminal law, this case obviously cannot be identified as a criminal case, but can only be said to be an accident, so the dog owner cannot be held criminally responsible, but the civil liability for compensation cannot be exempted.

Completely oppose the statement of accidents, because the matter of walking the dog and tying the rope has been said for a long time, and the leash is not led, which is called knowingly committing a crime, and the crime is added to the first degree.

Nonsense, the typos are out, this is definitely not an official report, whether you are criminally responsible depends on the type of dog, if it is a large fierce dog that belongs to the prohibited range, it may bear intentional legal responsibility, even if it is locked in a cage and hurts people, it is considered deliberate, not to mention that it ran to the street to cause death, this is not clear, so this is not an official report, wait and see!

This must only be an accident, no one deliberately used a dog leash to tie the old man's feet, as for whether the compensation can be large or small, it depends on whether the family of the deceased is a person with a conscience.

**The accident is not to say that the dog owner is not responsible, because this is due to the dog owner did not take care of his dog and caused the old man to fall and die, although it cannot be judged as intentional homicide, but at least there is relevant responsibility, compensation, funeral expenses are indispensable.

Personally, I think it's an accident! Because a 12-year-old girl has complete control over what she does! Didn't your money fall from the sky, bear fruit on trees, and grow on the ground? Accidents are inevitable! Let's face it sensibly and soberly! The dead go all the way, okay!

This is something that no one wants to happen, and the owner of the dog does not have this kind of malicious behavior, and it is normal to have a qualitative accident, but it must also bear the corresponding responsibility

The characterization of an accident is a determination of criminal liability and a determination of whether a criminal case has been filed, but it does not preclude civil liability.

The family of the elderly did not pursue the case, and suggested that the family of the little girl properly educate the child and actively participate in the compensation of the family of the elderly for the loss ......There are also dog owners who are also appropriately compensated for the losses of the elderly's families.

The old man tripped over a dog leash, and the owner of the dog had a certain relationship. When you come out to walk the dog, you must use a leash to keep the dog on a leash. Now that the old man has passed away, it is best for the two families to mediate to resolve the issue, because Tengu is a little girl, and he can't control it.

This is an accident, because it was knocked down by a dog leash, which is unpredictable by people, but the dog owner ran away as soon as he saw the old man knocking down, and the owner of the dog should bear this responsibility.

Judging from this incident alone, it can be regarded as an accident, but the consequences are very serious, the old man was killed by the dog leash, no one could have imagined this result, the old man's family wanted to sue the dog owner and the woman who ran out to chase the dog.

It is indeed an accident, but it is not advisable to not actively respond to emergencies and cause a certain negative impact.

I don't hate dogs, but I hate having dogs that don't matter what is good. Especially large dogs. Once it causes an accident, it will not be small. There's nothing wrong with having a dog, but it's wrong to have an accident. At the very least, it should be punished as negligence causing death.

Although it is characterized as an accident, the civil compensation part is certainly essential. It depends on how the two parties negotiate, and if one party is not satisfied, they may also resort to law. (Part of the news, **** to the people**).

It must have been an accident, and dog owners don't want it to happen. However, if the dog is not on a leash and does not take care of your large dog, you should be fully responsible, and you should be punished in accordance with the relevant regulations for violating the city's ban on raising large dogs!

Why did the little girl ignore the old man after tripping the old man, but walked away and then ran away, it was an accident before, and then she deliberately ignored it.

I don't know what the rules are in other cities, but Chengdu's "Chengdu Dog Management Regulations" explicitly prohibit minors from walking dogs.

It was an accident! But how did this event happen?? Why are dogs pulled out to slip away?

The little girl only pulled this time, or twice or three times, ......If it's okay once, it's forgivable that she's naughty! If you are pulled out to walk the dog many times, it means that the dog owner is negligent in managing the responsibility, and the girl's parents are also negligent in managing their own children's responsibilities!

I don't agree with the official answer, I think it should be manslaughter. Because he had a dog and did not take good care of it, after tripping the old man, he did not treat it in time, but called the dog to escape, and eventually caused the old man's death. So it should be manslaughter.

I feel that the dog with a rope knocked people down and died, I think this is not an accident is caused by man, if the dog owner holds the dog leash, there will be no such problem, so it must be compensated, because now the dog is included in the law, the dog is killed by a person must be compensated, and the car hit and killed must be compensated, so the dog trips over a person and dies should also be compensated,

Although it is an accident, the dog owner must be fully responsible, and such a sad thing will not happen if the rope is not taken off.

I don't think so, I also look at this **, no matter what, you should be responsible for the dog you raise, no matter what the reason is, after the dog that this girl watched hit the old man, she didn't go to see how the old man was, and she ran away quickly, is the owner of the dog too irresponsible.

There are many accidents, who caused it is responsible, you say that it is an accident, it will be fine, after all, the accident caused the death of a person, and all the responsibility is the responsibility of the dog owner.

The dog owner should be responsible, and the child is small, which can be borne by the parents, and the elderly family can be compensated for some money.

No one knew when the accident would come, because a dog's leash tripped the old lady and lost her life, which is sad. I hope that dog owners will pay attention to managing their dogs and not have tragedies like this happening again.

I think it was a death caused by negligence. It is the cause of the accident caused by the child not holding the rope properly. The owner of the dog bears the primary responsibility.

It shows that this girl is too unsympathetic, and she tripped the old man by leading a dog, and also gave the old man his life. It really shouldn't.

I think the dog owner has a very big responsibility because he didn't walk the dog properly, which caused the dog to pounce on the old man.

I think that although both sides are responsible, most of them are the responsibility of the ropeless dog, and the dog walkers have really become more and more presumptuous these years, and they must be severely punished. Maybe the old man will live a few more years without a dog.

For this case, I think the owner of the dog should bear part of the responsibility, after all, it was the dog that directly pounced on the old man, resulting in the sudden death of the old man, and the owner of the dog needs to bear most of the responsibility.

I think the dog owner should be mainly responsible, because he didn't leash the dog, and as a result, the dog ran out and tripped the old man, which was the dog owner's dereliction of duty.

The first point, I feel that it is normal for me to go out to walk the dog on a leash, the second point is that the other party is still unreasonable, I think such a person is very immoral, the third point is that the old man is dead, then the dog owner must bear some responsibility.

In such a case, the owner should be blamed for not leashing his dog. All the responsibility should be borne by this master.

I think in this case, the dog owner is responsible for a large part of the responsibility, because he did not wear a leash when walking the dog, which is also a vicious dog hurting people.

Relatives and friends said that the girl pulled the dog out, and the big dog couldn't let go when chasing the puppy, and then the old man tripped over the dog leash and died.

"We don't need help, we just want to deal with this quietly".

The family of the elderly said that they would not be too responsible, and they did not need help, and they just wanted to deal with this matter quietly, and the family members were kind and kind.

His relatives and friends responded who should be responsible for this incident, after all, the old man tripped over a dog leash and died, and he must be held responsible.

Relatives and friends said that they wanted to deal with this matter in a low-key manner, and they didn't want to attract excessive attention from **. According to witnesses at the scene, relatives and friends were relatively calm.

The relatives and friends of the elderly hope that the other party's family can make compensation, after all, it is because of their old age that they will die.

His relatives and friends responded that the girl took the dog out to play because she saw it cute. The family of the elderly also said that they would not hold the girl accountable.

Since the dog was brought out by the girl, if the girl led the dog out without the consent of the dog owner, the dog owner should not be held responsible. But if the dog owner knows that the girl took the dog out, then the dog owner must be responsible.

No one in this case needs to be held criminally responsible, and civil compensation depends on the attitude of the elderly family, who can claim compensation from the dog owner, or from the child's guardian, and if the dog owner claims compensation, the dog owner can recover from it.

As a host, such a responsibility should also be assumed. Because there is no guardianship of the dog. So there is a need to take responsibility.

Absolutely. Since you have a dog, you have to be responsible for it. Some dogs are large and aggressive, and they should be kept on a leash when taking the dog out to avoid causing harm to others.

Dog owners should hold the dog on a leash and not let it run on the street.

According to the laws of our country, the dog owner is partially responsible, and the girl is primarily responsible.

You must be responsible, after all, it is yours, but if you don't play a role in caregiving, you will have to bear the consequences of poor care.