Why did the UK leave the European Union? Why do you still need to negotiate and just declare that it

Because the UK's economic interests have been greatly damaged, and the EU is also saying that it will go, and there are many follow-up issues, so it will definitely have to be negotiated.

Brexit, in fact, was because their masses were just playing at the time.

The main reason is that there are interests in it, so it must be divided slowly, and you can't leave all at once.

Maybe I want to get better economic development, but I have been in it for a long time, and there are too many entanglements of interests.

Britain's action, which has been in the alliance for so long, involves too many things.

The main thing is to get the most out of it, and to have the right to take the lead when negotiating with others.

Brexit is still subject to negotiations, not just exit.

Because maybe the big powers still have to discuss it.

The EU also has poor countries that need bailouts from other wealthy member states, and the EU intends to force Britain to join the EU from the power of the United StatesBritain felt that it was not getting the benefits it deserved, but it had to help the poor, and it had to leave the big tree of the United States, so it had a negative attitudeOn the other hand, Britain wants to dominate the EU like Germany and France, and does not want to abolish the pound and really assume its responsibilities in the EU! There are other factors, such as history and political and political reasons.

1. Because of the increasing number of immigrants in the UK, the employment in the country is becoming more and more severe.

2. The immigrant population is increasing, and in order to ensure social welfare, the pressure is increasing (it is not easy to do).

3. In order to maintain its original high welfare, Britain wants to unilaterally raise the standards for the immigrant population, but the EU does not allow it.

4. There are too many countries in the EU whose economies have not reached high standards, but they want to implement high social welfare in their own countries, which is tantamount to increasing the burden on other countries (Britain has borne what it should not have shouldered).

5. The EU is not born in the UK, it was jointly founded by Germany and several other countries, and the UK only joined the EU later (since it is not my own birth, and it is disobedient, hum).

6. The UK's strength is in the forefront of Europe, and it has the strength to compete with the EU.

Reasons for Brexit:

First, Britain has maintained a sense of superiority over the European continent for a long time, and has always been reluctant to part with European integration. Britain sees itself as a global power outside of Europe, and sees its uniqueness as the reason for its rise and strength. Although it gradually weakened, the sense of superiority was still strong, and after World War II, every time there was a setback or crisis, Britain became suspicious of Europe, blaming the European Union or the European Union for the problem.

This time, the outbreak of the financial crisis and the European debt crisis has torn apart the rift between Britain and the European continent.

Second, the UK pays high dues in the EU, but does not get a corresponding return. The amount of money paid by the UK to the EU is around 100 million pounds per week, which is roughly the average for Britons, and the annual EU membership fee for each person is about £130. What is even more unpleasant to the British is that after the financial crisis, some eurozone countries reduced their contributions, resulting in a significant increase in the proportion of British contributions.

The EU's response to the European debt crisis has made the British feel like they are using British taxpayers' money to save "troubled countries".

Third, EU law is too restrictive, and the EU law governing towels, bread and milk has separate ones. The Court of Justice of the European Union has jurisdiction over everything from the UK expulsion **** to the price of beer. 53% of the laws and regulations in force in the UK

Originating from the EU, and the British can do little to stop the EU's poor legislation. The large EU regulatory system has restricted the UK from entering into free agreements** with other countries such as China, India, and the US, as well as the development of UK industries.

Fourth, since the eastward expansion of the European Union, the number of net immigrants in the UK has continued to grow. In 2015, the number of net migrants in the UK increased to 10,000, of which the number of immigrants from EU countries was 10,000, a record high. In the midst of the economic downturn, immigrants are considered to be the "main culprits" of crowding out welfare, housing, health care and education resources.

Johnson, the former mayor of London, who advocates Brexit, said that the only way for Britain to control the number of immigrants is to leave the European Union.

Fifth, Europe is facing a refugee crisis, and Britain does not want to get involved. Millions of refugees broke into Europe last year, and 1.3 million migrants applied for asylum in the UK, of which 363,000 were from Syria. Accommodating these refugees will not only be a drag on the economy, but will also pose a security risk to society.

First, the United Kingdom needs to pay a very high membership fee to the European Union every year, and in the EU budget, the proportion of the British contribution accounts for about 1 8, second only to Germany and France.

Second, a large number of immigrants have entered the UK to seize job opportunities;

Third, the EU is open to refugees, but the UK is conservative.

Fourth, because the UK is not fully integrated into Europe, it has not been able to enjoy many conveniences, such as the euro;

British Prime Minister Theresa May (Theresa May) officially informed the EU on the 29th that the UK had started the Brexit process. Foreign media have summarized several of the most difficult issues that the two sides will carefully scrutinize.

1.Break-up fee

According to the EU**, the UK will need to pay around €55 billion to €60 billion for Brexit. This amount covers a number of unfulfilled commitments made by the UK in the past. But the UK** may be reluctant to agree.

One of the main arguments of the Brexit camp is to stop making payments to the EU, so any large payments will be politically unpopular.

2.process

The UK and the EU disagree on how long the withdrawal process will last and the order in which the negotiations should follow. While May has said she wants to conclude negotiations on the future relationship between the UK and the EU within two years, the EU** has said this is unlikely. The EU also said that the two sides must agree on key terms of Brexit in the early stages of negotiations before they can set the rules for the future relationship, which may be negotiated separately after Brexit.

3.Citizens of EU countries residing in the UK and British citizens residing in EU countries.

Both the UK and the EU have said that allowing UK citizens to remain in EU countries and allowing EU citizens to remain in the UK should be a priority in the early stages of negotiations after Brexit. But there are many complications. The UK may not want to provide EU citizens with full rights and benefits in perpetuity, and some EU** with a large population in the UK are likely to demand it.

The UK** has also said that they are considering restricting the rights of people newly arriving in the UK before Brexit, a position that the EU** and MPs have said would prevent the UK from meeting its membership obligations before it officially leaves.

4.Market.

May has said she wants Britain to have the widest possible access to the EU's large market. The EU** said that the UK could not enjoy the same treatment as member states after Brexit, and that duty-free access to the EU market for goods and services depended on recognition of the right to free movement of EU workers. The EU also argues that the UK should retain EU regulations or meet equivalent standards if it wants to retain its broad tariff-free access to its market.

The United Kingdom, for its part, said it would like to have the freedom to set its own rules and laws in the future, without being bound by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

5.Financial services.

Under current EU law, banks are allowed to sell products from London to EU customers with minimal regulation. While the UK wants to retain these rights and maintain London's status as a global financial centre (possibly with the help of a free** agreement that would give UK financial services access to EU markets), leaving the EU could mean losing those rights. May has made it clear for the first time that she wants to enter into a financial services agreement as part of a future agreement with the EU**.

Among them, according to reports from Europe, this time the UK's departure from the EU has reached an impasse, mainly because the two sides have not been able to reach an agreement on some agreements after leaving the EU, so the UK's departure from the EU has not yet been decided. However, the main concern is that the UK was so active in joining the EU, why is it suddenly withdrawing now? For this problem, I will analyze it from the following points.

Joining and Exiting.

In fact, the reason why Britain was able to join the EU at the beginning was mainly because the EU had a huge market, and the UK's productivity was still very good at that time, so Britain joined the EU at that time, hoping to digest its own production through the huge European market. At that time, Britain could be said to have made great progress with the European Union, helping it to recover its post-war economy. But at the same time, as the EU continues to grow, there are a number of member states that have a variety of problems.

And these countries that are also part of the EU have to bear some responsibilities, and the UK obviously does not want to take these responsibilities before announcing its departure from the EU. <>

What do you think of the UK's approach?

To tell the truth, Britain's approach is actually very wise, after all, for a country, its own interests must be put first, so after learning that the EU does not have much use value, Britain directly chose to leave the EU, and the current situation in the EU is actually very embarrassing, on the one hand, Europe is within the scope of Germany's industrial production, and France has a strong voice in the entire EU. Therefore, Britain can only be in a passive position here, so it will choose to secede. <>

Is it possible to get out of success?

In fact, from all aspects of the conversation, we can know that the EU does not actually want Britain to leave directly, so it has postponed the time of secession, and the determination of the British side to secede has been shown, so in the end it will definitely be able to leave the EU, after all, for Britain, it still belongs to a free country and can determine its own political position.

First of all, they don't want to be constrained by the EU anymore, and Britain sees itself as a strong country that doesn't need to be constrained by an alliance, and feels that it will develop better if it leaves the EU.

Because Britain thinks that it gets too little in the EU, in other words, to put it simply, Britain gives a lot of money, but the EU does not give him as much in return.

It may be because they feel that leaving the EU is good for them and will help them develop better.

Due to a number of factors, Britain has always wanted to leave the European Union, but it has not succeeded for such a long time. After all, for Britain to gain the EU, the rupture of the relationship between the two sides also means that the European landscape has changed. According to foreign media reports, in the latest negotiations, the UK and the EU have obviously not reached an agreement, and the two sides may break up.

In this regard, I will do the following. <>

Why does the UK want to leave the EU?

In the last century, Britain did not want to leave the European Union, after all, at that time, Britain could get huge benefits from the European Union, after all, at that time, the European Community could help British products sell quickly, and then accumulate a large amount of foreign exchange reserves for them. However, with the continuous influx of Western refugees, the EU needs to provide a lot of financial support to solve the problem of refugees, so Britain has always wanted to be independent from the EU. <>

The two sides have not reached an agreement on what to do.

Although the center of gravity of the EU is now occupied by Germany and France, in fact, Britain's position in Europe is still very lofty, and Britain's independence is also a big loss for the EU, so the two sides have been negotiating on the relationship after secession, and Britain wants to ensure that it can still enjoy a certain exchange rate stability after secession. At the same time, it ensures that the markets of both sides are open to a certain extent, so that British goods can enter the European market. But for such a good thing, the EU obviously will not agree, which has also led to the two sides have been unable to talk.

How do you view the relationship between the two parties?

In fact, in my opinion, whether it is the UK or the EU, if the two sides cooperate well, they can still be mutually beneficial, but the UK is bent on leaving the EU, but it wants the whole of Europe to pay for its products, which is obviously unrealistic. So after the failure of this negotiation, Britain is likely to leave the EU strongly.

Because Scotland does not want to leave the European Union, because Scotland has enjoyed various preferences in the European Union and has developed its own economy, so the United Kingdom wants to leave the European Union at the same time that Scotland wants to leave the United Kingdom.

Scotland was part of England in the 18th and early 19th centuries, and because Britain was a powerful country in the world, it was said that he benefited the most from it. With the development of British industry and commerce, Scotland, as part of the United Kingdom, benefited greatly, but later with the strong rise of Germany, British interests were greatly disturbed. After World War II, the British economy faced great problems, resulting in the loss of a large number of Indian colonies, and the resources needed for development gradually decreased, so Scotland also found a lot of damage.

With the continuous emergence of difficulties in the economic development of the United Kingdom, England not only did not give some subsidies to Scotland, but also asked Scotland to provide him with a large amount of resources, so Scotland said that it could not accept it.

The Scottish region has a lot of oil resources, so even if it is separated from the United Kingdom, it can survive on its own. Another reason why Scotland wants to break away from Britain is because Scotland believes that since oil is in the territory of Scotland, they should enjoy the various profits brought by oil, rather than leaving it to Britain to control, and they have always had a big problem with this matter. Coupled with the fact that the UK wants to leave the EU recently, this is very bad news for Scotland, once it leaves the EU, then Scotland will not be able to enjoy the various benefits that it previously enjoyed in the EU, so.

Scotland wanted to break away from the United Kingdom.

Scotland and the UK have always had a very big contradiction, and the reason why they have not left is probably because the time has not yet come, and now the UK wants to leave the European Union, giving them a just right time, so they are now leaving the UK at this time.