Do you say it s 4 pairs or 81 points??

Comparatively speaking, 4 pairs are more difficult and difficult, according to the data of the landlord, it can be said that it is a quasi-5 pairs, although there are 3 4 pairs in NBA history, and only 2 81 points or more (there is a 70+ Although it is brushed out.) But the 4 doubles are not only a test of the player's all-round type, but also the rebounding ability of teammates and opponents, the offensive ability of teammates, the offensive ability of the enemy, etc!! And the score is a test of the player's personal touch and the enemy's defensive intensity!

But no matter what you say, being able to get 81+, or 4 pairs, can be said to be the best in the NBA, which is commendable, and this is not something that ordinary people can accomplish. Especially in today's increasingly strong basketball skills, emphasizing physical confrontation without losing defensive intensity! Personal opinion, see the laughter

Judging from the scene, it is more difficult to have four pairs. However, in practice, 81 points is more difficult. If you want to score 81 points in a game, many people say that you can score points with the number of shots, which is a very unrealistic idea.

If you want to score 81 points, it doesn't matter if you have enough shots, but it depends on whether you can get that number of shots, when you score about 50 points, the opponent will definitely take care of you, whether your physical strength can receive the ball under this kind of high-intensity defense, and shoot to score. All kinds of factors, if you want to score 81 points, it is too demanding for a person's scoring ability.

It's hard ...

Very few people can do it.

4 pairs are difficult, scoring can mainly rely on themselves, but 4 pairs also depend on teammates and opponents, one is to take your fate into your own hands, and the other is half in your own hands and half in the hands of others, which do you say is more difficult. Nonsense, of course 4 pairs are difficult!

Four doubles are difficult, 81 points can rely on the number of shots and free throws, and the four doubles must be more comprehensive.

It must be 81 points, and the number of people who have reached four doubles is more than 81 points.

Of course, it's four pairs of difficult.

81 points, if you have to discuss it with your teammates, give yourself more chances to shoot.

4 double-double scoring assists can be negotiated with teammates, it's easy, but rebounds, steals are difficult, your teammates are willing, opponents are definitely unwilling!

It's hard, but if you want to talk about who is harder, I personally think:

1.From a psychological (pressure) point of view, Maddy's 35.13 minutes is more difficult, because no one forced Kobe to score 81 points, Kobe himself is a very relaxed mind to score, and Maddy's game is very important for the Rockets, and Maddy himself wants to use the victory to prove that he is in the Magic team"Scoring champion"It's not fake, to prove that the Rockets are worth it to use Francis, the former big name, to make weights for themselves, and the strong desire to win and prove himself is to order him to lead the Rockets to win, which shows the huge psychological pressure on Maddie at that time!

2.From a historical point of view, Kobe's 81 points are more difficult, because there have been many such miracles like Maddie in history, typified by the 1995 Madison Square Garden in New York"Miller moments", and no one has scored more than 70 since Chamberlain! The record of scoring more than 70 points has been sealed for nearly 47 years!

Maddie has no doubt about it! 35.13 seconds is not something that ordinary people can take! Shooting is simply not time to think about it is a rush! If it were replaced by Kobe, it would definitely be an impossible task!!

81 points in a single game, that's the opponent is a garbage team! Maddie beats Spurs!! Can it be compared???

Is Kobe Bryant as powerful as Chamberlain's 100 points in a single game!! 35 seconds and 13 minutes, so far, Maddie is left alone in the present!!

It's hard for both, but I prefer Kobe's 81 points, after all, he's going crazy for 48 minutes, and Wheat is only crazy for 35 seconds, and Kobe can score 13 points in 35 seconds, but Maddie can't score 81 points, I agree!!

T-MAC is difficult, when T-MAC feels good, if there is a high number of shots as Kobe, it can also score 81 points, and it may be higher, but everyone knows that no one in the league will be so lonely except Kobe!

Of course Kobe Bryant is harder! The question is too simple. Then you can also ask, is it Miller's 8 seconds and 8 minutes or Chamberlain's 100 points? In fact, it depends on who you like, and who you will naturally support! I support Kobe!

How so? In terms of data alone, of course, 35 seconds and 13 minutes is incredible, because time is irresistible, and no one can slow down the process of time.

In terms of technical difficulty, it should be more difficult with a score of 81. Because 81 points would have at least 27 three-point attempts, or double-point attempts, or 81 free throws. When playing NBA games, if all the indicators are not adjusted, it is difficult to score 81 points in the game if you use a high difficulty level.

And from the perspective of the background of the game, Maddy's 13 points and Kobe's 81 points are all regular season, which can be said to be an inconsequential game.

In this way, defense can be ignored, and there are no tactical fouls. 35 seconds allows an average street player to make four round-trip 3-pointers plus one free throw. Finish Maddie's way.

And you ask yourself, if you were given 48 minutes, would you be able to shoot 81 points the way Kobe Bryant?

T-Mac is even harder, because nearly 20 of Kobe's 81 points are to please the home crowd, and T-Mac's 13 points are the key to victory, not a single point less!

It should be the difficulty of the wheat, it depends on luck, and Kobe's 81 points are based on strength.

It is difficult for T-MAC to score 13 points in 35 seconds, and 35 seconds is a lot of psychological pressure!!

Of course it is 13 points of wheat....Luck is also strength....Wheat 35 seconds only....Is Bryant's 81 points the first? It's not....

It's hard to score 13 points in 35 seconds. Because there's a steal in it. And the steal is the hardest.

It's hard ... All are epic achievements.

It's hard. It's all simple.

I think Kobe can score 13 points in 35 seconds, but McDie can't score 81 points.

I think Kobe Bryant can score 13 points in 35 seconds, while Maddie can't score 81 points!!

I really hope Yao Ming can partner with Kobe!!

It's hard to say, maybe Kebi can't do it in 35 seconds, maybe Maddie can't get 81 points!

Let's decide: "Is it hard for Kobe to score 81 points, or is it difficult for T-Mac to score 13 points in 35 seconds?" "It's too hard.

I heard about Maddie's 35 seconds, and God was also moved???

Kobe Bryant is more difficult because.

In terms of position, Sgorsf is the Sgorsf, while Zhang is the C is the master of the basketball court, and everyone knows that it is easier to score points under the basket than the heavy head.

In terms of height, Zhang is obviously much taller than Ko, so it's easier to score, and in terms of age, Zhang is in the 60s, that is in the NBA, there are too few defensive giants, and Koe is in the 21st century, needless to say.

In the end, in terms of time, Zhang played the whole game, while Ko played three and a half quarters, and finally concluded that it was more difficult for Kobe to score 81 points.

KB is difficult, after all, the defensive intensity is much stronger now than before, and he only took less than 40 minutes, while Zhang Bo took the full 48 minutes.

I know you've got 3-pointers in mind, but think about it: Chamberlain won't shoot from a distance, and the three-point line is useless for him.

Bryant! At that time, Chamberlain's height was a notch higher than any of the other major NBA leagues! And now it's different (Kobe Bryant isn't high) and the rules of basketball were different!

o(∩_o..

Chamberlain was a teammate for the sake of data to make data.

It doesn't count!

You already have the answer in mind.

As long as you like it, it's fine.

Such comparisons are difficult and can be said to be incomparable.

1: The two lived in different eras. There is a big difference in the training method and nutritional intake of athletes.

2: The way the game is played has also changed a lot. First of all, the rules are very different, and the three-second zone rule was made because of Chamberlain.

The defensive intensity of the Chamberlain era was far less than that of the current era (the current NBA defensive mainstream was established by the Pistons of Beal, Lambie, and the Bulls of the Jordan era), and the internationalization of basketball also made it possible for even NBA players with super ability to focus on overall offense and defense.

3: It can only be said that Chamberlain stood out from the crowd in that era. In this era, Kobe is well-rounded, has outstanding awareness, and is better in all aspects, but if he wants to do more, he must rely on a team with overall combat ability.

It seems that the Lakers are slowly developing in that direction.

Kobe Chamberlain scored easily at that time and the defensive intensity was not enough.

Kobe, of course, basketball was not defensive in the Chamberlain era.

Of course, it was easier for Chamberlain to score 100 points.

1.In the Chamberlain era, the defensive intensity was small, and when Kobe played the Raptors, the double bag was 2Chamberlain won comfortably, while Kobe fought back when his team was behind.

It took less than three sessions.

Bryant!

There are so many modern rules!! 1

Plus the level of modern basketball has increased!!

Zhang didn't have some rules at that time

1. All people are like this, if they like their idols, they only look at their good side, and when others say a little offend, they will be uncomfortable.

This is the most excessive in Komi.

Anyway, Kobe Bryant still has 3 quarters and 62 points, 4 games 50+, 9 games 40+

It's better than Maddie's fans who will only take 35.13 seconds to say things.

Because Chamberlain is already in the past, the NBA game in Chamberlain's time is different from the current game rules, and the current rules are even more difficult, and many people don't know Chamberlain.

Because ......Didn't Chamberlain all retire, what did he say?

Kobe Bryant's 81 points is really a ...... of NB

Chamberlain was in the 60s of the last century. Many people don't know that

IELTS Study Steps:

1.The optimal amount of words to memorize should be between 200 and 300 per day.

2.Choose an IELTS vocabulary book and memorize it in weekly increments.

3.Monday reads the first word of each page, in other words, it takes 200 pages to complete the task of memorizing 200 words.

4.The speed of turning the page should be fast, and each word is just a glance, and you can't be nostalgic. Guaranteed to read these 200 words in 5 minutes.

5.Choose ten of these 5 minutes a day to memorize these 200 words over and over again. These ten 5 minutes must not be consecutive, but ten 5 minutes at different times of the day and in different scenes, the more special the scene, the better the effect.

6.Don't memorize words in regular time; The average person wastes more than 20 5 minutes a day to pick up 10 of them and use them to memorize words; Regular time is used to learn other knowledge, and regular time is the least effective at memorizing words (this is due to psychological reasons).

7.Tuesday looks at the second word on each page while slanting at the first word with your peripheral vision. It is not allowed to look at the first one with the positive light, otherwise the time cannot be controlled within 5 minutes.

8.And so on, by Friday, it's a thousand words, and it's reviewed on Saturday and Sunday; Start next week with a new thousand, be sure to move forward.

9.After a few months, I memorized an IELTS vocabulary book, and the effect was that I knew about 20% of them (assuming I didn't know any of them), or even less. But don't memorize the book again, be sure to change the book, change to another version of the IELTS book (this is very important psychologically).

Shanghai Lange Training Center provides.

The biggest difference between TOEFL and IELTS is that I think that if you are not very good at the computer-based test, the IELTS face-to-face test will make you more stressful, but in terms of vocabulary, IELTS is relatively simple, and IELTS also has some machine experience.

Personally, I think it's all about the same, but the teachers in the new channel are more loving and have a better service attitude.

About the difference between IELTS and TOEFL exams.

Speaking In IELTS, candidates have a face-to-face conversation with an examiner. However, for the new TOEFL test, first of all, the test format is human-computer dialogue; Secondly, each question requires the test taker to answer within the specified time (in the new TOEFL test, the short question needs to be answered within 45 seconds, and the long question needs to be answered within 1 minute), so the test taker has no rest or buffer time in the process of answering, as long as the timer starts, the test taker must answer within the specified time. Therefore, from the perspective of speaking, the new TOEFL test has stricter time requirements.

In terms of reading, the difficulty difference is not very large. But in some ways, the new TOEFL test is much easier to read than IELTS. Because the IELTS test includes 9 mainstream question types, it is relatively complex.

WritingWhen it comes to writing, the new TOEFL is simpler. The reason for this is that in the new TOEFL Writing test, there is only one question type - do you agree or disagree, while the IELTS test will have 4 question types. At the same time, there are also relatively large differences in small compositions.

ListeningIn the Listening test, the new TOEFL test is slightly more difficult, requiring the test taker to listen to a 5-7 minute lecture or conversation without looking at the question, after which the test taker needs to recall and take notes to do the question. This requirement is relatively high. The IELTS listening test can be seen in the question, and candidates need to fill in some details or make some options in the test.