What is the difference between the Pentium 4 single core CPU and the Core 2 dual core CPU in terms o

Hello landlord: It is popular to buy Core dual-core now, why?

A: Core performance is high, L2 cache is large, architecture is first.

Which is better in terms of performance, Core dual-core or Pentium 4 single-core?

Answer: You can understand from the literal meaning that a dual-core can outperform a single-core.

There is also the high performance of the Core dual-core, the large L2 cache, and the architecture first.

What's the point of dual cores, is it just two CPUs processing a program at the same time.

Answer: No, the dual-core can only be turned on in terms of games, and a certain amount of energy will generally be hidden, as a buffer area, so that it will not be very stuck

Is it possible to process one program with one core and another with another?

A: Not only dual-core can do, but even a single core can handle multitasking.

Which one runs faster with a Pentium 4 computer and a PC with a Core Duo with the same accessories?

Answer: It must be the Core dual-core fast, satisfied.

Hehe, the dual-core architecture is definitely much better than the Pentium 4.

It's a bit inaccurate to say that the program is divided into processes and threads, and then the two CPUs deal with different threads.

It must be that the Core dual-core is much better, with high efficiency and low heating.

Of course, the Core 2 dual-core CPU is good, a new generation of processor architecture, the undisputed king of performance, and the power consumption is only half of the Pentium 4 single-core CPU.

The reason for this is that technology is advancing. The number of cores is not indicative of performance. At that time, the quad-core was limited by technology, and one core could not achieve a certain performance, but it was found that multi-core could do it, and now that the technology has improved, one core can also achieve the performance of the quad-core of the year.

In fact, you know very well in your own heart that you just have to go through this problem.

The core process and so on have changed too much.

Because the times are advancing, science and technology are developing.

It's dual-core. The difference with the Pentium Dual-Core -- you mean the architecture is a problem, right?

The i3 is the so-called true dual-core -- it's just a little more efficient. It's not much magical.

The meaning of true dual-core is that there are 2 physical cores, in fact, the Pentium and i3 are true dual-core, but the Pentium has some less technology than the i3, like hyper-threading, virtualization, and others are actually similar.

Yes, I won't add that upstairs if it's not clear.

The difference between them is architecture and performance, because Intel's I series is now the most powerful CPU family in the CPU market, Pentium is just an old model, he has no strong masterpieces, but the I series of CPUs, all the cores have optimization and thread technology is excellent, and Pentium used to be the title of the older generation, so Intel will not give up on him.

First of all, the architecture is different, and this is the most important factor that affects the performance of the processor, for example:

The Core frame is like the traffic flow of the highway, and the Pentium frame is like a normal highway.

Second, the front-side bus is different, the front-side bus of core2 supports up to 1066Hz, so that the exchange efficiency with memory can reach the highest, because the memory frequency of notebook DDR3 is also up to 1066Hz, while the front-side bus of Pentium is up to 800Hz

As of the end of 2009, but it seems that the new Pentium P6000 front-side bus has improved this year) Third, cache, this to the CPU

The impact on performance is not very huge, but it still has a great impact on data exchange, generally the level 2 cache of the core series is higher than that of Pentium, the level 2 premature cache of the core2 series T9xx is 6M, and the T4XX2 level cache of the Pentium architecture is up to 2M

So, to sum up the above, core

The performance is much better than that of the Pentium.

Thank you, welcome to ask Tong Chai.

The Pentium is a processor aimed at 65nm.

Core is a processor aimed at 45nm.

Relatively speaking, it must be Core.

45nm not only has an increase in the external frequency.

It also saves power.