Analyze a sentence, analyze the sentence

Select d for translation:

The girl was going to marry a rich man.

Infinitives can be in either active or passive voice.

Your question mainly examines the usage of marry, which can be used actively, or passively in active voice, that is.

i will marry her.I will marry her (I will marry her).

Or passive voice:

she will be married to me.She will marry me (she will marry me).

The active voice is a transitive verb and cannot be followed by any preposition, so the A and C options are both wrong I use the passive voice, and I can only choose D correctly. There is no to in option b, so it is wrong.

No, how is marriage to be knotted, so it shouldn't be d, it should be that I am going to marry a rich man, infinitive, just the table will be done.

Please help analyze the sentence structure and translate it, thank you for your attention! Subject some jobs, subject complement non-factional and stupid structure: Generally speaking, a participle or participle phrase is used as an adverbial, and its logical subject should be consistent with the subject of the sentence

Overall structure. Main sentence: a friend is someone һ һ һ

Restrictive definite clause: who draws out your own best qualities

Non-restrictive dan sparkle definite clause: with whom you sparkle and become more of whatever the friendship draws uponWith him, you will be energized and become the object of mutual friendship in all aspects.

The non-restrictive definite clause nests the prepositional object clause whatever the friendship draws upon, and its structure is ambiguous as ——

Conjunction and prepositional object: Li Seeping whatever (relational pronoun type conjunctive pronoun, equivalent to anything that, here it can be understood as "in which respect...").object).

Subject: the friendship

Predicate verb: draws upon (to get closer, to take advantage of).

Teacher Pan is here to save you A friend is someone who can make you show your best qualities, and the spark with you can become a reference for any friendship.

1 The inverted sentence is used here because of the use of the subjunctive mood, omitting should. In the case of omitting should, the subject-predicate needs to be inverted.

2 This form of subjugation is more common in particularly literary, especially in slightly older English works, such as the Renaissance.

3 The subjunctive mood sentence that reverts to the normal sentence structure should be: if it should be a family business or a multinational company.

my mother'S faith in me rewarded and her secretfear changed into open triumph are independent nominative constructions for adverbials. In other words, "everything changed in an instant, and my future life was revealed", and at the same time, "my mother's faith in me was reciprocated, and her worries turned into public joy."

The constituent chain of independent nominative structures is "logical subject + participle", and the structures of these two imperative phrases are -

The logical subject is my mother's faith in me + past participle rewarded (=in themeantime my mother.)'s faith in me was rewarded).

Logical subject her secret fear + past participle phrase changed into open triumph (= abbreviation of her secret fear was changed into open triumph) in themeantime

The so-called independent nominative structure refers to the fact that a phrase in the form of a non-predicate form has an independent nominative structure that is independent of the subject of the clause as a logical subject, and this non-predicate phrase includes participle phrases, infinitive phrases, adjective phrases, etc.

There is a detailed explanation of the independent nominative structure in the grammar books, so you can take the time to study this part. It can also be consulted on the Internet.

Strictly speaking, the sentence "Shed" is problematic.

The main sentence is: in a moment everything was changed

This is followed by a supplement explaining what has changed the shouting crack, which belongs to the juxtaposition structure, and the predicate verb should be omitted, but the first clause is used.

My Future Took a Definite Shape clearly has took as a verb, and the last two clauses of the chain are passive, omitting was, so the structure is unbalanced.

This sentence is indeed problematic. The original sentence is as follows:

in a moment everything was changed, my future life molded into a definite shape, my mother's faith in me rewarded, and her secret fear changed into open triumph.

in a moment everything was changed is the main clause, and the rest of my future life molded into a definite shape, my mother's faith in me rewarded, and her secret fear changed into open triumph is an independent nominative structure, table result.

Some of the functions of the independent nominative structure: 1 as an adverbial 1) to indicate the time his homework done (=after his homework was done) with burning, mary decided to go shopping2) It means that there is no buses (=because there were no buses), we had to walk home

3) Indicates the condition weather permitting(=if weather permits), we'll go to play basketball

This is not right, rewarded is the past of reward, and this Hui Kuli reward is a predicate, the author of the full text is narrating, it should happen in the past, in the simple past tense, my mothers faith in me rewardedMy mom's faith in me was rewarded. What you said is to mean passive, to make a definite to modify the preceding noun.

This is the award (rewarded by Li). The affirmative of the macro in parentheses modifies the awardWhat you don't understand is that the verb (adjective) passively does the pre-cutaway sentence.

When the main clause has the verb be, the be of the clause can be omitted.