If the Qing Dynasty had opened its doors and implemented a constitutional system, would the Qing Dyn

This is impossible, and the demise will definitely perish, but the time of the demise may be postponed.

It is inevitable that if the Qing Dynasty or the feudal system are not changed, it is useless to implement anything, and in the end it will be overthrown and destroyed by the new ideas.

It is impossible to avoid extinction, because the feudal idea is the most terrifying, and even if it does not perish at that time, there will always be a day when it will be overthrown and the people will be saved.

Of course it is impossible, the feudal system is impossible to have, and what exists in the world will one day be overthrown by the advanced system.

Perdition should be inevitable, after all, it is impossible to stay in a feudal society all the time, and when the time comes, it will naturally not last long.

Of course not, because the Qing Dynasty was a feudal country after all, and the world political situation had progressed, and the existence of cover countries was not allowed.

The Qing Dynasty was sure to perish, because the Qing Dynasty still practiced the feudal system, and at that time it had already made a transition from feudalism to a capitalist country.

It should not be possible to avoid perishion, because the constitutionalism itself is in conflict with the Qing Dynasty's ideology of governance.

First of all, this is a standard false proposition, because the Qing Dynasty will not succeed in constitutional monarchy.

1.Taking the Wuxu Reform as an example, all the reformers are seeking top-down reforms, and Guangxu supports the reform in order to gain more power rather than accept the loss of power; in such intrigues, even if the "post-party" does not act, the reform will end in failure, while the bourgeois revolution in Europe is carried out from the bottom up and completed with blood. However, there are also people who understand the law, and Tan Sitong's words illustrate the crux of this problem:

The law changes in all countries are made from bloodshed, and today China has not heard of anyone who has shed blood because of the law changes, and the reason why this country is not prosperous is also.

Therefore, the Qing Dynasty's refusal to hand over power was an internal cause, and a constitutional monarchy could not be completed from the top down.

2.The Chinese revolution was not a revolution of demands from one class to another, but a rebellion against the Qing Dynasty, and if the Qing Dynasty continued to be enshrined as the monarch, it would be meaningless for the revolution. In addition, in the later period, the Qing Dynasty said that it wanted to establish a constitution several times in order to continue its life, but it was all gone, and there was no credibility at all, so it was okay if such a monarch didn't want it.

Therefore, the revolutionary forces cannot tolerate the existence of a monarch, this is an external factor, and a constitutional monarchy cannot be from the bottom up.

3.In addition, the Qing Dynasty was a minority dynasty that did not represent the vast majority of the Han population, which was one of the reasons why a constitutional monarchy could not take shape in China.

In the late Qing Dynasty, the building was about to collapse, and the constitutional monarchy was just an excuse for existence, not a good medicine for life. China does not have the bourgeoisie peculiar to Western capitalist countries to lead the revolution, and the Xinhai Revolution, in the final analysis, is a bit casual and a bit fatalistic.

The biggest obstacle to a constitutional monarchy has never been the royal family, which will agree to a constitutional monarchy in order to preserve some of its powers and privileges.

But what about the Manchu power class of the entire Qing Dynasty, and can they retain their power after the constitutional monarchy? The final Imperial Cabinet is an example.

And I don't think that the constitutional monarchy can save the Manchu Qing Dynasty, Yuan Shikai in the later period of liquidation is a one-handed cover of the sky, the result is still not able to unify the whole of China, local politics is still in the hands of the locality, the key to the establishment of the Beiyang **, the power should be greater than the constitutional monarchy of the royal family, the result is still a mess, when the Qing ** constitutional monarchy, then that day is the first day of complete loss of power, the royal family and the country name may be retained, but there is no need to participate in government affairs.

If it succeeded, the Qing Dynasty would not have perished, and Yuan Shikai would not have united with the Revolutionary Party, which advocated a constitutional monarchy and opposed a democratic republic.

Then it can at least continue to this day, after all, with a constitutional monarchy, the monarch no longer has any rights.

It will not last for a few years, and revolutionary parties in various places will rise up one after another, and the feudal society will inevitably be subverted, and even if the system is reformed, it will not be able to maintain the rule of the Qing Dynasty.

It will probably continue to this day. Because of the realization of a constitutional monarchy, the Qing Dynasty will complete the transformation, and it will slowly change from weak to strong, and it will not perish.

In order to learn from the West, he changed the law and made China strong, but it failed because it was not suitable for China itself, and the power of the monarch in the constitutional monarchy was too great.

Because there was an urgent need to alleviate the domestic crisis of the Qing Dynasty through a change at that time, the reason why the constitutional monarchy was chosen was because Cixi thought that this system would not bring him too much loss, and the reason for the failure was that the resistance was too great in the later period.

The constitutional monarchy was initiated because the Qing Dynasty was too weak. Facing the risk of being carved up by foreign powers, Kang Youwei and others launched the slogan of learning from Western countries and advocated the implementation of a constitutional monarchy. The reason for the failure was that the feudal stubborn forces were too strong at that time, and the constitutional monarchy would harm the interests of these people, so they suppressed the constitutional monarchy.

No. At that time, if the constitutional monarchy had been implemented, the revolution would not have continued, and they would not have overthrown the Qing Dynasty.

I think the Qing Dynasty will still be overthrown, because the Qing Dynasty at that time did not do these things without being destroyed.

It will still be overthrown, because at that time, the Qing Dynasty was worried about internal and external troubles, and many forces wanted to overthrow the Qing Dynasty.

Yes. Because the Qing Dynasty has long been decayed, even if the implementation of a constitutional monarchy, it cannot be restored.

The constitutional monarchy implemented at the end of the Qing Dynasty was a pseudo-constitution. The royal family occupies the vast majority of seats in the constitution. The essence of the feudal nature of the Qing Dynasty has not changed, and the overthrow of the Qing Dynasty is a historical inevitability.

Even if the "Constitutional Movement" succeeded, the Qing Dynasty would still perish. It's just a matter of time, the core of the movement is to organize the demise of the Qing Dynasty, the feudal system has come to an end, and it is only a matter of time before it will perish.

Even if the Qing Dynasty's constitutional monarchy was successful, it would still perish. Because China's national conditions are different from those of other countries, feudalism will restrict China's development every day. The influx of advanced ideological trends will inevitably provoke war again.

In the end, it will still perish, because the Qing Dynasty at that time has gone and the country is already very empty.

At the end of the Qing Dynasty, ** corruption, see clearly**.

At that time, there were many people of insight who believed that the Qing Dynasty could only maintain its power by changing the law and learning from the constitutional monarchies of Japan and Germany at that time. However, this suggestion was not implemented by the rulers of the Qing Dynasty at that time, and it was not implemented until two years before the fall of the Qing Dynasty, but it was only made to show the effort, so the Xinhai Revolution.

After the Manchu dynasty.

End. So why didn't the stormy Manchu ** implement a constitutional monarchy.

This? Because the Manchu Dynasty's implementation of a constitutional monarchy was hindered by the Empress Dowager Cixi, the Manchu Qing Dynasty was unwilling to give up imperial power, and the revolutionary party saw the face of the Qing Dynasty and no longer expected the Manchu Dynasty to implement a constitutional monarchy. Vertical hand

1. The Manchu Qing Dynasty implemented a constitutional monarchy, which was hindered by the Empress Dowager Cixi.

Manchu ** in Guangxu.

During the years, the law was changed to become strong, but the changes at that time affected the interests of the Empress Dowager Cixi, and the Empress Dowager Cixi decided to return to power, and she won over the general Yuan Shikai at the time.

It led to the Wuxu change in the Guangxu period.

Fail. The Empress Dowager Cixi decreed not to change the ancestral system, and no one mentioned changing the law when the Empress Dowager Cixi was alive. The constitutional monarchy was not realized during the reign of the Empress Dowager Cixi. <>

Second, the Manchu Qing Dynasty did not realize the constitutional monarchy after the death of the Empress Dowager Cixi, for fear that the imperial power would be lost.

After the death of the Empress Dowager Cixi, the regent at that time was the emperor's father, he did not want the imperial power to fall, so there was no constitutional monarchy reform, and later the Southern Revolutionary Party was more rampant, in order to maintain the rule of the Qing Dynasty, he agreed to the constitutional monarchy, but did not expect that the cabinet he reorganized, it turned out to be members of the imperial family, the royal family members at that time did not want the imperial power to fall, and still hoped to be able to control the imperial power. Therefore, the constitutional monarchy of the Manchu Qing Dynasty at that time did not win the support of the people of the whole country. <>

3. The revolutionary party saw clearly the true face of the Manchu Qing Dynasty and carried out the revolution.

Sun Yat-sen in the south at that time.

The revolutionary party led by them had seen the true face of the Qing Dynasty clearly, they did not believe that the actual rulers of the Manchu ** could give up power, they no longer had the luxury of expecting the Manchu ** to carry out reforms, they started the Northern Expedition two years after the Manchu ** carried out the so-called constitutional monarchy, and the Manchu ** died from then on. <>

In the middle and late Qing Dynasty, the opium victory occurred, and foreign ideas and constitutional monarchy slowly spread to the Qing Dynasty, and people in ancient China had more understanding and more open-mindedness about the ideas of the ruling class and social class. After more than 100 years of infiltration of foreign advanced ideas, in 1989 Emperor Guangxu launched the Restoration Movement, he hoped to bring the Qing Dynasty into a constitutional monarchy through this reform, but this movement failed in less than a month, and Emperor Guangxu was imprisoned in Yingtai, Zhongnanhai. In 1906, the Qing Dynasty was forced to accept a constitutional monarchy, but it was too late, and the constitution at that time still protected many interests and privileges of the Manchus.

The main reason is that the ruling class of the Qing Dynasty did not really want a constitutional monarchy, because the Qing Dynasty was built on the basis of the unequal status of the Manchus and Han from beginning to end.

Because of the influence of feudalism. China's feudal system lasted for more than 2,000 years, and the Qing Dynasty was the most serious period of the feudal system, and there was no way to turn it into a constitutional monarchy.

In the final analysis, because the Qing rulers did not want to give up their power at all, the constitutionalists were strongly obstructed by the old aristocracy, and the revolutionary party was unwilling to allow the Qing feudal system to continue to exist, so the constitutional monarchy eventually failed under the intensification of contradictions.

I don't think so, because the trend of history is like this, and the Qing Dynasty will come to an end sooner or later.

No, the Qing ** is deeply corrupt, and even changing the law can't save the situation of destruction.