The Ming Dynasty was a self sufficient feudal society, which was more backward than the British cap

The word self-sufficiency is not used well.

The open sea of the Ming Dynasty was larger than the cargo flow at the end of the Qing Dynasty.

The capital flow of the Dutch East India Company at the same time was only a fraction of that of Zheng Zhilong.

After the opening of the sea ban in the middle and late Ming Dynasty, large-scale maritime activities began.

As we all know, China is not a high-yielding country of silver mines.

But in the last years of the Ming Dynasty, one-third of the world's circulating silver flowed into China.

It can be seen that the amount of ** is huge.

Moreover, the Ming Dynasty successively defeated the Netherlands and Portugal.

It is not lagging behind in science and technology.

More importantly, the budding capitalism of the Ming Dynasty.

and the important political phenomenon of hypocrisy.

It is the system of feudal society that is more backward than that of capitalism, and capitalism has further liberated the productive forces and improved the relations of production compared with feudal society, so it has greater potential for development.

That's a bit of. The Ming Dynasty fell in the mid-17th century.

It was almost the 19th century since the bourgeois revolution was officially completed in England.

Not a period of unification. There is no comparison.

This is a misunderstanding, a nonsense.

The difference between the budding capitalism of the Ming Dynasty and the early Qing Dynasty:

1. The geographical and industry scope is different.

The germ of capitalism in the Ming Dynasty was concentrated in the area south of the Yangtze River. It mainly includes Suzhou and Hangzhou, which are the centers of the silk weaving industry, and Songjiang, the center of the cotton textile industry, while the germination of capitalism in other regions is not obvious.

The germ of capitalism in the early Qing Dynasty was more widely distributed geographically. Including the Pearl River Delta iron manufacturing industry and cotton textile industry, the Yangtze River Delta silk textile industry, Jiangxi Jingdezhen ceramics industry, Fujian, southern Anhui and Zhejiang tea industry, Shanxi and Guizhou brewing industry, Jiangsu salt industry, the transportation industry along the Grand Canal, etc.

2. The capital operation is different.

Industry and commerce in the Ming Dynasty were mostly family-run and simple cooperative. The workshop owners of the textile industry, that is, the "machine owners", use the accumulated funds to set up manual workshops - machine rooms, and hire machine workers to produce (machine workers refer to urban civilians with free labor), that is, "machine owners contribute capital, and machine workers contribute", and they form a relationship between employment and employment.

Industry and commerce in the Qing Dynasty had obvious capital operation and flow. Jin Shang created the ticket number industry, which is equivalent to the prototype of the bank, and a silver ticket can pass the world. Hui merchants and other big merchants invested heavily in handicraft production and became early capitalists.

Silk, porcelain, tea and other bulk export industries have formed several major imperial merchant groups such as Hu Xueyan.

3. The external contact is different.

In the middle and late Ming Dynasty, the sea ban policy has been strictly enforced, and the external ** is strictly controlled under the royal tributary system. On the one hand, the imperial court implemented the national policy of valuing agriculture and suppressing commerce, and on the other hand, it sent eunuchs to act as mine supervisors and tax envoys, and set up checkpoints to collect taxes; It has also established an annual office and procurement system to exploit businessmen. This made the Ming Dynasty's foreign affairs relatively underdeveloped.

The Qing Dynasty's policy of banning the sea was gradually abolished, and the influence of the big merchants was greater. The Thirteen Lines of Guangdong are big businessmen who manage the foreign affairs for the imperial court. In addition, a large number of residents from Guangdong and Fujian went to Nanyang, and overseas Chinese returned to their hometowns to do business after making a fortune there.

The merchant ships of the Portuguese, British and other Western colonizers also came more frequently, which also made the south more prosperous.

This also shows that the germ of capitalism has emerged. In addition to the development of the Qing Dynasty, in terms of scale, output, technology and tools, however, their fate was very different. In Western Europe, the budding capitalism developed rapidly, grew stronger, and became stronger.

The Ming Dynasty was the capitalist germ of the spontaneous handicraft situation, and the Qing Dynasty was the capitalist germ of the industrial situation entered by the forced opening of the country by the foreign powers.

If the Ming Dynasty was the bud of capitalism. Then I believe that poop is food.

The germination of capitalism in the Ming Dynasty was the inevitable development trend of the prosperity of the commercial economy, along with the development of agriculture and handicrafts, the commodity economy in the south of the Yangtze River became unprecedentedly active, but this development was incomplete, first of all, due to the self-sufficient natural economy of our country, the people of the people in China did not have enough purchasing power and desire to buy, and the market urgently needed for the development of capitalism was very narrow; Second, the policy of heavy agriculture and suppression of commerce under feudal rule seriously hindered the further development of the budding capitalism. Again, this budding capitalism was dealt a serious blow in the turmoil of the late Ming and early Qing dynasties.

In the early Qing Dynasty, there was still the development of capitalist sprouts, in the early Qing Dynasty, China implemented an open policy, and the germ of capitalism gradually recovered in the turmoil, with an increasing number of departments and an expanded scale, but soon with the implementation of the Qing Dynasty's policy of closing the country to the sea, coupled with the layers of exploitation and envy, this sprout was almost cut off, and since then there has been no development of capitalism in China.

The emergence and development of the budding capitalism is the inevitable result of the development of the productive forces and the development of the commodity economy, and its emergence shows that new production relations have arisen in China's feudal society, is an important manifestation of the decline of China's feudal society, and is of great significance to the emergence of anti-feudal democratic ideas.

In the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, with the development of agriculture and handicrafts, the commodity economy was unprecedentedly active. In the middle and late Ming Dynasty, in some cities with developed silk weaving industry in the south of the Yangtze River, such as Suzhou, the germ of capitalist production relations occurred; During the Qing Dynasty, there was a slow development, the scope expanded, the number of departments increased, and the scale of the handicraft workshop expanded. But it always lingered in the embryonic state, and the whole production never entered the stage of factory handicrafts, and its strength was far from sufficient to decompose the feudal mode of production, and on a national scale the natural economy still dominated.

The policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing business hindered the development of the budding capitalism in terms of social value, and the rulers repeatedly emphasized that agriculture was the primary industry and commerce was the last industry, and strengthened the consciousness of the end. On the land issue, we should adopt a policy of curbing mergers and acquisitions, prevent a large number of bankruptcies of peasants, and stabilize the foundation of agricultural production; In terms of system, the management of household registration has been strengthened to restrict the movement of population; Restricting merchants and business activities in many ways. In the early stage of feudal society, the emphasis on agriculture and the suppression of commerce were conducive to the stability of the agricultural population to a certain extent and promoted the development of the agricultural economy. It is conducive to ensuring the security of the country, maintaining political stability, and consolidating the position of the monarch. However, the rulers set industry and commerce against agriculture and used political means to suppress the development of industry and commerce, and the result was inevitably to disturb the internal balance of the social and economic structure, hinder the development of the commodity economy and capitalism, and make agricultural production stay at the level of the natural economy for a long time, violating the objective law of economic development.

Looking at the textbooks, it is directly the policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce implemented by the feudal rulers in order to consolidate their own rule, and it is fundamentally the stubbornness of the self-sufficient small-scale peasant economy.

China may be a constitutional monarchy like the United Kingdom, and its comprehensive national power is among the highest in the world. Of course, the possibility of a change in the form of government cannot be ruled out.

At that time, the nobles and magnates evolved into big capitalists, became behind-the-scenes rulers, actively explored the world for their own interests, joined the Age of Discovery, and the West to seize world hegemony, should be able to gain the upper hand, and a first-class power should have it in a few hundred years, our life, look at the current United States.

Thinking about beauty, that emperor eats dry rice.

The change of any dynasty is a historical inevitability, and in the late Ming Dynasty, the country was troubled internally and externally, even if the constitutional monarchy was implemented, it was a drop in the bucket and useless. In the words of Mingyue back then, "the number of qi is exhausted". Irretrievable.

Only changing the system without innovating and developing ideas, the Ming Dynasty should not have a qualitative leap.

The Qing Dynasty and the Ming Dynasty had the same reason, which was to close off the country, suppress the development of their own economy in the direction of capitalism, and be unwilling to give up their economic monopoly position.

Yes 1, the self-sufficient feudal economy is still dominant.

2. The peasants suffered from cruel feudal exploitation, extreme poverty, and could not afford to buy handicrafts from the market 3. Landlords and merchants bought a large number of houses and land with the money they earned, which seriously affected the expansion and reproduction of the handicraft industry 4. The feudal state set up many checkpoints, imposed heavy taxes on commodities and strictly restricted the development of the handicraft industry 5.

In the late Ming Dynasty, there were already signs of capitalism in society, and it would gradually move towards capitalism. The imperial power of the Ming Dynasty became weaker and weaker, and the function of the cabinet became stronger and stronger, so that the government would gradually move towards the path of constitutional monarchy. Western ideas will penetrate (through missionaries) and the commodity economy will become more and more developed.

There is this possibility, because the handicraft industry was quite developed at that time, and the ** of the Ming court at that time had the background of Jiangnan merchants, so if the Ming Dynasty did not fall, the court might be controlled by the bourgeoisie, and from then on, a bourgeois revolution similar to that of Britain would occur, gradually weakening the imperial power and moving towards a constitutional monarchy. But that's just one direction.

The root cause of this is that the decadent feudal system has hindered the growth of the budding capitalism.1 During the feudal period, China had always practiced a policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce, coupled with the extreme poverty of the broad masses of the people and their inability to buy commodities.

2) Due to the feudal self-sufficient production system and the narrow domestic market, the Ming Dynasty was a period when China's foreign policy was open to the outside world and there was no overseas market, so capitalism in that period was always in the embryonic stage.

Development is very difficult!

1. The land economic system of the feudal dynasty determined that it was impossible to let the capital economy dominate.

2. The country is poor, plundering the people, plundering the people, plundering the people, plundering the business, and the business is not guaranteed.

3. Instead of developing the capital economy from the top down, the people from the bottom up develop capital trading in order to survive.

4. The basis of the capital economy is the mass people, but the actual social situation at that time, the general public has food and clothing, and there is no other additional purchasing power at all.

5. Perennial war, internal and external troubles.

6, at that time, the Ming Dynasty was also corrupted to the bones.

1.Policies that emphasize agriculture and suppress business.

2.The policy of "closing the country to the outside world".

3.No capital accumulation was made.

4.Feudal system hindered.