What are the implications of the history and current situation of China UK relations for China s cur

Hello, the words of the system have to be looked at separately:

During the period of feudal society, China developed a feudal society for more than 2,000 years, and its ideology, system, and means of governance had been perfected. The British political system was relatively loose, did not form its own ideological mechanism for survival, and soon after the Renaissance, it received the idea of democracy, and finally after the Glorious Revolution, the bourgeoisie with a constitutional monarchy was established;

In order to save the country and survive, more and more people of insight began to study the political system of the West and learn the advanced political concepts of the West, but there are essential differences

China's feudal power was deeply rooted, and the Wuxu Reform led by Kang Youwei and others pinned their hopes on the Guangxu Emperor, who had no real power, and failure was inevitable, and finally China was completely reduced to a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society; Britain, on the other hand, achieved an empire on which the sun never sets through the primitive accumulation of capital.

If the democratic system was implemented from Qin Shi Huang onwards, as was the case in Greece, then we in China would have developed to the level of today's Britain in the Tang Dynasty.

Early China's seclusion, Britain's industrial revolution,

In modern times, Britain has established a constitutional monarchy, achieved institutional innovation, maintained political stability, and created a good political premise for the development of Britain. It has been borrowed by many countries around the world, but it also retains a large number of feudal remnants. Since the establishment of the People's Republic of China, China has also ensured political stability, especially in the past 30 years of reform and opening up, China's development has been obvious to all, and its national strength has continued to increase.

One point is that it is not the political system that has an impact on the development of history, but the promotion of the historical process that has caused the political system to be inconsistent.

Britain has been a "maritime civilization" since ancient times, that is, a "commercial civilization", and there is no complete and unified country, and the decrees of the British Empress in ancient times basically had no effect except for London. So they don't have a unified ** sovereignty, plus commercial civilization, people pay attention to credibility and equality (the basis of this business), so their political system is what it is now.

The geographical environment of the "mainland civilization" has been relatively closed since ancient times, blocked by the Himalayas in the west, deserts and grasslands in the north, and accompanied by the sea in the south and east. Therefore, it has caused a relative concentration of personnel, and there will be no large-scale migration, which has promoted the development and improvement of feudal centralization.

It's too much to talk about, that's roughly the case, if you don't understand, you ask!

One is to eat with chopsticks made of two pieces of wood.

One is to eat with a fork with four tips.

The first era of Sino-British relations is in line with the respective national interests of China and the UK, and national interests are the decisive factor in international relations. The common interest among countries is the basis of international cooperation.

The era of quiet relations between China and the UK is also conducive to regional and world peace and development. Peace and development are the theme of the times, and the development of the Sino-British relationship can play a leading role in imitating tourism and reflecting the opportunities that China's peaceful development path has brought to the world.