Is man sinful? Are people guilty?

I am a Tibetan, and in our view of Tibetan Buddhism, everyone who comes into this world has their own mission.

Everyone's mission is different. After completing one's mission, the soul will leave the body (also known as death) and go to the six realms of reincarnation to meet its new mission! The saying is that when he completes a hundred missions, he can get out of the sea of suffering and jump into the six reincarnations of birth, old age, sickness and death.

Enter Elysium. What is merit? It is also a merit to live well and complete your mission!

Man is also a creature in this world who knows that he will die, and man suffers and is tired. What is the sin of man?!!

I am who I am, the unique me, and only my faith can judge me! Hope!

Legally speaking, a person is innocent, which is called presumption of innocence.

In life, people may be guilty, isn't it often asked if it is sinful to love someone or whether it is sinful to hate someone, and the answer is often yes.

When a person is born, it causes great pain to his mother, he is guilty, and when a person dies, it brings great pain to his lover or is guilty, it is not up to anyone to decide to avoid it. Of course, sometimes it is a blessing to suffer. So, it's not necessarily right or wrong.

Whether a person is guilty or not, this is not absolute. In other words, what counts as guilty and what counts as innocence, even this is not absolute. As for why humans kill so many creatures, each creature will kill other creatures in order to survive.

You say that killing animals is killing, so is cutting down a tree and eating a vegetable killing? Do you dare to say that plants are not alive?

What is the world of difference, does the law of the jungle know? Only the strong survive.

Human beings are not without natural predators, and if nature wants us to disappear, we can disappear at any time. Mother Earth will not be affected in any way. Heaven has given wisdom to man, but there is nothing but this human being.

Everything that human beings do cannot be said to be right or wrong. Just depends on how you look at it.

As for those creatures that became extinct because of human development, it was because they were too weak and were eliminated. There are so many creatures in the world that disappear forever every day, but their disappearance has nothing to do with us humans. It's just a choice made by the earth's big circulatory system.

That's why I say that species conservationists are actually boring)

In fact, there is a basis for why this is said. You can refer to the age of the dinosaurs. At that time, it was the world of dinosaurs.

Mammals like humans can only adapt to that time through evolution. At that time, mammals were so weak and how strong the dinosaurs were. Did they do something wrong?

They just survive. And then what? Extinct, smashed by a meteorite, so extinct.

And then what? The world of mammals. What about dinosaurs?

I guess I've become a bird. Or like a crocodile. Anyway, they got used to it, and then it was no longer their world.

In order to adapt to the current society, they have evolved. As for those who haven't evolved, they're all gone. Does it have anything to do with us humans?

It's not off. In other words, to put it mildly, those species that could not adapt to the current situation deserved to disappear. No, it should be. Wasn't that the case in the age of the dinosaurs?

After being hit by a meteorite, a bunch of dinosaurs couldn't get used to it, so they hung up. Then the mammals laughed.

From the above examples, one cannot be counted guilty. Of course, we don't know that day, Mother Earth suddenly thought we were in trouble, and then she just made a few ** tsunamis, a few volcanic eruptions, and then let humans bento, or maybe. Of course, who are we to blame?

Then the earth continues to circulate, and there may be another high-IQ life form on the earth in the future. Does that still have anything to do with us?

One last word, it seems that the person who recommended the answer agrees with LZ's sympathy, but I'm sorry that maybe it's a little inappropriate for me to say this here. But I'll say it anyway, sympathy is not necessary, because you sympathize with him just because you are afraid that one day you will be like him. (Just my opinion, of course.)

In short, I think that as long as LZ does not arbitrarily deprive other life forms of the right to continue to live in this world except for their own food or other special needs, I believe that whether that species will be extinct or not is of course only a decision of the Earth Lord

Above, there is a lot of nonsense, personal ignorance, I think it is useless, please ignore it

Animals don't ask if it's right or not, so they never bother when they eat their prey, and maybe think about it when they have enough food.

Right and wrong, guilty and innocent, are all set by human beings, and then only apply to human beings who set them. You can't ask cats not to eat mice, and you can't convict cats for that, it's not scientific. Man is at the top of the food chain, so he eats other animals.

If, I mean, by chance, an animal climbs on top of you in the food chain, for example, you meet a hungry wolf in the desert, then it will certainly not be kind to you.

You think about this question to show your interest in philosophy and ethics, you can continue to understand, but don't let it affect your life, I wish you happiness!

Many people have died in the history of human development, and if we use the number of deaths, countless species have been extinct far away. The glory of mankind today is forged by the blood of its own kind. Grieve for our fellow human ...

Isn't it touching that the leopard didn't eat the little star? That's because it's full after eating the gorilla, and one day when it's hungry, it'll eat that little star.

Besides, can we live without eating meat? Can you? Vegetarian nutrition alone can't keep up.

Do you ask, is there a way not to eat meat? There will be later, and you can skip meat in the future. But now I don't, I can only eat meat.

In other words, we are eating meat and thinking about how not to eat meat. Is it ridiculous? Not ridiculous at all.

The development of living things is based on a full stomach. Is that right? Your stomach is full when you're discussing whether people are guilty or not, and if you're hungry, you don't ask the question.

There is no absolute in the world, and as for whether human beings are guilty or not, the perspective is different and the meaning is different. On the other hand, there is a great sin. Eating meat, full stomachs, ** Humans who eat meat are not guilty!!

What can you do if you are guilty, the landlord still eats meat, doesn't he? To live is to be a contradiction, to have wisdom is to be sad, and to think about it, in fact, human beings are ,,, the most pathetic animals on earth.

Human beings are also a member of the descendants of the omnipotent universe, and our existence and continuation must also follow and obey the unified rules of the universe, the emergence of human beings and their continuous deepening, understanding and mastery of the truth, and because of the needs of their own survival and development, human beings have changed and destroyed the natural world to the point of shock, and also as the supreme ruler of nature and complacent, condescending, but the vast majority of human beings are still unaware of this, which is the greatest sorrow of human beings at present, Let it continue, the result will be self-evident, there is no need to elaborate, the truth is in the hands of a very small number of people, I believe that it will not be long before the truth is finally analyzed, and human beings will finally understand and reflect on ......Use practical actions to better meet and create your own bright future!

This is not something that anyone can decide or change, this is the law of survival of nature, and it is also the objective law of nature. It is an indisputable fact that humans are at the top of the biological chain. Darwin's natural selection, the survival of the fittest, shows that human beings are the survival overlords of nature, and no living thing can compete with human beings.

Humans cannot survive if they do not eat other animals. Therefore, nature is cruel, society is cruel, and reality is cruel. In order for humans to survive, they must harm other living beings.

I don't think it's guilty, it's helpless.

With desires, human beings will fulfill these desires, but these desires often imply the existence of victims. However, people are still social, they are always reflecting on themselves, finding more reasonable solutions, more in line with the laws of nature and society, and trying not to violate the laws. This is what the ancients said"Heavenly Dao".

If there is no one in the financial room, it is certain that there is no robbery. Secondly, Zhang Shan does not necessarily constitute a crime, because there are still many circumstances that we do not know now. After intervening, it is possible to understand the truth inside.

Judging from your supplementary information, Zhang Shan constituted the crime of robbery, and although he participated in the premeditation, it is still controversial whether he was the principal offender. Generally, most of the premeditated offenders are the principal offenders, and the principal offenders are heavier. Judging from the distribution of spoils, Zhang Shan is not the main culprit. It is recommended to have it locally, focusing on the distribution of spoils to facilitate lightening.

The absence of injury does not affect the conviction.

From the angle of Zhang Shan's money, he may have provided some internal information to the perpetrators, otherwise those people would not have given him money. In this case, if someone else said to steal it at the time, then it could only bear the sting of stealing, and if it was said that when you went, you knew that someone inside was going to rob it, then you would have to bear the responsibility of robbing.

It will not be dealt with as the main culprit. This can be seen from the fact that the money is only a few hundred dollars.

First of all, whether it is a robbery depends on whether there is anyone in the financial room at that time, if there is no one, it is just theft, and all the people involved in the case do not constitute the crime of robbery, and Zhang Shan is too.

Second, Zhang Shan should have been an accomplice to the crime of robbery and theft. Because: 1. The offense was not mentioned by Zhang Shan; 2. Zhang Shan only provided assistance to other criminal suspects in achieving their criminal goals, and is an aider; 3. Judging from the distribution of spoils, Zhang Shan only got it.

Six or seven hundred yuan, accounting for a very small proportion of the stolen money.

Construct a defense to protect Zhang Shan's rights and interests to the greatest extent.

Suspected robbery involvement.

Judging from the information you added again, (, 14,54 points) Zhang Shan only constituted the crime of theft in the joint crime, and was an accomplice, and the others constituted the crime of robbery. In addition, I never said that Zhang Shan was the principal offender, but that he was an accomplice. In your exact words, you are saying that the main culprit is so serious.

So, you were careless and you misunderstood the point of view, but it doesn't matter. I put forward the concept of the principal offender to remind the family to pay attention to it, because there is a premeditated plan in it, and it is easy to cause the principal offender in the future trial, which is the advice I have given to you based on the experience of a criminal judge who has been a criminal judge for 10 years. Therefore, there are two details in this case, one is that everyone else is guilty of robbery, and he is theft; One is to exclude the principal offender.

Therefore, it is not only necessary to invite experienced criminals, but also to invite meticulous and serious styles, and also to be able to concentrate relatively on and time to handle the case at a stage. Therefore, if there is one in the local area, the lawyer's fee cannot be less. It should be said that the results below 4 years are successful.

Man also sins, and man was born to suffer. Buddhism says, "Break off the three emotions and six desires."

We spend all day being in the glamour, bird's nest and dog meat, doing things that we don't know right or wrong, thinking about things that we don't know what to do. All day long, the third and second mothers are full of desire, and the star rookie ** spreads rumors...

People are not wrong, the world is unpredictable. All living things are selfish, and there is no right or wrong for this phenomenon. Does tiger poison not eat children? How can people give up their children, not to be happy with things, not to feel sorry for themselves. Treat it normally, and be an ordinary person is not necessarily ordinary.

It's not human fault, it's the law of nature, human beings can't leave poultry and other meat, but we have to understand that we have to treat them with a grateful and benevolent heart, whether it's animals or plants, they have made sacrifices for us humans, I don't think it's wrong to eat meat, but please hurt them maliciously for no other reason

What a kind person to ask such a question! I've been thinking about it all the time. Here's an example:

If this happens naturally, even if it is murder of chickens and pigs, etc., it is not guilty, and sin is defined by man. It's just that in the cruel real world, there is always a little warmth and kindness. It may be stupid to develop this only remaining thing, but it is a world of beautiful hearts.

The rain on the top of the dangerous peak is diverted along the slope of the mountain, and those who regard the difference between the ten thousand laws also follow the ten thousand laws.

In this life and this life, be conscientious, so that you can have no regrets for a hundred years. Just because, in addition to this, the karma caused by blind activity causes the mind to be tormented by illusions.

3.The worldly world is overshadowed by the illusion of ignorance, and if the false is true, the mind will kill itself. In a dark world, the ignorant will inevitably throw themselves into it.

Those who indulge in the great worlds will enter into the darkness of ignorance, and will be attached to complete liberation, and will fall into greater darkness.

All sentient beings are suffering and happy, the Buddha said that all kinds of karma are born, and all kinds of karma are also created, and all kinds of sentient beings are created and wandered in samsara, and the karmic network is very large. ”

There are some people who now have power and status and have many benefits, but when the time of death comes, they will not be able to follow any of them, and only the good and evil karma that they have accumulated in this life will follow them, and they will be introduced into the good and evil pleasures of samsara.