Why is it said that use value and value are mutually exclusive and incompatible?

Personal opinion. First of all, value is universal, just like weight.

However, value is meaningless until exchange comes along.

Suppose we stipulate that the exchange is based on weight, that is, one pound of flour for one pound of iron. If we don't exchange with each other, the flour still weighs a pound, but what's the point??? You just have to eat it, and you care how much it weighs and what you do (don't think about whether you have enough to eat, of course).

This means that if you eat the flour - you take possession of its use value - it means that you do not participate in the exchange - then the weight has no meaning to you at the level of exchange - therefore, we say that you have no value in the flour.

This is a systematic concept, a person cannot have the use value and value of a commodity at the same time, when money appears, its external form is manifested as the contradiction between commodity and money.

Explanation:1The use value is expressed in the form of the usefulness of the commodity (mineral water, drunk, buns, food, house, live).

2.The expression of value is the exchange value of commodities (mineral springs 2 yuan, buns 3 yuan, house 1 million), here we should pay attention to the exchange value Currency has experienced physical money, credit money, paper money, to today's electronic money, the exchange value is not necessarily paper money.

Example. You can drink mineral water (use value) and you have to pay two yuan (the exchange value is approximately equal to the "value").

The merchant was given two yuan, but could no longer own the bottle of mineral water.

Once again, one cannot have both the use value and the value of a commodity, and when money appears, its external form manifests itself as a contradiction between the commodity and money.

Actually, I don't understand either. A pencil of a few cents can draw millions of pictures, both the use of pencils and the use of wealth can be created.

On the one hand, the use value and value of commodities are unified, and they do not become commodities without one, and the existence of value must be premised on the existence of use value.

On the other hand, use value and value are different and contradictory, use value as a natural attribute of commodities reflects the relationship between man and nature, value as a social attribute of commodities reflects the social relations between commodity producers, and use value is an attribute common to all useful items, including commodities, and is an eternal category.

In order to obtain the value of a commodity, the use value of the commodity must be transferred, and the value of the commodity must be surrendered when the use value of the commodity is obtained. For example, if you want to ** a commodity and get its value, but you have to transfer the use value of the commodity to the buyer, in the same way, you want to buy the commodity and get its use value, but you have to pay the value of the commodity to get the commodity.

Therefore, the use value of the commodity and the value of the commodity cannot be combined.

It's very simple, for example, if you drive a car, you have a use value, but no one gives you money, only if you sell it, you have money (value), but you lose its use value, you remember that the value of the item is reflected through exchange.

In this way, when the laborer remanufactures the commodity, he creates the use value of the commodity in concrete labor, and creates the value of the commodity in the conceptual labor, and the use value and the value are opposites and unified, and you cannot have both, and you, as the purchaser, aim to obtain the use value, and you must take out the money, which is the value of the commodity, to buy it, and you as the seller, the use value of the commodity is not as practical in your eyes as the value of the commodity.

The landlord wants to buy things and take people and goods without giving people money, or wants to sell things and get people money without giving people goods.

Original disturbance: In order to obtain the value of the commodity, the use value of the commodity must be transferred, and the value of the commodity must be transferred when the use value of the commodity is obtained. For example, if you want to buy a commodity and obtain its value, you must transfer the use value of the commodity to the purchaser, and similarly, if you want to buy a commodity and want to obtain its depressive use value, you must pay the value of the commodity in order to get the commodity.

Therefore, the use value of the commodity and the value of the commodity cannot be combined.

<> use value. The reason why the value of the commodity is incompatible is that in order to obtain the value of the commodity, the use price of the commodity must be transferred, and if the use value of the commodity is to be obtained, the value of the socks Sakura needs to be transferred. For example, if you want to ** a commodity and obtain its value, you must transfer the use value of the commodity to the buyer, so it is good to beam, the use value of the commodity and the value of the commodity.

It's not a both.

The value of commodities and the use value of each other are mutually exclusive, and the two cannot be both.

a.It's a good match.

b.Mistaken Wheel Tomb.

Correct Answer: a

Reason: In order to obtain the value of the commodity, the use value of the commodity must be transferred, and the value of the commodity must be surrendered when the use value of the commodity is obtained. For example, if you want to buy a commodity and obtain its value, you must transfer the use value of the commodity to the buyer, and similarly, if you want to buy a commodity and want to obtain its use value, you must pay the value of the commodity in order to get the commodity.

Therefore, the use value of the commodity and the value of the commodity cannot be combined.

Because there is no value in the goods. and the value of its use are different.

Summary. No use value means that an item or resource cannot be used or used under existing conditions, such as a water source in a desert that has no use value for people who lack technology and equipment. Non-use value means that an object or resource itself cannot be used or utilized, such as priceless antique artifacts have no use value.

Therefore, the difference between the two is that the value of the former is determined by external conditions, while <>the value of the latter is determined by the properties of the item or resource itself

No use value means that an item or resource cannot be used or used under existing conditions, such as a water source that is late in the desert and has no use value for people who lack technology and equipment. Non-use value means that an item or resource itself cannot be used or utilized, such as priceless wild plum antique cultural relics have no use value. Therefore, the difference between the two is that the value of the former is determined by external conditions, while <>the value of the latter is determined by the properties of the item or resource itself

Is it illegal to use drugs?

Although the illegal Yejin drug may have a certain medical effect, it may have problems in terms of safety and quality because it has not gone through the procedures stipulated in the law of Fa Song Tongji, and it is illegal to use it legally because it does not meet the regulatory standards and cannot be used legally. Therefore, although illegal drugs have a certain use value, they can no longer be sold and used in the legal market due to their illegal identity and illegal **.

Commodities are the unity of use value and value. In the two factors of commodities, there is a relationship of opposition and unity between use value and value. Its unity is manifested in the interdependence and mutual conditions of the two, without which they cannot become commodities.

The existence of value is premised on the existence of use value. What has no use value cannot be exchanged, and therefore will not have value; Use value is the material carrier of value, and value is contained in use value.

The contradiction between the use value and the value of commodities is manifested in the following aspects: first, the two reflect different relationships. As a natural attribute of commodities, use value reflects the relationship between man and nature, and is an eternal category. Value, as a social attribute of commodities, reflects the relationship between commodity producers and is a unique category of commodity economy.

Second, they are mutually exclusive. For the producer of commodities, he can only obtain value by transferring the use value of commodities to the purchasers of commodities. It is impossible for anyone to possess both the use value of a commodity and the value of a commodity at the same time.

Only by selling commodities through exchange can commodity producers realize the value of commodities and consumers obtain use value, so that the inherent contradictions of commodities can be resolved.

The use value of a commodity: The use value is the attribute that a commodity can meet a certain need of people.

The value of a commodity: Value is the undifferentiated human labor condensed in a commodity.

In fact, the example of the newspaper you mentioned, when you read the newspaper, you have paid the necessary labor time, and in the process of reading, you have recreated new value, but you have kept it yourself and did not take it out for exchange, you have possessed the use value yourself, and you have not obtained value as a commodity to circulate, and you have completely transferred the original use value by selling the newspaper to others.

The use value of the newspaper is not only the text on it, but also the carrier of the text - paper, when you ** newspaper, you will lose the use value of the newspaper.