What is there in the universe? Why create animals with living minds?

Occurs by chance, for no reason.

Some people ask that we are the only living species in the universe, and that the top ten signs of life outside the earth are that scientists speculate that there may be life on Venus, because Venus is the most similar planet to the earth, and it is very likely that there are other species with life on it.

Life on the Venus Cloud Scientists speculate that there may be life on the Venus Cloud. Although the surface of Venus is hot and acidic, it is 50 kilometers above the humid atmosphere, the temperature is 70 °C, the pressure is similar to that of the Earth, and the living conditions are more suitable.

Is there or how many celestial bodies like Earth are there in the universe. The organic molecules on Earth do not fly from outside the sky, but they are possessed by themselves, and substances such as water and oxygen, which are necessary for the existence of life, are also abundant in the embryo of the Earth. What is important, then, is the external conditions that cause the evolution of these organic matter, that is, the light and heat conditions from the sun, which are the external conditions that enable the evolution of the earth's organic matter into living matter.

In other words, because the earth has the two conditions of organic matter and solar light and heat, it also has the necessary conditions for the existence of life. In this way, we just need to explore whether there are planets and star systems in the universe like the Earth-Sun. According to research, there are about 1% of stars of the same type as the Sun in the Milky Way, and at least 10% of them have planets, that is, 100 million stars like the Sun have planets.

So among these 100 million planets, are there any planets that are completely consistent with the internal and external conditions of the Earth? In fact, there are countless galaxies like the Milky Way in the entire universe. According to the theory of probability, we can think that there must be celestial bodies in the universe that are the same or similar to the earth in addition to the earth, that is, there must be living planets like the earth in the universe, but we have not discovered each other.

What, then, is the best way to connect with each other in the vast universe and to repent of repentance? In terms of human wisdom and scientific and technological level, the best means is electromagnetic wave communication. Radio telescopes currently in use can receive very faint signals from space, but unfortunately, there is no indication that these signals carry information from advanced intelligent beings.

Another way is to compile symbols that represent the characteristics of the earth into "passwords" to make "earth business cards" and use electromagnetic waves to emit them into outer space. If aliens are about as intelligent as humans, they have the opportunity to receive and decipher the content of our signals, and then they send them to Earth. But even electromagnetic waves emitted by the nearest star of exactly the same type as the Sun would reach the Earth.

Light-year. Suppose this star has planets, and there are highly intelligent life on the planets, and they receive signals and feedback information, and a round trip is enough.

Light-year. Therefore, it is almost impossible for humans to meet them.

Is there only one life in the universe that exists on Earth? The characteristics of living matter on earth are organic matter with hydrocarbons as the main body, oxygen as the exchange material for metabolism, and water as the basic substance for the formation of life. After these conditions are met, at the right temperature, organisms can be formed.

If life could be formed from other substances, it would certainly not be in environmental conditions like Earth. But as long as they are living beings, they must also exchange matter and energy to maintain life activities.

All in all, from the perspective of Libi's theory, earthlings are not lonely, and there may be "aliens" in the universe. But in practice, so far, no life on other planets has been discovered, let alone "aliens" visiting Earth.

The universe is too big, so far human beings have not discovered aliens, but the earth is only one of the hundreds of billions or even infinite planets in the universe, and it is difficult to deny that there are no other creatures.

No, the universe is so big, there must be other intelligent beings. Humans are still searching for extraterrestrial creatures, and they will find them one day.

I don't think humans are the only creatures in the universe, because the universe is very profound, and there must be other creatures in it.

No, there are various types of animals, plants, microorganisms, etc. in the universe, and humans are just the most advanced creatures in the universe.

There was really nothing before the universe was born. This "nothing" is the result of humanity's current measurement in terms of the traditional way of being of matter (time and space). People haven't "seen" or don't know what other ways of being are, but people don't deny that matter has other ways of being.

For there is no law of principle that does not allow matter to exist in any other way.

Since the universe was born, there must be "things" before they can be born. Then this "thing" that does not exist in the form of time and space may be "nothing", because "nothing" means that there is no time and space. So "nothing" is not beyond the human capacity to think (don't you see now that we think?). It's just beyond the traditional spatiotemporal mode of thinking (i.e., perception and change), and it's no wonder, because our thinking consciousness is generated by the brain that exists in a spatiotemporal way.

But we can understand at least one way of being that "nothing": for example, our mental consciousness itself is a kind of existence that is different from the ordinary material way of being. It is not a "substance", it does not exist in a temporal and spatial way, very much in the context of "nothing", but we all know that "it" exists, and in a broad sense, it is also a substance.

The birth of the universe can be understood in this way: the appearance of matter in time and space is the birth of the universe. Matter existed in other ways "before", so it is not so much that matter was born in the universe as that time and space were born in the universe.

Time and space, as a mode of existence of matter, cannot exist separately from matter and its motion, whereas matter can exist independently of time and space. Objective Existence Materiality is the origin of the world, so matter is eternal, but the universe is not eternal, it also has a process of generation, development and destruction. Whether there is a universe or not, objectively real matter exists, but it is by no means as some respondents say

Before the birth of the universe, there was a large amount of matter in time, space, and the whole universe, such as the Milky Way.

No, these things were born with the universe, and "before" this, matter existed in another way, and there was no "mass of time and space matter in the traditional sense", so don't think about things with conventional thinking. Such a large universe can be transformed from "things" in another way of being, and this "thing" is the most essential thing in the universe.

Yes. If you want to understand something, you have to stand in its perspective, and human beings are not yet able to think from the perspective of the universe, and they have little understanding of the past and present lives of the universe, and this kind of nothingness has long exceeded the ability of human beings to think.

It's definitely out of scope, human beings themselves are on earth. A very small part. But the universe contains many galaxies, and each galaxy contains many planets.

It's not that there is nothing, it's just that humans haven't discovered it yet, after all, the stars are too far apart.

Yes. Because human beings are born in the material world, and everything they come into contact with is tangible matter, this kind of nothingness is beyond the ability of human beings to think.

"Earth is a village, and we are all passers-by. We hurried to wash the dirt off our bodies. ”

Reproduction is material, and the difference between human beings and animals lies in the fact that human beings have a rich spirit, and the purpose of reproduction is to pass on the spirit and hope, so that human beings can finally find the meaning of existence.

Human beings are beings who seek meaning and live by meaning, which is the most fundamental aspect of human beings.

Plato said: Meaning is the eternal archetype.

For humanity to live a life of lasting peace, abundance, health, and happiness. We are here to achieve this goal, and it is true that it cannot be accomplished in one or several generations, and Bill Geerts said it well: life is like a fire, and people just want to save something from this fire.

What we have to do and what we can only do is to base ourselves on our own work, work diligently, and make our own modest contribution to the development of society.

In fact, the hypothesis that the universe is a huge organism has been put forward by scientists for a long time, just like our human body, we have blood vessels, blood, cells, and nuclei, but the nucleus has its own life trajectory, but it does not know the existence of the human body. In the same way, the earth, galaxy clusters, the Milky Way, and the solar system all have their own separate systems, but they do not represent the universe and cannot see the universe as a whole. So it's really possible that the universe is a huge organism, and we are just a part of one of its organs.

No. Because the universe is made up of many planets and has no characteristics of life, there is no scientific basis for the idea that the universe is a huge organism.

At present, there is not much scientific evidence to prove that the universe is a huge living organism! I think this is just a human guess about the origin of the universe!

Could the universe we live in be a huge life form? If we calculate according to this statement, in the same proportion, then the solar system we live in is a very small cell in the universe, the sun is the nucleus, and the eight planets are the various substances that make up the cell.

From the evolution of life and the cosmic information that humans can currently explore, human beings are currently the only cosmic civilization creatures, and human beings have also evolved from single-celled organisms to primates, through hundreds of millions of years of evolution.

From the perspective of the evolution of life, there will definitely be other planets in the universe that can evolve intelligent beings, and human beings are not the only civilization, and human beings are not special.

No, human beings also evolved from a single cell, it is a very simple cell, there are many such cells in the universe, so human beings are not the only creatures in the universe.