Did scientists like Newton and Einstein really believe in theology in their later years?

Yes. Because scientists such as Newton and Einstein invented a lot of things and used their brains excessively, they believed in theology in their later years.

There is a saying that "the end of science is theology", and scientists such as Newton and Einstein did deviate from the path of scientific truth in their later years, but they did not fully believe in theism.

Science and superstition are opposites, so why did Newton and Einstein study theology in their later years?

Because they discovered the knowledge of gravity, relativity, and so on, but the precision behind them could not be explained, they began to suspect that God created them, and studied them deeply.

After exhausting the objective laws of the physical world, they finally discovered that the ultimate answer to the question of the universe can only point to God.

Newton's three laws describe the laws of development and change in the universe and their causes. It can be said that Newton's explanation of the "moving" world is clear and clear, but it is impossible to explain how the universe "moves". Why do all things in the world, the sun, moon and stars move according to certain laws, and where does this "first blow" come from?

Reasoning along these lines, Newton eventually attributed this "first blow" to God. Newton went from being a scientist to a theologian.

In this way, Newton commented on his scientific achievements, but he was "following the mind of God" and "thinking according to the mind of God". He summed up his view of all things in the universe and said: "There must be an all-powerful God in charge and rule over all things in the universe.

At the end of the telescope, I saw the trail of God. ”

The scientist Einstein admired the most was Newton. He once modestly stated: "The truly great scientist is Newton, and I have only corrected Newton's errors in calculations."

Einstein, like Newton, also believed that the laws of the universe are the work of "God", the force of "God" in arranging the operation of the planet. One day, a journalist interviewed Albert Einstein and asked him to share his views on the existence of religion and God. It just so happened that Albert Einstein had just sent off a guest.

Albert Einstein asked, "Mr. Reporter, do you know who put the coffee cup and the like here?" The reporter replied

Naturally, it is Your Excellency. Albert Einstein went on to say, "Something as small as a coffee cup still needs a kind of power to arrange; Then if you think about how many planets there are in the universe, and each planet moves in a certain orbit, it is God who moves the power in this arrangement.

Einstein's view of "God" is thought-provoking. In an interview, Albert Einstein said, "Some people think that religion is not scientific.

I am a person who studies science, and I know very well that today's science can only prove the existence of an object, not the non-existence of an object. Therefore, if we cannot prove the existence of an object at this time, we cannot conclude that it does not exist. ”

Einstein further cited the example of the discovery of the "nucleus": "For example, a few years ago, we failed to prove the existence of atomic nuclei, and if we hastily concluded that atomic nuclei did not exist at that time, would we not have made a great mistake today?" At the end of the interview, Albert Einstein said that he believed in the existence of "God":

Therefore, the reason why science today does not prove the existence of God is because science has not yet developed to that extent, not because God does not exist. All in all, the five senses of human beings are limited, and they cannot sense the existence of God, and science cannot deny the existence of God. Therefore, we should be convinced of God's existence. ”

In fact, this is not the case, although we are now developing very rapidly in science, in fact, there are still many mysteries that have not been solved. Some mysteries can't even be explained by science at all. Hundreds of years ago, although these two great men opened up the field of scientific development, but they themselves also have a very big confusion, our current scientists, there are still many people who believe in theology, and these two scientists can be said that there is no one before and after them, there is no one in front of them who can show them the way, they are the leaders of the whole era, so they are more confused, and in the face of many problems may not be explained at all, they have to think that this is something created by God, which is also a kind of spiritual sustenance for themReligious beliefs can indeed explain a lot of things.

I think that religious belief and scientific theory are not contradictory things, religious belief is a kind of baptism of the spirit, and scientific theory is actually a kind of progress for the real society, the two will not hurt each other, nor will they contradict each other, although these two great men in their later years, pinned their spirits on religious beliefs, this is not that he thinks that scientific research is wrong, but they want to release their spirits in this regard in their later years, because their energy is limited in their later years. It may not be possible to create more scientific theories, but they want to turn these scientific theories into theology to see if there are any new developments, which is also a kind of creation.

The main reason is that after the objective physical laws have been studied to a certain extent, it is very difficult to explain the reasons for their occurrence, because they will constantly ask why this is, so they look for spiritual sustenance!

At the end of science is theology, or philosophy.

Theology originates from the exploration of the unknown, and when it reaches a certain level, science can no longer satisfy those great men, because science is repeatable and verifiable, while the exploration of the origin of all things, the birth and death of the universe, science cannot do it, there is no comparison, no experiment, and it cannot be repeated, and science must be built on the basis of actual matter.

**The origin of life is not within the scope of science, such as the question of "chicken or egg".

The ultimate question of mankind is "From the **?" To ** go? Why live? ”

Newton studied theology, and at that time, he was baptized or something since he was a child, which had some influence, and it was too much to say that he believed in theology, and it had something to do with our customs and Taoism and Buddhism, and it could not be said that we were all believers. Albert Einstein was even less theological. So your question itself is not valid.

Newton and Einstein believed that theology was motivated by their own interests and religious beliefs. There are many religiously affiliated scientists who also strive for science. Moreover, the countries and ruling strata of these two people are also mainly religious.

If they didn't believe in theology, it would have seemed unusual at the time, especially in Newton's day.

Mainly because these great scientists later found that many of the scientific theories they knew could not be explained by science and believed in theology.

Don't be misled by some self-leading articles, the theology that Newton Einstein and others believed was very different from what many people usually understood. To put it simply, what scientists mean by theology means that with the deepening of scientific research, it will be found that many laws are very ingenious and perfect, making it difficult for people to believe that they are naturally formed, as if there is a God like a creator in control. And the so-called theology of ordinary people has too much superstitious overtones.

There are similarities between the two, but there are obvious differences.

Newton and Einstein, the greatest physicists, began to believe in higher education in their later years, because no matter how smart and wise he was, but he was also afraid of death, so he began to believe in theology when he was old.

Newton was always a devout believer, so there was no such thing as believing in this for thousands of years. In his later years, he only felt that he had studied physics thoroughly, so he would concentrate on the study of theology;

Throughout his life, Einstein professed to believe in "pantheism", which was completely different from monotheism, so there was no so-called theology that he believed in in his later years.

Perhaps because they have studied too deeply, they feel that there is no way to explore the world, and instead they believe in world theology.

Because these great scientists, in the process of research, gradually discovered that their power was very small, so in the end they often attributed these mysterious powers to theology.

Because I encountered a lot of things that I couldn't solve, I pushed them to God, so that my life would be perfect.

Because the greater the scientists, the more they will discover many mysteries when they are scientific. They will think that God created these things.

Why Newton Einstein was a great physicist and believed in theology for thousands of years, I think it was just that he encountered a lot of difficult mysteries on the road of science, so he finally chose theology.

Generally speaking, the greatest scientists, who in your later years believed in theology, there is a saying that the end of science is theology.

Why did Newton Einstein believe in theology? There is no contradiction between science and theology, and science and technology to be studied and developed are called theology.

Newton because of Einstein, the great physicist, and then this situation appeared, I think this matter should be taken seriously, after all, science is really worth satisfying, believing.

In his later years, his intelligence deteriorated and he forgot about the results of his previous research.

Why did great physicists like Newton and Stan believe in theology in their later years? Maybe people will believe this when they reach a certain age.

Why some of the great figures of Albert Einstein, the physicists who believed in theology in their later years, I think they may think that they were roommates of theological students.

Albert Einstein said that what is known to mankind is a finite circle, and what is unknown is the world outside the circle, which is infinite. Some people think that religion is not scientific. I am a person who studies science, and I know very well that today's science can only prove the existence of certain objects, but not the non-existence of certain objects.

The great scientist Isaac Newton once hosted a stubborn atheist and invited him to see a homemade solar system star orbiter, and the guests were amazed at its precision. Nature asked, "Who made it and how?"

Newton humorously said, "Spontaneously and randomly." The atheist thought this was impossible, and Newton asked rhetorically

If you think that it is impossible for a small star to arise spontaneously, randomly, and accidentally, why do you insist that this vast universe and everything that arises randomly and accidentally?

Newton said: Where there is no matter, what is there? Where does the gravitational pull of the sun and planets come from?

Why is everything in the universe in order? What is the role of planets? Are animal eyes designed according to optical principles?

Isn't there a Creator in the universe?

Although science does not immediately make us understand the origin of all things, it leads us to the God of all. This perfect system of the sun, the planets, and the comets is ...... only by the hand of God AlmightyJust as a blind man has no idea about color, we are ignorant of God's way of understanding everything.

Newton completed all of his discoveries in physics before the age of 26, laying the foundation for science for the next 200 years. Newton compared the universe to a mechanical clock, the hands are driven by the rotation of the gears, and the gears are driven by the clockwork, then the power of the clockwork ** is the first driving force in the most primitive state of the universe, the power of the clockwork comes from people, then the first driving force of the universe can only be God, except for God, Newton could not think of a reasonable explanation. In his later years, Newton devoted himself to the study of theology in order to prove the existence of God.

Such a genius man studied theology for most of his life, and we have reason to believe that he must have discovered something in theology. Newton is said to have left behind a 1.5 million word theological manuscript, which was not published because it did not correspond to the mainstream of the time. Whether the manuscript survives is unknown, but he devoted most of his life to theological research, believing that it must have existed.

There has been a more controversial saying in the scientific community that "the end of science is theology", which implies that everything in the world is arranged, and if science develops to a certain extent, this secret will be discovered, although this sentence seems ridiculous, but it resonates with many people, after all, there are too many puzzling things in this world, and some things can't even be explained by science, such as ghosts and gods, as long as they are mentioned, they are considered superstition and unscientific, But science cannot provide direct evidence that they do not exist.

Because the more I research, the more I feel that science can't solve the problem.

Look down on everything possible, and seek something else.

Maybe this kind of thing has something to do with science.

Because when they find that the theoretical knowledge is no longer explainable, they think about the order of what they are studying.

Because they think this kind of thing exists.

What is known to humans is a finite circle, and what is unknown is the world outside the circle.

What is known to human beings is a finite circle, and what is unknown is the world outside the circle, which is infinite.

This is because the end of science is theology.

The philosophy of space-time in the universe.

Many people wonder why science ends up in theology. The two most commonly mentioned are Newton and Einstein. In fact, it is not difficult to understand that when one doctrine cannot explain another doctrine, and it falls into an infinite cycle and contradiction, there will be another doctrine to comfort this contradiction.

The most straightforward doctrine of this is "theology." ”

Mathematical logic has no end in the real world, there is 1 there is 2, there are children and there are children, there is a dimensional space, there is a two-dimensional space. But when you dare to increase the dimension of space to 5 dimensions, the 6 dimensions of thinking appear. What is the largest number?

Who was the first person to be a mother? What is the maximum number of dimensions that the world can be divided into? Does a collection of everything exist?

As you can see, these simple questions are not easy to answer. The universe is a vast interconnected non-linear fluctuating space-time, and in order to explain it, you have to have a rich imagination that is not enough. What's more, a lot of knowledge is still mediocre.

Take dimensions as an example, each of us knows that we live in four-dimensional space-time, and in the process of exploring the harmony between gravity and quantum mechanics, string theory has emerged, and the highest dimension is currently pushed to 11 dimensions.

That's what I said above, some of the knowledge is something that we set up for ourselves, and when you think about these things, you can deeply understand what I said above.

What is the definition of a dimension? There is no definition of real physics! Do you think about it, how do you define it? It's also embarrassing to think about the previous day.

If you think about it this way, what am I going to describe in terms of dimensions? to describe the universe.

What to describe the universe? to describe the layers of space in the universe.

Or use dimensions to locate the state and location of an event or object in cosmic space?

Take the definition of mass as an example, the definition of mass: mass is a physical property possessed by an object, a measure of the quantity of matter.

Or the dynamic definition of mass is: in relativistic space-time, mass is a measure of the energy contained in an object.

Such a definition is clear, you are not confused. But at the beginning of the dimension, you are not clear.

The full text is relatively long, and the original title "The Space-Time Philosophy of the Universe: The High Dimension Itself Deserves to Be Cautious!" >> You can check it out.

Excerpted from Chapter 34 of the popular science book "Change" by an independent scholar, poet, writer, and famous teacher of Chinese culture.