Telecom has put a wire box on the roof of the building, does it need to be approved by all owners?

1. If it is for the convenience of all owners, and the property is non-profitable, it is not necessary to seek the opinions of all owners, if the property collects money (such as site rent), except for the necessary costs, the rest will be owned by all owners;

2. The owners' committee can make decisions on behalf of all owners.

3. Negotiation between the Owners' Committee or the owner's representative or relevant stakeholders and the property.

4. "Property Management Regulations" and "Property Law".

5. What specifically affects you? Radiation or shared area, there needs to be a good reason, but I can't "think".

6. If the telecommunications equipment is national defense equipment and the whole people need assistance, if it is for profit equipment, there is no obligation.

No, because there is your common area on the roof! It's your right! You deserve it!

1. You are too big as China Telecom is the king, China Telecom is now an enterprise, and the wiring box on the roof of the building needs to be agreed by all the owners, with my China Telecom work experience, you don't have to be afraid of China Telecom!

2. What are the procedures, you are an owner, you can call China Telecom to get out of your building, and Telecom has no right to move around in your building.

3. No law, telecom is an enterprise, in fact, now the private shares of telecom are larger, in fact, it is similar to private enterprises, what are you afraid of him, tell their employees to dismantle those wire boxes, get out!

4. Directly report to the police that the telecom has trespassed into private places.

5. In a word: you are too big for China Telecom, tell them to get out, just a private enterprise! I don't believe it, check the Internet to find out who is the major shareholder of China Telecom!

The roofs are generally not owned by all the owners, because they have not been bought with money. So there is no need to consent.

If a vote is required, the document should be signed.

First through negotiation.

There is no specific law on this issue.

Right. But with little effect.

No unsolicited assistance. After all, that's something that affects the owner. But the property agreed, and the owner couldn't do anything.

In violation of the General Principles of Civil Law and Property Law, other property owners can sue the mobile company for infringement in the court to protect their rights, or through the street mediation committee to request mediation to protect their rights. The logistics department of the power supply company can only sign the use contract with the mobile on behalf of the owner under the condition that the majority of the owners agree and authorize, and if the majority of the owners do not agree to the conditions, the logistics department signs the contract is an invalid contract without authorization.

Absolutely illegal! Find a property block and don't let it be built!

Generally speaking, a certain amount of compensation was given in the past, which could be money or communication preferences.

If this is your case, you need to go to the property inspection department for consultation.

If no one accepts it, go straight to the petition.

Quite simply, go to the person in charge of the wiring and ask for a claim for the damage caused to you during the construction process.

Pro, Telecom proposes a base station in the community, which requires the consent of more than half of the owners of the community, not only the consent of the owners of the top floor. Because the roof belongs to all the owners.

Quite simply, although this lawsuit is not very easy to fight.

The ** that can sue you is the "Property Law".

Their ** is the "Telecommunications Regulations".

The regulations are general provisions and cannot contradict the law, and the conflicting part is invalid. This is the telecom overlord clause.

Of course, what has already been built cannot be destroyed without authorization, otherwise it will constitute the destruction of communication infrastructure, which is an illegal act, and a serious crime is a crime.

It can be sued, it is the property law.

Generally speaking, telecom base stations are built and planned first, and then civil buildings are established, and this kind of lawsuit is generally based on settlement compensation, and there is no precedent for this kind of compulsory demolition of telecommunications, so Moonstone said that the lawsuit is not easy to fight.

The easiest way to do this is to find out at your nearest law firm.

！Go sue it!!

What are you waiting for! Pigs!

Write such a bunch of nonsense! (I can write on paper).

Don't let me see any more information like this in the future!

1. The roof of a residential building belongs to the owners of the building, and the installation of a telecommunication transmission tower on the roof of the residential building must be agreed upon by all the owners of the building.

2. The wireless signal transmission power of the telecommunication transmission tower is small, generally not more than 20W, and the wavelength is at the level of tens of centimeters, it is easy to penetrate the human body, this electromagnetic field will not cause impact on human cells, nor will it cause oscillation, it is harmless to the human body, in comparison, the sound wave energy emitted by a shout is much stronger than the electromagnetic wave of the telecommunication transmission tower.

First of all, whether your community is set up by the property committee, if there is, it should be united, if not, you can only find the street, the petition department.

No, the telecommunications department installs the tower on the roof of the residential building in order to save money, first of all, the telecommunications department is unreasonable, second, the installation of the tower may affect the band in which you listen to the radio, and third, let them compensate or move their tower.

If they do not dismantle to the ** department to complain.

It is possible to negotiate with them.

First, compensation can be claimed.

Second, they can ask for their equipment to be removed.

The roof should be owned by all the owners, for the functional use of the roof, such as billboards, base stations and other facilities, the property will charge a certain compensation fee, the cost should belong to the owners' committee, can offset all the owners' property costs or public facilities maintenance costs, should be used after the collective decision of the owners, it is recommended that the owners' committee negotiate with the property, if the negotiation can not solve the problem, it can eventually be resolved through litigation.

Cooperate with other owners to explain the situation to the property, and if it doesn't work, notify ** together, and then explain the situation with **, and they will give an explanation.

The base station is built on the roof of the building, or the house is rented, and the antenna is just placed on the roof, which makes a big difference.

If you don't have a room for equipment, it's not a big problem to have only a small wall-mounted device.

If it is useless to ask to test the radiation, the transmit power can be adjusted at any time, and it is too easy to cheat.

The roof of the building does not belong to the exclusive part of the owner of the building, but belongs to the common part of all the owners of the building, and the owner has the right to prevent it if it is used for private purposes.

Property Law of the People's Republic of China.

On March 16, 2007, the Fifth Session of the Tenth National People's Congress passed and promulgated on the same day, and came into force on October 1, 2007).

Article 70 The owner shall enjoy the ownership of the exclusive parts of the building, such as residential and commercial buildings, and shall enjoy the right of co-ownership and joint management of the common parts other than the exclusive parts.