What do you think is a problem that humanity will never know?

Summarizing the Grand Unified Theory of the Universe?

Why did two people who once loved each other so much end up becoming strangers who are strangers stranger than strangers?

Can the people of the world be united?

How do the members of matter originating from the root come about? Billie pushed forward in front of the ball big **, before it was spherical, it was difficult to explain before.

The knotted rope counts the ropes of that time.

Crossing the threshold of death, another world.

The meaning of human existence and development.

The meaning of the universe, the meaning of life, and how to reverse entropy.

What is the meaning of human existence.

How did we get here, what is outside the universe, we may just be some experiments, locked up in a space, we call this space the universe, and we keep guessing inside... was quietly observed.

I don't know life and death and am afraid of life and death, hahahaha.

When is the next time the teacher will draw back? When is the next time a teacher checks an assignment? When is the next parent-teacher conference?

Humans cannot know the truth about things that are beyond the limits of human cognition.

If you throw away all the knowledge you have and look at the world, you will not know anything, just as a baby looks at the world

What is the purpose of the universe? - Chaowen Dao".

The question you want to know is also the question you want to sublimate.

Very much, there are a lot of unsolved mysteries,

Whether the universe is really boundless or not, just as the ancients believed that the sea and land were boundless.

The true form of the four-dimensional space, all the current theories about the four-dimensional space are only based on the conjecture of the three-dimensional, so I think that human beings cannot escape the basis of the three-dimensional to understand the four-dimensional (-

Humanity will never know why humans exist.

Is there an end to the universe, and if so, what is beyond it?

Gone after the death of the person **? Is there a soul at all?

If you want to understand this sentence, you don't have to discuss whether it's right or wrong, different perspectives, different standards, and different conclusions.

My understanding is: pay attention to how the word "world" is understood in this sentence.

If man is not intelligent, he is no different from any other animal, only as a mammal, and the relationship between man and man is only a mammalian community that lives in an animal instinctive community like an ant. It does not produce various contents such as social, cultural, etc. Such a human "world" is different from the human "world" we have now.

The difference between the two worlds is that the former does not have the self-consciousness generated by the wisdom of man and the spiritual and material culture of man brought about by this wisdom, and there is no science, religion, art (truth, goodness, and beauty).

On this basis, without human wisdom, there would be no rich spiritual content in the world we live in today.

This sentence means that without human self-awareness, even the concept of "world" is confused, let alone a world with people, and this sentence basically embodies the reaction of consciousness to material agency.

However, this sentence also violates the materialism that matter determines consciousness, because even without the existence of human beings, this world still exists objectively. Even if human beings do not have intelligence, the human world exists objectively. For example, ants have no intelligence, and the world of ants does not exist objectively?

Therefore, this sentence is very aesthetic to say, but it is beautiful to the point of idealism, and the words used in life seem quite romantic, but if it is philosophical, this is idealism that needs to be excluded.

Hope that answers your questions.

I see it this way: human beings have established the concept of "human world" because of their consciousness and cognition of themselves and the things around them, and conversely, if there were no human intelligence, there would be no such cognition, and of course there would be no concept of "human world".

Idealist thought. I think, therefore I am.