When did China pursue its policy of non alignment?

It should have been from 1980. In 1950, China and the Soviet Union formed an alliance for 30 years. As soon as the time came, China began to pursue a policy of non-alignment.

On the one hand, the reason why China does not form an alliance is that it has summed up its experience and feels that if it is aligned, it will be controlled by others to a certain extent. On the other hand, it is recognized that China has become a force to be reckoned with in the international arena, and if it forms an alliance with any superpower, it may affect the balance of strategic forces in the world and be detrimental to the stability of the international situation.

The term "non-alignment" can be traced back to a speech given by Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in Sri Lanka in 1954. Nehru took the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence (i.e., "mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity, mutual non-aggression, mutual internal affairs, equality and mutual benefit, and peaceful coexistence") put forward by Chinese Premier *** a year ago to deal with political differences between China and India as the basis of the "Non-Aligned Movement". Later, at the Bandung Conference held in 1955, the leaders of the 29 third world countries present at the conference made it clear to the world that they did not want to get involved in the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, and that they would oppose colonialism, strive for national independence, eradicate poverty, and take economic development as their goals.

The Bandung Conference was an important milestone in the development of the Non-Aligned Movement.

For example, sometimes for the sake of allies, it has to offend other countries or bear corresponding economic and military assistance obligations, so that it can concentrate on economic development, after all, development is the last word, and non-alignment can show China's determination to rise peacefully and help reduce hostile forces.

The policy of non-alignment that has been implemented since 1982 is in fact a policy implemented by a weak country, and if China today does not abandon the policy of non-alignment, it will only create greater difficulties for us in international security.

Many people mistakenly believe that by pursuing a non-aligned policy, we can avoid zero-sum relations with other countries, but this is actually a wrong concept. It is precisely because China is not aligned and does not provide security guarantees to its neighbors that it makes its neighbors fear us, leading to the formation of a zero-sum relationship.

It is determined by the national strength and national policy, and the advantage of non-alignment is to avoid getting involved in bloc confrontation and to benefit the development of the country (at least at this stage); The downside is that there is no reliable and stable external support.

The policy of non-alignment is that a country never enters into an alliance treaty with another country.

The policy of non-alignment is relative to the two major allied blocs of NATO led by the United States and the Warsaw Pact Organization led by the Soviet Union, and the main meaning of non-alignment lies in the emphasis on independence and peaceful coexistence, and its political significance is very strong.

China's non-aligned foreign policy:

Non-alignment is a basic foreign policy of China, which was born only in the Cold War period and is a means for China, as the largest and weakest developing country, to engage in great power games under the international situation of the Cold War.

Since the end of the Cold War, the global non-aligned movement has declined, and with the improvement of China's national strength and international status, Chinese academic and diplomatic circles have reflected on whether it is still necessary to adhere to the non-aligned policy. As a result of the reflection, China continues to say that it needs to maintain non-alignment, at least the official rhetoric has not changed.

Non-alignment can be regarded as a commitment made by China to the world, especially to the third world in general, and the reason why developing countries in Africa, Latin America, and other regions support China in the international political order has a great deal to do with the non-alignment policy pursued by China. <>

China should adhere to the policy of non-alignment in the current situation, because China is now at a critical juncture in its economic and social construction, and it needs a good international environment to ensure it. The policy of alliance is a struggle between major powers, and to a greater or lesser extent, it affects the domestic environment and thus the basic goals of China today.

2.At present, Vietnam, the Philippines, Japan, and other countries are encroaching on China's territory, and a certain reason is the influence of China's policy of taoguang and obscurity. However, in the past, because of this policy, friction between China and neighboring countries was reduced, and the smooth progress of economic construction was ensured.

Nowadays, China's international status is also rising, and its economic strength is also at the forefront of the world, and I think we should show a certain amount of strength in the face of some foreign aggressions related to our interests. Our country is no longer the China of more than 30 years ago, and we need to be tough to a certain extent, rather than blindly retreating. It shows the demeanor of a growing country.

We should choose a leader in affairs that have a bearing on China's interests, and blindly keeping things in the dark will only make other countries in the world think that China is still easy to bully, so that we can gain an inch of progress.

Alliances and alliances are both means and not ends. At that time, China pursued a foreign policy of non-alignment, which was forced by the international situation at that time to avoid becoming a puppet of the Soviet Union, and at the same time offended the United States, Europe and other other countries, so as not to be caught between the two major power blocs in the international arena, and at the same time united other countries in the third world. Now that the times are changing, China proposes"Rise peacefully"Although the policy of non-alignment has not been openly abandoned, in fact the SCO has the character of an alliance, and this is because China already has a certain degree of dominance in the organization, and can unite some countries against other hostile forces, which can be used by China.

Therefore, alliance or non-alliance is only a means and not an end, just one"policy"Rather than substance, everything depends on changes in the international situation and the needs of national interests.

Is a community with a shared future for mankind an alliance?

China does not engage in military expansion and does not need military alliances. But in fact, there has always been economic development.

Such a pedantic policy will only put oneself in a situation of being passively beaten!

The interpretation of nonaligned country [nonaligned country] refers to a country that implements a policy of independence, peace, neutrality and non-alignment, and participates in the Non-Aligned Conference.

Words are broadly reinterpreted.

Explanation of not knotting No knot, no knot. Liu Qing, Chapter 3 of the first part of "History of Entrepreneurship": "I knew that he was not finished, so I had to ask him to go to school for a meeting.

There is a town search official oil, he likes to talk, talk all night. The interpretation of the state is the entity that occupies a fixed territory for a long time, politically bound to a people under a sovereign **; A particular form of government, polity, or politically organized society secular state * state in China, railways belong to the state, state apparatus, state prisons, state banks, state ownership, state societies.

The non-aligned policy proposed by China at the beginning of its founding was relative to the two major alliance camps of NATO led by the United States and the Warsaw Pact Organization led by the Soviet Union. Therefore, at the same time, China has put forward the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence in International Exchanges.

The United States is an alliance with Japan, South Korea and other countries, and China has not signed an association treaty with any country. At most, we will sign some framework friendship treaties such as strategic cooperation treaties with individual countries.

On the surface, non-alignment will not be like the former Soviet Union, but whoever has a good relationship with China and has useful value understands in their hearts that they don't have to be a piece of paper. On the one hand, this is done so that there will not be a situation like the Cold War NATO vs Warsaw Pact, so that countries that have good relations with China do not have to be in a dilemma Let's take Pakistan as an analogy Needless to say, how good his relationship with China is, everyone on the earth knows it, and Americans also know it. But Pakistan is very backward after all, so it needs U.S. assistance to support the economy and military to fight terrorist organizations Some people say that China can also give these The problem is the war in Afghanistan The Taliban organization is all caused by the Americans They don't pay for it, they don't give ** and can't say it China itself doesn't want to make multiple enemies of the Taliban for no reason Those are all people who don't want to die...

At the beginning of the founding of the People's Republic of China, China signed a treaty of alliance with the Soviet Union and pursued a one-sided foreign policy, but what the actual situation was, China and the Soviet Union were still at odds with each other, so after the 30-year deadline expired in the early 80s, China did not renew the treaty. In fact, this is also a relief. Once the relationship deteriorates, what treaty can bind the relationship between them.

China needs flexible diplomatic relations. Let's just say that this time to fight Libya, the United States came out and retracted, Britain and France came out strong, and Germany and Turkey resolutely opposed. The same NATO allies, with such a big difference in attitude, is that sentence:

There are no eternal friends, only eternal interests. So believe in yourself, don't feel timid when you see others hugging on the surface, and rely on yourself for everything.

Non-alignment means not aligning with major powers, which means that China will continue to follow the path of peaceful development.

Just like Pakistan, the relationship with our country is basically an alliance.

China and the DPRK are allies, and the two sides have signed the "Sino-DPRK Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation, and Mutual Assistance" to show their alliance in the form of law. The second of these clearly states:

Article 2.

The Contracting Parties undertake to jointly take all measures to prevent aggression by any State against either of the Contracting Parties. In the event that one of the Contracting Parties is in a state of war as a result of an armed attack by any one or more States combined, the other Party shall immediately use all its power to provide military and other assistance.

On the contrary, there is no such agreement with Pakistan.

Everything is centered on the interests of the country, everything else is a floating cloud. Just as "there are no eternal friends, there are no eternal enemies, it depends on national interests", in the same way, there are no permanent slogans, there is no permanent policy of non-alignment, it depends on national interests. There are some things that the countries of the world know each other well, but it is inconvenient to say that they are broken.

Non-alignment and non-hegemony are just for foreign countries. North Korea and Pakistan are all little brothers!

It is said that it is not aligned, but in fact, the relationship with North Korea and Pakistan is closer than that of the alliance.

The so-called non-alignment itself is another form of alliance, and since the good allies have been picked by others, then the rest should be done.

Non-alignment policy! It can be doubted, but it cannot be denied.

The main thing is diplomacy with economic leverage.

On paper, yes,,, but relations with Pakistan and North Korea are not ordinary.

Please see the release date of the China-DPRK Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance and China's non-alignment policy.

Whoever your deceitful system is aligned with, and which country is willing to ally with you.

The significance of the non-aligned policy lies in emphasizing independence and self-determination, and with the strength of this policy and its own efforts, it will contribute to the establishment of a new type of state-to-state relations, to explore new ways to maintain international peace and security, to abandon the policy of military alliances, and to contribute to world peace.