Nokia E52 and Motorola A3100

Definitely Motorola A3100, you will regret it if you buy a Nokia, the Symbian system is really nothing fun.

The 3100 system is superior And the interface override is quite good The speed is also very fast The 3rd party software is rich The metal shell has a feel and the work is fine Unlike the nokia gap n large screen into the dust.

If you are not limited to **, I recommend N97, if it is expensive you suggest you buy N85, this phone is very good!

1 Full Motoa3100 5800xm

Screen resolution: 240*320, 360*640

Screen color 26W TFT 1600W TFT

Operating system WM Symbian.

CPU frequency: 528MHz 369MHz

RAM 256MB ROM, 128MB RAM 81MB

Screen size. Camera: 320W 320W (dual LED fill light).

Then all have built-in GPS navigation modules.

5800 with gravity sensing.

In terms of parameters, moto is better.

WM's operating system works with a high-frequency CPU and a relatively large amount of RAM.

It's an ideal business jet.

Look at what LZ is mainly doing.

If the LZ is going to buy a business jet, the MotoA 3100 is obviously stronger than the 5800.

But the advantage of the 5800 is that it is nokia.

The online resources are abundant, and the software expansion ability is relatively strong (the fifth version of S60 is actually not a lot of software now).

The appearance style of the 5800 is more atmospheric.

The moto standby time is not as long as 5800.

Anyway, if it's more business-oriented, it's moto.

If not, 5800

First of all, 5800 is the first touch screen product of the Symbian S60 system, so it is inferior to A3100 in terms of technical experience, after all, the touch screen mobile phone produced by Motorcycle has a lot of classics, experience, and tougher technology, and the technology of Windows Mobile system to support touch operation is also very mature, so from the touch aspect A3100 is stronger than 5800; Secondly, from the system aspect, the Symbian system does not have as high requirements for mobile phone hardware as the Windows Mobile system, so on the whole, Symbian does not have the richness of Windows Mobilede in terms of performance and software expansion (although the CPU frequency of 5800 is lower than that of A3100, but because the framework of the 5800 Symbian system and the A3100 Windows Mobile system are different, Symbian has lower requirements for the CPU, So the 5800's ability to get out of the inside is just as good); From the point of view of the network, A3100 is better than 5800, maybe you have seen it from the advertisement, A3100 is the first mobile phone in China to support 3G Wi-Fi WAPI at the same time, perhaps.

In the future, mobile phones will support WAPI. Of course, the A3100 came out late, and the moisture is higher than 5800, of course, 5800 is currently more cost-effective than A3100. You can wait and see for a while, and wait for the price of the A3100 to drop before you can buy it.

Whatever you choose, I wish you the best of luck in your purchase....

Of course, the price is 5800, now it's only 1800-1900 yuan, 5800 The screen is a little bigger than inches, and A3100 is inches and it won't be small, The pixels are 3.2 million, It's almost enough to take pictures, The memory is almost the sameA3100 local memory is more than 8G, 5800 is also, The memory card supports memory 16GA3100 is good, 5800 can support memory card 8G A3100 The operating system is Windows Mobile Professional, The same system as your computer, 5800 is Symbian S60, the fifth version, of course the system is A3100 is better, but if you don't want too strong functions, 5800 is also enough, 5800 is more suitable for entertainment, A3100 runs faster, CPU speed is 524zhm Both are touch screens. If you don't understand something, you can send it to me.

You don't have to think about Moto, the A3100 is much more playable than it.

The A3100 is WM's system, and the playability is much stronger than Nokia's S60, and the S60V5 now has very little software.

Recommend A3100,You go to check and check WM software as many as a cow,There is no problem that you said that there is less moto software。

A3100 is better Whether it is the CPU or the operating system Play the machine to a certain time, I feel that the S60 is relatively low-level The appearance of 5800 is good-looking After all, the Ming series is full of aesthetic fatigue...

Nokia can't do it It took more than a decade to build a touchscreen phone.

Now 5800 can't drink 3100 than in another 3 years, the mobile phone will stay at the level of 3100, and I have no confidence in Nuo.

n86.Whether it is the appearance or usability, it is N86And the N86 is more stylish.

86 is Symbian, A3100 is WM Symbian is easier to operate If you text a lot, the A3100's touch screen is probably going to drive you crazy or the 86 is better, and the 86's camera is also very good.

The 86 is also gorgeous I recommend you to get the 86 The performance of the 86 is still very good.