Can anyone take these three questions seriously? 30

The first question, which I think can be solved from the point of view of "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword": in this book, the author constantly mentions many of the actions of the Japanese that seem strange to Westerners, such as "how friendly Japan was to the victorious countries after the defeat in World War II?" The Japanese accepted the defeat and all its consequences with great kindness.

They greeted the Americans with a bow, a smile waving, and even cheering. This is obviously a far cry from the view of most scholars at the time, who were "impressed by the terrible doctrine of non-surrender," that "in the eyes of the Japanese, defeat is an insult and they will fight to the death to take revenge." Similarly, in 1862, after the defeat of the Japanese belligerent Satsuma Domain at the hands of the British, they did not seek revenge, but instead sought friendship with the British.

The author attributes these phenomena to "the sentiment of the part". "Affection" is, simply put, a value that defends honor and self-esteem, washes away shame and failure, and this value requires that people only regard reputation as an enduring goal, and the achievement of this goal can be determined according to the circumstances. With such values and social norms, it is not surprising that the Japanese would behave in the wake of their defeat.

Because their goal is only to preserve their reputation, and their revenge and aggression in the war are only means to protect their reputation, "they have made great efforts or failed, which means to them that aggression is not the way to win honor in the end", and there can be two equal means of winning reputation, "on the one hand, the use of aggressive means, and on the other hand, mutual respect." "At the time of defeat, the Japanese switched from the former to the latter," but they "did not feel any psychological pressure on themselves" because they were still defending their reputations.

I'm sorry for the second and third questions, I didn't understand...

Everyone, cheer for everyone.

These three questions are different from each other, and after answering, they are arguing, and if you look at the questions you ask, you know that you are asking the questions with tendencies, which is not good, and since you have the answer in your heart, I will not argue with you.

Looking at the problem, first of all, there is a position, as a Chinese, love your country is the first, just like the marriage vow, patriotism is not because he is poor or rich, because this is the root, this is the bone thing.

History is written by the victors, but why is the official history so bright, not because there is no darkness, on the contrary, politics has always been black and outrageous, but no matter who wins in the end, they will write that bright side, because it is beautiful, right, and should be passed on to future generations, but it is not that it is right to put it now, so it is necessary to read history dialectically, and leave its essence from its dross.

Now many people are very interesting, because the positive writing of history says that history is deceiving us, but in fact, falling to the ground is deception, or are you not reading it seriously? No matter who it is, when leaving history for future generations, it is subject to the restrictions of the ruling class, but the historian is to look at history fairly, which is a good habit of the Chinese nation, so the darkness is not not written, it is not clearly written, and the fun of reading history books is not in reading the surface of the book, but in reading the words between the lines, and tasting right and wrong.

History books are just a guide, it is the direction that the ruling class of that era wants you to go, and for us, by reading history books, the purpose is to read the history we see, restore the truth of history in our hearts, what is tampered with is not tampered with, change is normal and not change is great, sometimes it can be said to be stupid, don't be affected by foreign liberalization, just say what is unfair, poisoned thoughts, restricted thoughts, in fact, the unrestricted is the most unfree, because without the fundamentals, freedom, in fact, is just a wild man.

I'm sorry I didn't have any questions from you, because I knew the answer to your question, and I would be noisy and shouting because of different interests, but I didn't get anything.

Let's answer the first question, self-esteem? Japan? Hehe, in fact, many things have historical reasons, next to such a great country as China, what self-esteem does Japan have?

The so-called self-esteem is just an extreme reflection of inferiority, to know the present, when you ask the past, read history, history is nothing more than people, between the savage and the civilized man, the self-esteem of the savage is a manifestation of self-confidence or the extreme cover of inferiority? This is my opinion, right or wrong in vain smiled, hehe.

Japan is not a self-respecting nation, they are a nation that consciously obeys the hierarchy, and if they lose to the United States, they are inferior to the United States, and as a junior brother, if the United States wants to destroy them, they will not resist.

1.Japan, like China, is a country without a religion, and like the Han people, it has no national faith. But the Japanese believe in authority, and the Americans are stronger than them, so they obey the Americans.

Summary. Hello dear, happy to answer for you, what kind of questions can you have? We can answer the following types of questions for you:

1.Psychological problems. Psychological problems are different from physical diseases, it is caused by people's internal mental factors, to be precise, a series of problems caused by the central nervous system of the brain, which will indirectly change people's personality, world view and emotions.

2.Emotional issues in life: We have professional emotional coaches who can solve a range of problems for you, including marriage, love, and so on.

3.The type of social and livelihood life, such as finding the address, as well as solving the problems in life, and those who do not understand the common sense of life.

Can you answer my question when the time comes.

Hello dear, happy to answer for you, what kind of questions can you have? We can answer the following types of questions for you:1

Psychological problems. Psychological problems are different from physical diseases, it is caused by people's internal mental factors, to be precise, a series of problems caused by the central nervous system of the brain, which will indirectly change people's personality, world view and emotions. 2.

Emotional problems in life: We have professional emotional coaches who can solve a series of problems for you, including marriage, love, and so on. 3.

The type of social and livelihood life, such as finding the address, as well as solving the problems in life, and those who do not understand the common sense of life.

Can recruits bring allergy medicine montelukast sodium tablets to the army.

Recruits can bring allergy medicine montelukast sodium tablets to the army, which does not affect.

Because it's a must-have medicine for you.

Will the medicine be confiscated when you get to the army?

No, the troops will not confiscate it, you just need to report it.