What is the central thesis of There is much help for the righteous, but little help for the unjust

The time is not as good as the location, and the location is not as good as the people.

The central argument of the righteous and the unrighteous is not the same:The time is not as good as the place, the geographical advantage is not as good as the people.

Theme: There is much help for the righteous, and little help for the unjust. In a general article, the "central thesis" and the "main purpose" are the same, and this article uses the war to talk about the principles of governance, so the "viewpoint" and the "main purpose" are inconsistent.

This article is a short essay, which discusses the problem of the people's will in the war, points out that the people's will is the main factor in the victory or defeat of the war, highlights the decisive role of "people" in the victory or defeat of the war, and embodies Mencius.

The "benevolent government." Thought.

Mencius lived in the middle of the Warring States period, when wars were fierce, and he advocated "benevolent government" to unify the world. Mencius believed that among the three conditions that determine the outcome of a war, "time, place, and harmony," "harmony" is the primary condition for defeating the enemy, and the result of "winning peace" is "victory in battle."

Original text of the work

The time is not as fast as the location, and the location is not as good as the people. The city of three miles, the Guo of seven miles, the ring and attack it without victory. If the husband attacks it, there will be those who have the right time, but the one who does not win is not as good as the location.

The city is not high, the pool is not deep, the military revolution is not strong, and the rice millet (sù) is not much.

Therefore, it is said: The people of the domain do not use the boundaries of the frontier, the country does not use the danger of mountains and streams, and the world does not take the benefits of the military revolution. Those who have attained the Tao have much help, and those who have lost the Tao have little help.

The widow is helpless, and the relatives are beside them; If you help more, the world will follow it. With the world's obedience, attack the relatives of the side, so the gentleman does not fight, the battle will be won.

Arguments are more convincing by using examples and contrasting arguments to demonstrate the central point.

The central thesis of this article is: "The time is not as good as the place, and the location is not as good as the people".

It is inferred that the governance of the people, the country, and the world cannot rely on "the boundary of the frontier", "the danger of mountains and streams", and "the benefit of soldiers", but must rely on "attaining the way", that is, the implementation of "the royal road" and "benevolent government".

Dear, this is my word by word code... I hope you are satisfied.

There is much help for the righteous and little help for the unjust.

The central argument is: the time is not as good as the location, and the location is not as simple as people.

Meaning: The weather and seasons that are conducive to combat are not as good as the geographical situation that is conducive to operations, the geographical situation that is conducive to operations, and the aspirations of the people and internal unity in operations.

There is much help for the righteous, and little help for the unjust, from "Mencius.

Gongsun Chouxia" means that standing in terms of justice and benevolence, he will get the support and help of the majority; If we violate morality and benevolence, we will inevitably fall into isolation. The article compares the "time", "location" and "people", and progresses layer by layer. It proves the truth that "the time is not as good as the location, and the location is not as good as the people".

The central thesis of "Those who have attained the Tao have much help, and those who have lost the Tao have little help" is: the time is not as good as the place, and the place is not as good as the people. "There is much help for the righteous, but little help for the unjust" is a famous statement of Mencius.

Mencius inherited and developed Confucius's idea of rule by virtue, which developed into the doctrine of benevolent government, which became the core of his political thought. He applied the principles of "proximity" and "longevity" to politics in order to ease class contradictions and safeguard the long-term interests of the feudal ruling class.

In the first paragraph, the author presents that the central argument is composed of the comparison of time, place, and people. The two "inferior" in the middle are connected, indicating a progressive relationship, and one is more important than the other. Putting forward an argument in this way makes the point of view even more clear.

In the second paragraph, it is argued that "the time is right, the place and the people". Taking the setting of the time occupation of the sky cannot break the land advantage as an example, the importance of "time of the day" is compared with the "geographical advantage". "The city of three miles, the Guo of seven miles" shows that the city is small and difficult to defend; "Ring and attack" shows that the besiegers are strong in attack and occupy the initiative in battle; "And not winning" means that the attacker has failed.

The battle will end with the weak winning and the strong losing.

The author believes that the reason why the offensive and defensive forces dare to overwhelm the territory is because they have an advantage in "time", but the defenders can resist by virtue of their "geographical advantages"; If the attacking side cannot attack for a long time, the army will be discouraged and will inevitably fail. This convincingly proves the correctness of the thesis that "time is not as good as place".

In the third paragraph, it is argued that "the geographical advantage is not as good as the people". Taking having good geographical conditions and not being able to defend them as an example, compare the importance of "geographical advantage" and "people". "Chenggao", "Chishen", "Bingge Jianli", and "Misu Duo" indicate that the defenders have superior "geographical" conditions and could have won the final victory in the war.

However, the result was "entrusted to go" because there was no "harmony" internally, and even if there were good conditions, it could not play a role, but was defeated by the attackers who had "people" although they did not have "geographical advantages", which effectively illustrated the truth that "geographical advantages are not as good as people."

1. The argumentation idea of "The Righteous Help the Unrighteous and the Unrighteous Help": At the beginning of this chapter, the central argument is put forward, and the general example is used to prove it, and then the argument is theoretically made, and the thesis of "those who have attained the Tao are more helpful, and those who have lost the Tao are less helpful", clarifying the essence of "people". At the end of the article, he concludes with a "gentleman" who wins "harmony" and "those who win the battle will win the battle", which prominently explains that "harmony" is the most important condition for determining the outcome of a war.

2. "Born in Sorrow and Die in Peace" argument ideas: The article first talks about the problem of cultivating talents, and first takes six dignitaries from humble backgrounds who have gone through various trials and finally have "great responsibilities" as examples to illustrate that talents are created in a difficult environment, and at the same time attach importance to people's subjective factors, and put forward the view of "trapped in the heart, balanced in consideration, and then done".

It shows from two aspects that in order for people to make a difference and achieve great causes, they must undergo a difficult and even painful tempering in their lives, thoughts, and behaviors. Then, from the individual to the state, he points out that the factors that determine the survival of the state are similar to the factors that determine whether the individual can achieve great things, and finally puts forward the argument.

What is the argument that the righteous have much help and the unjust have little help?

Hello hungry, you can try the argument idea of the righteous and the unjust, and the unrighteous and unjust. The main feature of the argument is that it adopts the argument structure of "total-paralimb finger-total".

First, put forward the central thesis that "the time is not as good as the location, and the location is not as good as the people"; Then set up examples to prove that "the time is not as good as the location", "the location is not as good as the people"; Finally, the central argument is argued in terms of reason.