Is it difficult to argue? Is there any secret to studying for the exam and getting a high score?

Hello, the experts of the Zhongzheng Essay Preparation Program will be happy to answer for you. As a subject in the civil service recruitment examination and some public institution examinations, the essay examination is a test of simulated administrative ability. Whether it is difficult or not varies from person to person.

Since the question is in the form of a subjective question, the question is presented in the form of a material of several thousand words, so there is no single answer. It is recommended that you check the real questions of the public examination in recent years, check the analysis provided by well-known public examination training institutions, communicate with candidates on the Internet, obtain information through different channels, and then formulate a personalized review plan, and strictly implement it, so that you can really improve the level of argumentation. Learning is a process of finding problems and solving problems, ask questions in time, and experts in the preparation program are willing to study with you and cheer together.

Essay on memorizing model essays, memorizing the beginning and ending sentences of the classics,

Difficult.

For learning to apply for arguments, early preparation and early accumulation play a crucial role in optimizing the language, improving the level of writing, and ultimately improving the score. The reason why this type of question is difficult is that it is not just looking for a single point like inductive generalization, such as summarizing the problem, successful experience, causes, harms, etc., but the key points related to the keyword of the question stem must be found, and if you want to be comprehensive, this invisibly increases the difficulty.

Precautions for argumentation.

A few points to note: It is best to write an argument in each department, whether it is a problem or a problem, to use the "one, two, three" level of expression, to show that your file is organized.

Be sure to justify yourself, each person's problem or focus from the material may be different, you must change around the problem, draw your own opinions, and then analyze the problem around your own opinions, and then propose a solution.

It is very important to start the line and summarize, generally the beginning is to lead to the problem, express the concern about what the problem, and end with the prospect of the development of the problem on the basis of proposing a solution to the problem.

It's hard to argue. The overall difficulty of Argument 1 is a little more difficult than Argument 3, and Argument 1 is more demanding than Argument 3.

Argument 1 is the most difficult, mainly reflected in: the theme selection is in line with current political hotspots, and it is relatively abstract, and it is difficult to understand; There will be some difficult questions in the small questions, which will affect the score; Essays are more difficult to comprehend when it comes to subject matter.

Deuteronomy 123 Differences:

1. The focus of ability is different.

2. The subject of the examination is different.

Deuteronomy 1 2 3 will give 5 6 pieces of material, and each material will revolve around a macro theme. The subject matter of Deut. 1 is more abstract and needs to be analyzed in depth in combination with national facts. For example, the "rush for the exam" in 2021.

2020's "Changing and Unchanging Roundness"; The theme of Argument 2 is more inclined to the grassroots, mainly related to grassroots governance, rural revitalization, and rural issues. The theme of Argument 3 is biased towards law enforcement and rule of law, which is related to laws and regulations, law enforcement principles, and the construction of law and law.