Is evolution a scientific, philosophical, hypothesis, or conjecture?

Updated on science 2024-02-29
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Evolution is science. Since it is a 'theory', it is not a hypothesis or conjecture. The theory of evolution is a branch of science and has nothing to do with philosophy.

    In the field of science, the "theory" is the highest scientific achievement, and it is established because it can explain the observed facts, if there is a "theory" that does not conform to the facts, it will not become a "theory", but will be modified until all the observed facts are in accordance with the "theory", so far, the theory of evolution is still as stable as a mountain, and there are no facts that do not conform to the theory of evolution have been cited, and all relevant scientists accept the theory of evolution.

    The theory of biological evolution, referred to as the theory of evolution, is one of the most basic theories of biology (evolution), which refers to the evolution and development of organisms under the action of variation, heredity and natural selection, the process of species elimination and species generation. There was no life on the earth, about 3 billion years ago, under certain conditions, primitive life was formed, and since then, life has continued to evolve, until there are more than 1.7 million species in the world today.

    The theory of biological evolution was first proposed by Charles Robert Darwin, and is discussed in detail in his famous book "The Origin of Species". There are three classical evidences for the theory of evolution: comparative anatomy, paleontology, and the law of embryonic development, all of which are the result of Darwin's tireless efforts.

    The development of Darwin's idea of biological change and his view of nature about the transformation and evolution of all things can be traced back to the early days of human civilization.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Darwin was a pastor at first, and evolution was conjecture, not science. Because no living things were found before the Cambrian period, the Cambrian strata have many well-preserved fossils. Known as the Cambrian Statement Great**.

    There are also dinosaurs that evolved into birds, but there is no connection in between, and after the discovery of Archaeopteryx in Germany, in the 90s, according to the claws, it was found that Archaeopteryx was not the ancestor of birds. Later China discovered the Archaeoraptor, but later it was discovered that the Archaeopteria was a combination of the Microraptor and another bird because they misspelled it. Darwin was advised to choose another way to evolve:

    The first bird flew out of a dinosaur egg. Darwin: If that's the case, my theory is in ruins. You can also watch "On the Origin of Species", but in fact, Darwin also had doubts.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I thought it was strange at the time, because a lot of the timelines matched. And the way the pyramids were built is also very close to what I know.

    But there are a few places where the whole article is completely reflected in the form of a ** description. And there's a key point, which is evolution. Although earthlings were not entirely evolutionary, the predecessors of earthlings were indeed apes.

    Also, the souls on earth are separated into two parts, and I don't know if I mentioned it or not, because I didn't look closely. Mainly, what is described in the book is that people of all colors have immigrated from various planets. In this way, the process of evolution is completely denied.

    But there are a lot of things that really match, for example, topics like the crystals of Atlantis.

    The most important thing is that the book was published in 1993, and at that time, many of the messages conveyed in the book had already begun to circulate in the world.

    Therefore, it cannot be denied that this book was written by the author by sorting out the information and then writing it in the form of **.

    However, if the information brought by the non-conscious consciousness is brought back to the conscious consciousness, it will usually form a more or less misinterpretation, and it cannot be ruled out that the author may have also misinterpreted it.

    In short, some of the information in the book fits well, but some of it is also very.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Hypothesis. Because the theory of relativity, although plausible, has not yet been fully proven, the theory of evolution is a hypothesis proposed by Darwin.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Confirmed science. Because the principles of evolution have been proven to exist, they are not fake, but real science.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Many people mistakenly think that evolution is a scientific theory that has been demonstrated, but in fact evolution is only a hypothesis, and it is a hypothesis that the whole world is looking for fault with. The theory of evolution is so flawed that even the evidence that underpins the hypothesis has been disproved. The dismantling of the three major evidences of evolution makes this hypothesis possible to become a permanent hypothesis, and it is too difficult to prove the origin of species.

    There are three classical evidences for evolution: comparative anatomy, paleontology, and the law of repetition of embryonic development.

    Darwinian evolution found a reversal.

    Comparative Anatomy: Exposing the logical errors of evolutionary theory.

    Scientifically, if the proof of a theory violates logic, the theory cannot be established, but people do not deeply correct the logical errors of the theory of evolution, and it is also because of the deep correction that there is no evidence to speak of. For example, to argue evolution with comparative anatomy, figuratively speaking, "If man had evolved from ape, man and ape would have many similar characteristics; Because there are many similarities between man and ape, man evolved from ape.

    Anyone who understands logic knows that this kind of circular argument is meaningless, for example, "If A is B's younger brother, A is smaller than B; Because A is smaller than B, A is B's younger brother. Of these two propositions, the first is true and the second is false. This specious "proof" runs through all the evidence for evolution.

    People followed suit, and people blindly accepted it.

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    It's a science that's been recognized. Because many scientists have discovered that organisms are constantly evolving, and they are changing their bodies because of their environment.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    I think it's confirmed that science is because everything in the world has evolved, especially us humans have evolved from animals.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The essence of the theory of evolution is genetics, and the appearance of genetics is the theory of evolution.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    The Origin of Humanity Episode 1.

Related questions
10 answers2024-02-29

In old age, people will believe in fate to some extent.

Darwin married his cousin Emma, and three of their six children died in infancy, and the other three remained barren for life. This obviously cast a considerable psychological shadow on Darwin, and even doubted all his previous views. >>>More

3 answers2024-02-29

Darwin's theory of evolution consists mainly of four sub-theories: >>>More

9 answers2024-02-29

The Birth and Development of Mankind: Humans were born 5 million years ago. That is to say, 60 million years after the extinction of the dinosaurs, human beings were born Human beings are differentiated from the animal kingdom, and taxonomically, homo sapiens belongs to the subphylum Vertebrates, Mammalia, Primates, Anthropoids, and Hominis. >>>More

4 answers2024-02-29

Science constructs models of social and natural phenomena based on mathematical theories, and verifies the authenticity and reliability of the models by designing experiments or observations. >>>More

5 answers2024-02-29

Gundam is divided into several series,Each series has its own unique world view and story line,Generally speaking, UC is "Universal Century", that is, "Cosmic Century",The first Gundam was filmed in 0079,Using the UC year,The animation is based on Tomino's ** adaptation,That is to say,Gundam 0079 (Gundam Z (Gundam ZZ (Char of the counterattack (Gundam Unicorn (this is also known as Gundam UC, It's just the UC of Unicorn (Unicorn), not Universal Century (Universal Century), but it's also about the universe century (thing, you can see in the film that the characters from Gundam 0079 and Gundam Z have appeared, ahhhh Amuro only has a side face photo, but Kai Ye is handsome], Gundam F91 (Gundam V (, and a very controversial work "Turna Gundam", this work created in 2000 contains the world view and body of all Gundams before 2000, the plot is very good, the style of painting was already very good at the time, the controversy actually originated from the body design, there are many people who don't like the wild boar's beard-like Gundam antenna, so they spray everywhere, and then many people start to follow suit, A good work is buried like this. I really like its design [I personally feel that Turna is also UC.,Not only because it's created by Tomino.,You can also see that most of the bodies are in the chronology.,Although there are a few other series of machines.,But when I saw the Meteor Hammer and Zaku, my whole body burned and I put it in my heart and put it in UC].