Who has English references in the direction of construction project management additional points ar

Summary. Project management consulting and enterprise management consulting are inseparable, and it is one-sided and not objective to emphasize project management consulting alone, and any project management consulting is inseparable from the organization's structure and organizational settings, and the correct project management consulting should stand at the height of the organization, using the organization's strategy and planning to analyze and diagnose the current situation and problems of the organization's project management. The biggest difference between project management consulting and organizational management consulting is that through the external manifestations of organizational management strategies, system processes, regulations and human resources, and through the application of systematic and scientific knowledge systems and methods of project management consulting, project management standards and methods are improved, shaped and transformed under the existing organizational structure, and the scientific, professional and external value of project management are reshaped.

Therefore, the project management consulting system is an important part of the enterprise management consulting system, in addition to the general characteristics of enterprise management consulting, it also needs to use multi-disciplinary and multi-professional project management knowledge, technology, tools and methods and systematically integrate with the project management knowledge system, so as to give full play to the value of project management consulting.

Hello, PMC is often used as the abbreviation of "Project Management Consultancy".

Project management consulting and enterprise management consulting are inseparable, emphasizing that project management consulting is one-sided and not objective, any project management consulting is inseparable from the organization's structure and organizational settings, and the correct project management consulting should be based on the height of the organization, the use of the organization's strategy and planning to analyze and diagnose the current situation and problems of the organization's project management. The biggest difference between project management consulting and organizational management consulting is that through the external manifestations of organizational management strategies, system processes, regulations and human resources, and through the application of systematic and scientific knowledge systems and methods of project management consulting, project management standards and methods are improved, shaped and transformed under the existing organizational structure, and the scientific, professional and external value of project management are reshaped. Therefore, the project management consulting system is an important part of the enterprise management consulting system, in addition to the general characteristics of enterprise management consulting, it is also necessary to use multi-disciplinary and multi-professional project management knowledge, technology, tools and methods and systematically integrate with the project management knowledge system, so as to give full play to the value of project management consulting.

The Master of Project Management (MPM) is a track of the Master of Engineering.

The Master of Engineering is managed by the National Steering Committee for Professional Degree Education of Master of Engineering under the National Degree Office.

The Master of Engineering in Project Management was established in 2003 by Tsinghua University and Beihang University.

1.This article is written against the backdrop of the traditional design-bid-build model of a project.

2.In the event of a major design in which the contradictions are reconciled and all parties are informed in a timely manner, then this is feasible.

3.It is necessary to check whether the budget is consistent with the scope of the project to get the project back on track; Or, if the additional funds can be approved, justify the additional costs to the owner.

1.This article is based on the traditional design-bid-construction model.

2.This is possible in some of the major design milestones where these changes can be identified and informed action has been taken.

3.Verification of budget scope corrections to get the project back on track or, if it is possible to approve an additional budget, to justify the additional costs to the owner.

I want an English dude.

Oh, I admire, I also want to study engineering English.

1. A reputable tip from an owner for partial payment, reasonable clearance for the big auction and final payment, and a more attractive situation in dealing with the contractor rather than throwing out the bureaucratic hurdles.

2. The contractor must weigh all these factors, including how much overhead and profit must be added to the work to compensate for the negatives and risks. Will the number of possible competitors (including an assessment of which competitors probably) allow for the desired marking? If it is decided that the bid cannot support the desired markup, is the job still worth bidding at a lower mark?

That is, the possibility of that problem is also winning the bid if the mark is maintenance. Does there really a chance to become a successful tender that proves the effort and cost of the tender effort? Is the opportunity to complete the work justified with the expected overhead and profit bid costs, the resources required (personnel, equipment, and finance), and the assumption of risk?

If the risk is not fully reflected in the mark, the risk must be taken into account because of the current tender climate.

3. This is reflected in the final mark (overhead and profit) that the contractor includes in the bid.

4. Pay attention to some contractors and not increase or decrease their marking, including a contingency amount for risk. Whether a contractor is different to mark or supplement the emergency, the effect is the same, and only the terminology is different.

1. A landlord with a reputation for timely payment, able to clear and settle final payments reasonably, and work with contractors to abandon bureaucracy, which is undoubtedly a more attractive situation.

2. Contractors must also consider the current bidding trends. How many projects are being tendered? How many of them are more attractive?

How many bidders will bid for this project? How many are likely to bid for other projects that are also undergoing public tenders? This element relates to a very basic question, does the contractor need to work?

What is the current backlog?

Contractors who need a project are more likely to look for a potential job than to focus on whether they have a sufficient backlog.

3 This will be reflected in the final profit (overhead and profit) of the contractor who bids for it.

4. It is important to pay attention to the amount of unexpected expenses of some contractors, rather than just thinking about increasing or decreasing their profits. Whether a contractor changes profits or increases unexpected expenses, the effect is the same, but the expression is different.