About the uselessness of learning, the uselessness of reading?

Is reading necessarily useful?

In the process of learning, doing useless work is a waste of time, a waste of money, a waste of one's life, in the process of learning, you should learn something that is really useful to yourselfAt the same time, it is also necessary to master some learning methods.

Make yourself able to complete tasks quickly and efficiently during the learning process.

In the learning process, only by constantly summarizing and learning lessons can we keep ourselves from doing some useless things, improve ourselves, and have efficient learning methods. <>

First, I don't know how to summarize learning methods

In the learning process, everyone will almost summarize their own set of learning methods, and this method is very practical for themselves, which can improve their efficiency and allow them to absorb the most knowledge in the shortest time.

And doing some useless work in the learning process is not finding your own learning method, wasting your time all the time, and in the end you have not learned anything useful.

Therefore, in the learning process, we must accumulate experience and summarize some of our own learning methods, so that we can improve. <>

Second, doing useless work is a waste of time

Nowadays, many young people are very smart, and they know how to constantly learn lessons and sum up experience in the learning process, so that they can get better and better in the learning process and be better in their future work.

But there are some people who are always doing useless things in their studies and work, and they are not improving themselves or completing any tasks, which is a waste of their own time and that of others. <>

Therefore, don't do some useless things in the learning process, improve your learning efficiency, so that you can complete the task quickly and efficiently, and at the same time, you should continue to learn some knowledge, and continue to accumulate experience to make yourself better and better in the future work and learning process, instead of wasting your time and energy.

I think it's better not to do anything than to do something meaningless under the banner of studying, and this kind of thinking is not right, and the practice is also wrong.

I think that useless work in learning is that we do a lot of useless things, and then we spend a lot of energy, so that there is no improvement in our grades.

I think that useless work in learning is also meaningful, because no one can do 100% useful work, and it is because of useless work that we can find the right way.

It is equally important to learn uselessly, learn to learn on your own.

Learning attitude refers to the readiness of learners to affirm or deny their behavior or internal reaction to learning for a long time. It can usually be judged and explained from the positive aspects of the student's attention, emotional state, and volitional state towards learning.

Students' attitudes towards learning may include attitudes towards curriculum learning, learning materials, teachers, and schools.

Regulation of learning attitude on learning behavior:

First of all, it is manifested in the selection of learning objects. In this regard, the psychologist Jones conducted the following experimental study: they took two groups of white college students in the southern United States as subjects, and the first group usually showed an attitude of opposing racial discrimination and opposing black and white schools.

The second group is racist, advocating for black and white branches. In the experiment, participants were asked to read aloud eleven essays against black and white schools. Participants are then asked to write as completely as possible about what they have read.

It was found that the first group of students, i.e., those whose learning materials were consistent with their attitudes, performed significantly better than the second group.

In other words, materials that are consistent with pre-existing attitudes are easily absorbed, assimilated, and memorized, while materials that are contrary to the beliefs and values of the individual are easily blocked or distorted. It can be seen that attitudes have a certain filtering effect.

Education and work are completely inconsistent. After graduation, the work engaged in is not at all compatible with the major I studied, for example, a person who studied finance and accounting took the civil service examination for garden management, and this kind of work that does not match at all feels very uncomfortable. But he was still able to pass the exam, and he was also trained to learn slowly at work, and he didn't use what he learned in school, and his self-esteem was trampled on.

The second is the collision of ideal beauty with the bony feeling of reality. This is also a very frustrating one. There are many young teachers who teach children, when they have just graduated, they are full of confidence and fighting spirit, and they use the knowledge they have learned in school to teach all of them to their students, but the students' grades are often not particularly good.

After practical exploration, as I grew older, I found that comprehensible memory is not as good as cramming teaching. As a result, there were many strict teachers, using harsh methods, constantly training students, but the grades rose very quickly. This feeling of learning is not used, but also a kind of trampling, many things to learn and things applied in practice are not the same, learning is not used, the psychological gap will be very large.

The third is that learning is useless. There are a lot of majors that you will find out when you finish studying them. You don't know what your major will be used for in the future, even if everyone is encouraging you when you are studying, you can engage in this industry, you can engage in that industry, but when you go out of the classroom, you will find that all industries don't need you, and you can't use it, so this major, should it die?

The idea that reading is useless has existed since ancient times, so let's take a look at which parents will hold the idea of "reading is useless" for their children.

A powerful and noble parent. Some powerful parents do not attach importance to their children's education, just as Confucius's disciple Zilu said, "There are people and people, there is society, why bother to study, and then study?" "Meaning, with people, land, food, what books do you read?

To have food is to "learn". Can books be eaten as food? The children of powerful parents are "born with a golden key", and they seem to be destined to have the right to be rich, and there is no need to use "knowledge to change their fate", for them, how to make life brilliant, wonderful or happy is what they are pursuing, what is the use of dying to study?

Unless you love it very much, it's a waste of time.

Second, parents who do business. In addition, parents who do business in the society, many will also have the idea that reading is useless, such parents generally rely on their own hard work, or tired, or small success, but do not have much hope for their children's studies, do not expect children to open up new horizons through their studies, from their experience, money is a measure of a person's value, reading is useful, but "as much as I believe in books, it is better to have no books", social experience and experience are more important, children have a certain cultural foundation, and it is useless to learn so much, On the contrary, it is a waste of money, it is better to give up your studies and go out directly to mix in society or come to pick up your parents' class. Therefore, many children are influenced by their parents on the one hand, on the other hand, their parents ignore their children's studies because of business, and they do not focus on learning.

That's how the local tyrants came about, right?

3. Parents who are engaged in manual labor. The argument that parents who engage in manual labor are useless for reading is based on two ideas. One is that he thinks that he has a low culture, lacks correct guidance for his child's studies, and is not confident in his children's studies, resulting in thoughts such as "I have no culture, and my child's culture can be high".

Second, under the double pressure of soaring education costs and low employment flows, college graduates are not allocated and self-employed, making it impossible for poor groups (especially rural areas) to go into debt to study and repay their debts, and the phenomenon of losing and dropping out of junior high school students is serious, making the phenomenon of the uselessness of reading in rural areas increasingly aggravated.

In this era, graduate students are rotten on the street", "Three books are not considered universities at all", "Cleaning is all undergraduate", "High-end restaurant waiters have to be born from graduate school", "Two books are simply a shame in life", "Hey, what's the use of studying, when you graduate from graduate school, don't you still have to work for a junior college?" ”

We often brush up on such jokes, which makes people panic, no, I remember when I was a child, wasn't every family's dream and expectation to have their children admitted to college? How great it is to be admitted to university, and immediately become the pride of the whole village, why is it worthless to be admitted to university in our generation? Is this true?

According to the big data in 2015, only 27% of the population has a high school degree or above, and the high school enrollment rate in 2018 is that ninety percent of children have the opportunity to go to high school, which is not excessive, and the population with a college degree or above is 90 million, accounting for the total population and the population of the same age, that is to say, as long as you go to college or above, you have beaten more than half of your peers. China's bachelor's degree accounts for 17% of the total population, accounting for 17% of peers, that is to say, if you are an undergraduate, you will beat 97% of the country's people and 83% of your peers in terms of academic qualifications.

Did I hear me right? Second, it is a shame in life? Could it be that the whole population is living without shame?

Those who account for more than 211 of the national population, accounting for 2% of their peers, and 211,985 are admitted whether they are the whole country or their peers, you have been absolutely crushed, the current proportion of graduate students in the country is only, and it only accounts for among peers, and only those with a graduate degree of more than 211 account for only one of the same age population, that is the dragon and phoenix among the people! Just tell me how many restaurants are so good, and the waiters are still gradists? Doctoral students only account for 10,000 percent of the total population, that is, this doesn't sound like a feeling, a reference, the proportion of multimillionaires in my country is 10,000, that is to say, the number of doctoral students is less than half of the multimillionaires, so small that even the data can not be recorded in detail, and the postdoctoral fellows can't be counted, in 2018, there are only 200,000 people in the country, just calculate it, look at your academic qualifications, it's not bad.

Nowadays, people feel that they are a waste when they look at the marketing number poisonous chicken soup, and if they continue to look at it, they will really become a waste. What's even more ridiculous is that many people use this anxiety to spread the theory of the uselessness of reading, in this era young people's choices are indeed more diverse than before, reading is indeed not the only way out, but if you don't even have a basic education, and it is an ordinary family, no matter how many roads in the outside world, you don't even have the qualifications to choose, even in this era, going to school and reading is still the simplest, direct and cost-effective way for young people to rise, and practical learning is the light of the right way.