What is the division of responsibility between a straight car and a U turn car? Seek help from autho

First, although the traffic law stipulates that police cars can use sirens and sign lamps when performing emergency tasks; It is not restricted by the driving route, driving direction, driving speed and signal lights, and other vehicles and pedestrians should give way. However, this provision is for the use of sirens when performing urgent tasks. And it has to be safe to do, so I don't think the police car will meet these conditions.

Second, in traffic accidents, only for the purpose of collecting evidence, can the traffic management department of the public security organ detain the accident vehicle and motor vehicle driving license and issue a certificate of administrative compulsory measures. The period of seizure shall not exceed 30 days. If you have not impounded the vehicle, it does not belong to the situation that needs to be inspected and identified, and it stands to reason that the driver's license should not be detained.

No matter how you say that the traffic police force has not dealt with it in accordance with laws and regulations, it should be the police car that made a U-turn in violation of the law and is fully responsible. But everyone is a nest, don't say anything, hurry up and notify the insurance company to deal with it. If you really want to seek justice, you can complain to the police supervision department of the public security organ or the traffic management department of the public security at a higher level.

As long as it is proved that the police car was not performing emergency duties at that time, it can be disposed of as an ordinary vehicle.

Hello, is there a responsibility for the traffic police to make an accident determination for identification. However, China's laws stipulate that in the case of no liability, compulsory traffic insurance is also to be paid, but the amount is relatively low.

This requires an investigation by the traffic police to be able to determine the distribution of responsibility.

Summary. The determination of responsibility for traffic accidents shall be determined by the traffic management department on the basis of the inquest, inspection, and investigation of the traffic accident scene and the relevant inspection and appraisal conclusions.

Article 73 of the Road Traffic Safety Law stipulates that the traffic management department of the public security organ shall, according to the inquest, inspection and investigation of the traffic accident scene and the relevant inspection and appraisal conclusions, make a traffic accident identification certificate in a timely manner as evidence for handling the traffic accident. The traffic accident determination document shall clearly state the basic facts of the traffic accident, the causes and the responsibilities of the parties, and serve them on the parties.

Division of responsibility for collision between a straight car and a U-turn vehicle.

The determination of responsibility for traffic accidents shall be determined by the traffic management department on the basis of the inquest, inspection, and investigation of the traffic accident scene and the relevant inspection and appraisal conclusions. Article 73 of the Road Traffic Safety Law stipulates that the traffic management department of the public security organ shall, according to the inquest, inspection and investigation of the traffic accident scene and the relevant inspection and appraisal conclusions, make a traffic accident identification certificate in a timely manner as evidence for handling the traffic accident. The traffic accident determination document shall clearly state the basic facts of the traffic accident, the causes and the responsibilities of the parties, and serve them on the parties.

So whose responsibility is this?

The alarm needs to be determined by the traffic management department according to the traffic accident scene inquest, inspection, investigation and relevant inspection and appraisal conclusions.

Generally speaking, it is a side collision traffic accident formed by one side vehicle turning and the other party going straight, and the turning party bears all the responsibility for the accident, that is, the turning vehicle, and the U-turn vehicle should give way to the straight vehicle, and if a collision occurs, the turning vehicle is generally fully responsible.

1. In the case of a side collision traffic accident caused by one party's vehicle turning and the other party going straight, the turning party shall bear full responsibility for the accident;

2. In the event of a side collision traffic accident on a "D" shaped road, the party driving from one road to another road shall bear full responsibility for the accident;

3. In the event of a side collision traffic accident on the road crossed by the word "ten", both parties shall bear the same responsibility for the accident. Finally, if there is evidence to prove that the party is speeding, drunk driving, driving in violation of traffic signs, driving without a license, driving a vehicle that does not meet the safety technical requirements on the road, and other illegal acts that affect traffic safety, the party shall bear corresponding responsibility according to the force of their behavior on the occurrence of traffic accidents.

Turning and U-turning vehicles should go straight until they do not touch;

The U-turn car crashes into the straight car is a rush, just grab it, if there is a collision and scratch is the responsibility;

There are no speeding and violations on both sides, and if there is a collision and scratching, turning and U-turning, the vehicle is fully responsible or responsible;

Seeing the fast speed of the U-turn in front of you, you must emphasize, but it is difficult to define whether it is speeding, and it is said that he can be fully responsible, but there are two: 1He didn't speak, 2You just don't accept the blame, you have to work hard!

Dear, I'll send you the information you need, about 3 minutes! Please wait a moment and have a great day! Have a good mood every day ahead! 

According to the relevant laws and regulations of our country, the vehicle going straight hits the vehicle in front of the U-turn, which is a rear-end collision, and the vehicle behind is generally responsible for not keeping a safe distance. Article 43 of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China For motor vehicles driving in the same lane, the rear vehicle shall maintain a safe distance sufficient from the vehicle in front to take emergency braking measures. In any of the following circumstances, no overtaking is allowed:

1) The vehicle in front is making a left turn, making a U-turn, or overtaking; (2) There is a possibility of meeting with the opposite car; (3) The vehicle in front is a police car, fire truck, ambulance, or engineering rescue vehicle performing an emergency mission; (4) There are no overtaking conditions for passing through railway crossings, intersections, narrow bridges, curves, steep slopes, tunnels, pedestrian crossings, and sections with large traffic flow in urban areas.

If your questions have been answered, please click on the evaluation to give 5 little stars to like Oh If there are unanswered questions, you can leave a message or consult again, I hope it can help you I wish you a happy life! 

Look at the relationship between the other party. Once, I was driving straight and was hit by the female owner of a red sedan. My van.

The two heads collided. The collision posture is like the number 7. The traffic police came and judged each other to compensate for each other.

I was not convinced at the time. But it can't be helped. No money, no power, no power.

At that time, the billboard light on the left suddenly turned on in the evening, and I instantly looked at the light! Turn around and bump into it, whose responsibility is this!