How to talk about the proposition of the national examination, and the 600 word essay on the topic o

The 2017 national exam ended last month. The most competitive positions, tens of thousands of people to fight. Because a large number of people feel that being admitted to the civil service is equivalent to having an iron job bowl and worry-free food and clothing. This should be the reason why the national examination is so popular every year.

In my opinion, it is true that some outstanding talents can be selected through the national examination, but it is inevitable that some examination machines that are good at exams will get opportunities. The national examination only provides a platform for the performance after going to work, relying on personal ability. Some people have taken the national examination and been admitted to a good job, but they have been doing nothing all their lives and standing still, which is related to their work ability.

Under the supervision and advice of my parents, I also participated in this year's national examination. There were five or six empty seats in the morning exam room, and in the afternoon there were empty seats, and some people abandoned the exam. I don't know why they abandoned the test, maybe they felt that the test was too competitive and they were not sure, or maybe they didn't want to take the test after signing up.

I didn't prepare for this exam, I didn't review, and I didn't expect much from the results, just as an accumulation of experience. Maybe as I get older, I'll want a job as a stable and comfortable civil servant, but for now, I'm thinking about a job that I love.

In the eyes of most people, taking the national examination and being admitted to the civil service is a very powerful thing, but in my opinion, being admitted to the civil service is just an opportunity, and it does not mean that once and for all, going to work depends on a person's ability. At any time, we must not give up learning, only continuous learning, can we make progress and develop. The result of this year doesn't matter because I know I've been working towards my goals and I'm always on the road.

No, the interview questions will be different in each department.

The main body is still based on structured interviews, which are generally four questions, with comprehensive analysis, scenario simulation and emergency response questions as compulsory exams, and planning organization and speech, and interpersonal relationships as selective examinations. National tax is such a way of looking at.

In general, the national examination interview is 20 minutes, and the question is the way to read the questions.

To understand the material, the first thing is to understand what we need to look for. In other words, it is necessary to do a good job of reviewing the questions and understand what we need. And only then do you read the material.

Regarding reading materials, I agree with Hua Mujun's method, pay attention to the beginning and end paragraphs and sentences of the material, read the expression of opinions carefully, pay special attention to the expression of the connecting words, especially the expression after the transition and cohesion, etc., I remember about so much. Hope it helps.

It is recommended that it is best to learn systematically and practice more.

The most effective way to do this is to strengthen your reading yourself.

Introduce the method given to me by Brother Hua: When reading, I always take a pen and directly outline the central idea and key words, and mark the content of the outline accordingly, such as the meaning or measure that is highlighted in this sentence.

I take the mock test in the Buzhi public exam community every Saturday, and I feel very beneficial to help me read the problem-solving materials.

Hello: The difficulty of preparing for the exam is different.

The difficulty of the national examination and the provincial examination is not the same, and the two are naturally not at the same level, if the provincial examination is at the "CBA" level, then the national examination is at the "NBA" level; If the provincial examination is a "** rank", then the national examination is a "king rank"; If the provincial examination is an "elite mode", then the national examination is a "hell mode". The logic of the provincial examination is very simple, and the materials are presented clearly, but the national examination is not, and the materials will disrupt the logic; The way of thinking of the provincial examination is linear, very simple, and the argument of the national examination is curvilinear and scattered, which requires all-round and multi-angle thinking and a deeper level of thinking. These two differences are especially evident in composition.

If you still revise for the national exam at the level of the provincial exam, then it will be difficult for you to adapt to the national exam, and even fall short of the standard.

There are different types of exam preparation questions.

The provincial examination essay type is simple, most of them are inductive questions, implementation questions and essays, and there are few comprehensive analysis tests. But the national examination is different, the national examination likes to test the candidate's comprehensive analysis ability, the comprehensive analysis question is a compulsory question in the test papers of the past two years, and some test papers even have two comprehensive analysis, which will add up to 35 points! And every question is not simple, some of the comprehensive analysis questions are difficult to read, most of the candidates look at these materials completely confused, do not know what to do, as for the answer, there is no way to talk about it, this is not at the same level as the provincial examination.

Therefore, the preparation for the national examination should also focus on the preparation for the comprehensive analysis of the question type.

The material design is different.

The provincial examination materials are relatively simple, the whole material revolves around a question, and each material will mention the topic, but the national examination is not, the theme question type is not so obvious, and some materials are not even the same topic as other materials. The topics of the provincial examination materials are easy to understand and easy to obtain, but the materials of the national examination are very abstract and difficult to grasp.

In general, the national examination and the provincial examination have a certain connection, but there are also differences, if you want to better face the battle, you also need more targeted preparation, more targeted methods and skills.

From the perspective of organizational units, the national examination is organized by the Organization Department of the Communist Party of China, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, and the State Civil Service Bureau, and the provincial examination is organized by the Organization Department of the Provincial Party Committee, the Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security, and the Provincial Civil Service Bureau. From the perspective of geographical scope, the national examination is held nationwide, while the provincial examination is held within the province. From the perspective of examination time, the national examination is generally registered in mid-October of the previous year, and the examination is held at the end of November, and the provincial examination time is generally arranged by the provinces themselves.

From the point of view of the test location, candidates for the national examination can freely choose the test area, and candidates for the provincial examination need to take the test in the province where they are recruited. ，

The 2018 national examination is generally more difficult, and most of the candidates who have a large essay topic can't figure out their heads and can't grasp the real gist of the essay. But I don't know which aspect of the argument you are referring to more strictly? Does it mean that the teacher is grading the test papers?

This year's essay is all confused to write enough words, and the teacher's correction is also to see the main idea of the article, including arguments, arguments, and whether the argument is sufficient. As long as the article is complete, it will be above the basic score. Besides, if the correction is stricter, the low score is low for everyone, and it's the same, so there's no need to worry about this.

Now you can know the knowledge points to be tested from the perspective of the person who wrote the specific big essay, and the next time you understand the proposition ideas of the national examination, you will be more experienced in answering the questions. And this time, it's likely that you'll be a little higher than others and go ashore, isn't it?