Who has the information of Chamberlain, and Bill Russell detail .

Both of these men are great centers, and Russell is undoubtedly more powerful in terms of feats, known as the Lord of the Rings, and with 11 rings on his feet, no one can beat him. He was also the first player to become an MVP on defense, and he was the one who showed the world that defense is also important in basketball. He was the first player to win a three-time MVP and was voted the Most Valuable Player five times in his lifetime.

And Chamberlain only has 2 rings, although the MVP also has 4 times, but it is still not as good as Russell, so in terms of greatness, Russell is even greater. But when it comes to awesomeness (I personally think awesome is to describe ball skills), then Chamberlain is even better, he has scored 100, no one can break it so far, he also averaged more than 50 points per game in a single season this season (yes, it is an average per game, 1961-1962 season), and he is also the only player in the history of the league to score more than 4000 points in a single season. He was able to do almost anything on the offensive end, as some said he was selfish, and he became the assist leader (the only center assist leader in league history) in the 1967-1968 season.

He has the physical qualities of an alien and has grabbed 55 rebounds in a single game (unbeatable). After Chamberlain scored 100 points, Russell's own words, "I can't beat him out of 10," speaks for itself.

Celtic legend – Bill Russell.

Each has its own merits, the big handsome wins in the data, and Russell must win in the ring, and the Lord of the Rings is not a grace to blow.

Although they are all C, their main roles are different. One was the strongest spear of its time, and the other was the strongest shield.

Some centers also failed to grab 55 rebounds in five games, and Chamberlain actually achieved it in a confrontation with Russell, who scored a record 4,029 points in a single season in the 1961-1962 season, an average of 82 games per game.

Of course, Chamberlain, just look at the data, Russell's opponent Zhang Dashuai can't limit his play at all, but the teammates next to Russell are much better than Chamberlain.

Every superstar has his own characteristics and strengths, and a good player must also have a good team to play to the best of his ability.

Not a man of the times! There is no comparison, Russell has eleven championships!

Russell was just lucky, and Chamberlain was invincible.

Offensive Zhang Dashuai, defensive Russell, comprehensive Chamberlain.

I think Chamberlain liked to play more offense than defense.

I think Chamberlain is better.

Chamberlain, the Emperor of Basketball.

Russell and Chamberlain have played a total of 142 games in the NBA, with the Celtics winning 84 and Chamberlain's team winning 58. The Celtics are basically in an absolute advantage.

Specific data (there were no blocks, broken balls, etc. in that era):

Russell: Points, rebounds.

Chamberlain: Points, rebounds.

The two sides have met in the playoffs eight times (including two Finals), with the Celtics winning seven times, with their only defeat coming in the 1967 Eastern Conference Finals, where they were eliminated 4-1. Out of a total of 49 games played in the playoffs, the specific stats for 2 individuals are:

Russell: Points, rebounds.

Chamberlain: Points, rebounds.

Obviously, in individual confrontations, Chamberlain was at a clear advantage, while Russell's advantage was in the team. Even Russell himself once said that the best way to stop Chamberlain and his violent dunk is to lock him in the locker room.

Personally, I think that when it comes to which of these two people is better, everyone can have their own answer, but if Russell can beat Chamberlain, it must be in the game you play, or in your dreams. History has proven that a good team can prevent Chamberlain from winning the championship, but no one can beat Chamberlain.

The most convincing thing about achievement in the NBA is the ring.

Russell, as a talented defensive monster, won 11 championship rings in 13 years in his career, and deserved the "Lord of the Rings", which is an unprecedented feat, and I am afraid that there will be no one before. As a defensive interior player, he is the cornerstone of the Celtics, setting countless personal records and receiving numerous individual honors. In order to make up for his regret of not winning the MVP of the Finals, the league announced in 09 that the Finals trophy would be named "Bill."

Russell Cup", it can be seen that his status in the NBA is unmatched.

If Russell is the strongest shield, then Chamberlain is the sharpest spear. On the court, with his superior physical fitness, he uncontrollably destroyed the opponent's basket and left a string of regrets in the NBA history books with a staggering score. The alliance has also had to change the rules again and again due to his excessive attack power.

However, in the early part of his career, he was in the same East as Russell, and he was the "uncrowned king", winning only one of his eight meetings and winning the championship, until he later committed to the Lakers and weakened his personal brilliance before getting his second ring at the end of his career.

Overall, it was Russell who achieved more.

Chamberlain, personal preference, hehe.

Originally, Chamberlain's historical status is indeed higher than Russell's.