Is it true that the fundamental problem of philosophy is the dialectical relationship between matter

Updated on culture 2024-03-29
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    This statement is inconsistent and incorrect. Because: 1, the fundamental problem of philosophy refers to the question of the relationship between matter and consciousness (being and thinking).

    If the above point of view is said to be a "dialectical relationship", then it is equivalent to having already made a decision on the basic problem of philosophy, and therefore it is not a "basic problem". 2. The word "dialectic" itself is a fundamental question. However, there must be a fundamental question – the relationship between existence and thinking (matter and consciousness) – before this question can be answered in a "dialectical" way.

    3. The latter "dialectical relationship" in the above view is inconsistent and therefore wrong with regard to the fundamental problem of philosophy, the relationship between matter and consciousness, rather than the basic problem of philosophy itself.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Wrong. The basic question of philosophy is the question of thinking and the question of the question, too.

    The Problem of Matter and Consciousness.

    There are two sides to the problem. First, there is the question of who is the origin of the world, matter or consciousness, and according to different differences, materialism and idealism can be distinguished. Second, there is the question of whether thinking and being are identical, and according to the differences, agnosticism and agnosticism can be distinguished.

    The fundamental problem of philosophy is not the dialectical relationship between matter and consciousness, which is not.

    It means that matter and consciousness do not have a dialectical relationship.

    If you don't understand, please ask.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The philosophical question that has plagued people for thousands of years has finally been solved, consciousness is matter?

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The basic problem of philosophy is the relationship between thinking and being, that is, the relationship between consciousness and matter;

    Therefore, this question is incorrect

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    a 1.Question Analysis: The question of the relationship between matter and consciousness is the basic issue of philosophy, and it is a necessary question that cannot be avoided by all philosophies.

    Differences in the treatment of this issue determine the basic nature and direction of various philosophies, and determine their impact on other philosophical issues. The question of which is the primacy of matter and consciousness is the only criterion for distinguishing materialism from idealism, a is true; BCD does not match the title.

    2.Lenin noted: "Of course, even the opposition between matter and consciousness has absolute meaning only in a very limited context, and here it has absolute meaning only in the context of the fundamental question of epistemology of recognizing what is first and what is second."

    Beyond that, this opposition is undoubtedly relative. ”

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Thinking and being or the relationship between spirit and matter.

    Thinking and being are the two highest categories of philosophy, and the relationship between thinking and being reflects the most fundamental aspect of man's relationship with the world. Therefore, the relationship between thinking and being is a problem that cannot be avoided by any philosophical system, and must be made in its own way. Moreover, the establishment of any philosophical system should also take the solution of other philosophical problems as the starting point and the center.

    There are two salient aspects to the problem of the relationship between thinking and being. Among them, the question of what is primordial between thinking and being, spirit and matter, that is, what is primacy, is the most important aspect. Was the real world created by the mind or spirit, or was it always self-existing?

    Is the essence and foundation of the world spiritual or material? These questions belong to ontological questions in the history of philosophy, which study the question of the existence and nature of the world itself. The primacy of matter and spirit is the basis and fundamental starting point for the establishment of the theoretical system of all philosophies, which stipulates the basic nature of philosophy and the basic direction for solving all philosophical problems.

    Therefore, Engels took the difference between thinking and the question of what is the primacy of existence as the only criterion for dividing the two basic philosophical schools of materialism and idealism.

    There is another aspect of the relationship between thinking and being, that is, the question of whether thinking and existence are identical, and whether the world can be understood by people, and whether people's thinking can correctly reflect the real world. This belongs to the realm of epistemology in the history of philosophy, and it deals with the nature of knowledge, the possibility of knowledge, and its realization. The vast majority of philosophers throughout history have affirmed this question either from a materialist standpoint or from an absolute idealist standpoint.

    But there are also philosophers who deny the possibility of knowing the world, or deny the possibility of knowing the world thoroughly. The history of philosophy refers to them as agnostics or skeptics.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The fundamental question of philosophy is that the question of who is the primordial of matter and consciousness is wrong.

    1. The basic problem of philosophy is the relationship between thinking and existence. To put it simply, it is a question of the relationship between consciousness and matter. It has two aspects:

    1. The question of which is the primacy of thinking and existence, and the difference between this question is the only criterion for dividing materialism and idealism.

    2. The question of whether there is identity between thinking and existence, that is, whether thinking can correctly understand the existing problems.

    2. Why is the question of the relationship between thinking and being a fundamental problem in philosophy?

    The problem of the relationship between thinking and existence is the basic problem that people first encounter and cannot avoid in their life and practical activities. The activities engaged in by human beings mainly boil down to two categories, one is to understand the world, and the other is to transform the world. Whether we understand the world or transform the world, in the final analysis, we must solve a common problem, that is, the problem of the relationship between thinking and being.

    The question of the relationship between thinking and existence is a question that cannot be avoided and necessary by all philosophies. The question of the relationship between thinking and Shoulu runs through the whole development of philosophy, and the difference in this issue determines the basic nature and direction of various philosophies, as well as other philosophical issues.

    3. Expand the information

    Philosophy is essentially the rational activity of people to understand people and people to understand people, philosophy is an undergraduate major in ordinary colleges and universities, it is a philosophy major, the basic study period is four years, and a bachelor's degree in philosophy is awarded. Philosophy is based on specific sciences, takes the universal laws of the whole world as the object of study, and provides theoretical guidance for specific disciplines.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The essence of the world is matter, matter determines consciousness, and consciousness is a reflection of objective existence. We are required to persist in proceeding from reality in everything we do and seeking truth from facts.

    Consciousness has an active effect on matter:

    1. Consciousness activities are purposeful and planned, and people can actively understand the world. Human consciousness can not only reflect the external phenomena of things, but also grasp the essence and laws of things.

    Consciousness has a counter-effect on matter, the correct consciousness pushes things to develop, and the wrong consciousness hinders the development of things. This requires us to attach importance to spiritual strength, consciously establish a correct ideological consciousness, and overcome erroneous ideological awareness.

    2. People can actively transform the world. Consciousness has a guiding role in transforming the objective world. Consciousness has a role in regulating and controlling the physiological activities of the human body. The high consciousness inspires people to forge ahead, and the low consciousness makes people depressed.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Matter is primary, and consciousness is the product of the long-term development of matter. As for the dialectical relationship between the two, we can understand one or two by looking at the history of the long struggle between materialism and idealism.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Matter determines consciousness, and matter is independent, rooted, and derived from consciousness.

    Consciousness has a reaction to matter, and consciousness is a product of matter.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    "The fundamental problem of philosophy is the question of the dialectical relationship between thinking and being, or between consciousness and matter", this sentence is unscientific. It is correct to say that the fundamental problem of philosophy is the question of the relationship between thinking and being, or between consciousness and matter. (Note that the word "dialectic" has been deleted here.)

    Because: 1. The question of the relationship between thinking and existence, or between consciousness and matter, is not only a question that all philosophies must encounter, but also a question that all philosophies must answer first. The nature of philosophy is different if one answers the question of which is the primordial matter, and who determines who is the most important aspect of the fundamental question of philosophy. It is because materialism and idealism give diametrically opposed answers that they become two fundamentally opposed worldviews.

    Therefore, the question of the relationship between thinking and being, or between consciousness and matter, becomes a fundamental question of philosophy.

    2. The relationship between consciousness and matter is only one aspect of the dialectical relationship between consciousness and matter, that is, which is the origin of matter and consciousness, and who determines who determines whom. In addition to the content of the dialectical relationship between consciousness and matter, it also includes the content of consciousness's active role in matter. It can be seen that the relationship between consciousness and matter and the dialectical relationship between consciousness and matter are different in content.

    The basic problem of philosophy refers to the relationship between consciousness and matter, not to the dialectical relationship between the two. Therefore, the statement of the title is unscientific.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    There is no problem in saying this, and there is another, more comprehensive formulation of the fundamental problems of philosophy, which is this:

    1. The relationship between thinking and being.

    2. The relationship between subject and object.

    3. The relationship between practice and understanding.

    I wish you all good luck and success!

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    No, the basic question of philosophy refers to the question of the relationship between thinking and being, or the relationship between consciousness and matter, which contains two aspects: what is the origin of the world, and whether the two are identical.

    The dialectical relationship between matter and consciousness includes the fact that matter determines consciousness, and at the same time, consciousness has an active reaction to matter, which is the basic viewpoint of dialectical materialism.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    As far as the mainstream Chinese philosophical view is concerned, it is true.

    But to study philosophy, I still read the original works of foreign masters.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    This statement is not true. We regard the basic problem of philosophy as the relationship between thinking and existence, and the question of the "dialectical" relationship between the existence of thinking cannot be said to be the problem of the "dialectical" relationship between matter and consciousness

    And the question of the relationship between thinking and being (or the question of the relationship between matter and consciousness) includes:

    1. What is the primary nature, and 2. Whether the two are identical.

    The "dialectical" relationship between matter and consciousness: matter determines consciousness, and consciousness has an effective reaction to matter.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    B test question analysis: The basic problem of philosophy can be said to be the relationship between thinking and existence, or it can be said to be the relationship between matter and consciousness, but the word "dialectic" cannot be added before the relationship, because in this way, the extension will be narrowed. So the answer is b.

    Comments: This is a definite conceptual question, as long as it is memorized accurately, the basic problem of philosophy is the relationship between thinking and being, here "thinking and being" can be replaced with "matter and consciousness", and the others can no longer be changed.

Related questions
2 answers2024-03-29

There are the following accounting problems in the bankruptcy liquidation of enterprises:1how to determine the authenticity and accuracy of the list of debts and assets; 2. >>>More

7 answers2024-03-29

Mine is a 2000 model.

It should be about the same. >>>More

7 answers2024-03-29

This is a dangerous idea! It is absolutely impossible to think that the majors of Peking University should all be good! Why don't you want so many schools in the country? >>>More

32 answers2024-03-29

The ego can only be self-proved, i think, therefore i am

Idealism is also logically correct. >>>More

12 answers2024-03-29

1. A philosopher once said: If God holds all the truth of this world in his left hand and the eternal pursuit of truth in his right hand, and then lets me choose, then I will choose my right hand without hesitation, and then say to him, "Give me eternal pursuit, because the truth of the world belongs to you alone!" ” >>>More