I think about it very much, the difference between the Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the Romance

I'll take care of LZ's questions one by one.

First, the first and last question.

As for the degree of respect for historical facts in Chen Shou's "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms", I don't think I should make a conclusion, since it can be called the first four histories together with the "Records of the Historians", "Book of Han" and "Book of the Later Han", the authenticity of its content is credible.

Therefore, I think that the historical facts recorded in the "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms" should be credible, but its shortcomings are: first, it was influenced by the politics of the time, and it was dominated by "respecting Wei", which would somewhat cover up some history that was unfavorable to Wei and Jin, that is, there were fewer negative materials for Wei. Second, due to the lack of historical materials, the content of Shu is somewhat thin, and I believe that there are many historical events of Shu that have not been included, of course, the content of Wu should also be so.

When we look at the history of the turbulent era of the Three Kingdoms, it seems that we should look at it more comprehensively, and "respect Wei" or "respect Liu" are our personal family words.

And then there's the first.

Second, the third question.

As for Guan Yu and Zhuge Liang, they were deified in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and even sometimes Hou deified a little too much, Zhuge Liang was deified as "Unknown Prophet", and Guan Yu was deified as "loyalty" and "righteousness".

Comparable to Zhuge Liang's Longzhong pair is Lu Su's advice to Sun Quan. His estimation of the situation and the measures he proposed were quite similar to Zhuge Liang's. But he thinks:

Today's Cao Cao can be compared to Xiang Yu, why does the general have to be Huan and Wenhu? "That is, you can't maintain the Han family; Then he proposed some measures, but the purpose was "to establish the emperor in order to seek the world, and this ancestor is also the cause." "It is obviously different from Zhuge Liang's position.

From an orthodox standpoint, Lu Su is as rebellious as Cao Cao, so he can only try his best to scandalize him in **.

On the whole, the author created "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" under the influence of strong orthodoxy. In this way, the question of why Guan Yu and Zhuge Liang should be deified can be explained.

Regarding the theme of "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", there are many different opinions, such as respecting Liu and degrading Cao, praising unification, praising loyalty, and maintaining orthodoxy. There are also many experts and scholars who oppose orthodoxy. In all fairness, orthodoxy did play a very important role in the creation of this **, and the infinite praise of Guan Yu and Zhuge Liang is a manifestation of this influence.

Therefore, under this influence, future generations naturally regard Guan Yu as the embodiment of justice, and his image surpasses Yue Fei in the hearts of future generations.

typed so many words, it should be a complete question of the landlord.

Question, if LZ is satisfied, I hope to add a little more points.

Chen Shou's father died at the hands of Zhuge Liang (implicated in the loss of the street pavilion by Ma Tan), but what is Chen Shou's evaluation of Zhuge Liang? Therefore, Chen Shou's words should be objective and fair. Of course, Chen Shou is a family after all, and it is inevitable that there will be limitations.

But the flaws are not hidden, which is also one of the reasons for the success of the Three Kingdoms.

Use literati such as Pang Tong, Zhou Yu, and Lu Su to bring out the gods of Zhuge Liang. Because Guan Gong's faithfulness is well known to the world. No.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a history book, and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a **, relatively speaking, the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is more credible than the Romance of the Three Kingdoms.

The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a literary work that combines historical facts and fiction and is easy to understand, while the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a historiographical work that describes history, and few people know about it.

The storylines they play are different. The controversy is that history is the same, the background is the same, and similar people do things differently.

The biggest difference between the Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is that the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is closer to history, while the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is adapted by the author based on history.