How to implement the separation of government and enterprises? What year was the separation of gover

Legal analysis: In October 1992, the 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of China established a socialist market economy system, proposing to "separate the government from the enterprise, and gradually expand the autonomy of enterprises in production and operation". In this context, in 1993, the Ministry of Light Industry was abolished through institutional reform and the China Light Industry Association was established.

Legal basis: Article 6 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China The basis of the socialist economic system of the People's Republic of China is the socialist public ownership of the means of production, that is, the ownership of the whole people and the collective ownership of the working masses. The socialist system of high public ownership or system eliminates the exploitation of man, and implements the principle of distribution according to the ability of each according to his ability.

In the initial stage of socialism, the state adhered to the basic economic system with public ownership as the mainstay and the common development of economies under various forms of ownership, and adhered to the distribution system in which distribution according to work was the mainstay and various modes of distribution were combined.

Separation of government and enterprise: The functions of the enterprise are separated from those of the enterprise. The separation of government administration from enterprise administration shows the correct division of the respective powers of state power organs and economic organizations at all levels, and the correct handling of the relationship between the state and enterprises.

The separation of government administration from enterprise management was proposed at the beginning of the reform, but it has not yet achieved the envisaged goal. In fact, the relationship between government and enterprises has always been in a state of contradiction: on the one hand, for the sake of maintaining and increasing the value of state-owned assets, ** still implements administrative intervention in enterprises for various reasons and in various identities, and as a result, the phenomenon of indistinguishable government and enterprises is still very common; On the other hand, as a representative of the ownership of state-owned assets, limited by information, interests, manpower and other factors, and did not perform the owner's responsibilities well, a considerable part of the state-owned assets are out of control, the phenomenon of "owner absence" and "insider control" is serious, and a large number of state-owned assets are lost.

Legal analysis: ** is an administrative body established under the system of people's congresses, exercising state power and exercising public management; Enterprises are profit-making organizations under the socialist market economy system, and they are market-competitive and profitable. There is a fundamental difference between the enterprise and the enterprise in terms of nature, function and work purpose, so it is impossible to integrate government and enterprise.

There have been precedents for the integration of government and enterprises, such as the Hanyang Iron Works in Zhangzhidong and Sheng Xuanhuai's Steamship China Merchants Bureau, which are characterized by the inclusion of enterprise operations in the financial category, the financial support of direct financing, and the direct distribution of enterprise products and profits. These characteristics had a certain positive effect in the initial period of modern industry, and led to the development of modern industry. It has certain limitations of the times, such as enterprises are not suitable for the market economy and are not competitive; Enterprises refer to jujube production out of market regulation; Enterprises usurp to replace ** in exercising some administrative functions; Enterprise influence** policy orientation; It is not conducive to the supervision and management of enterprises; Poor business management can easily lead to serious financial burdens, and so on.

Legal basis: Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China Article 4: People's courts independently exercise adjudication power over administrative cases in accordance with law, and are not to be interfered with by administrative organs, social groups, or individuals.

The people's courts are to set up administrative divisions to hear administrative cases.

The separation of government and enterprise means that the state separates the government from the enterprise, and no longer interferes in the operation and decision-making of the enterprise.

The earliest prototype of this reform can be traced back to the 1984 "Decision on Reforming the Economic System," which put forward a series of important reform measures, such as "separating government from enterprises, separating management from management, and reforming the company system." The official implementation of the separation of government and enterprises can be traced back to December 9, 1998 after the promulgation of the "Measures of the People's Republic of China for the Separation of ** and Enterprises". The measures stipulate that enterprises must withdraw from the economic field and shall not interfere with the operation and decision-making of enterprises, and at the same time, enterprises must operate in accordance with the law and independently implement business decisions.

The main purpose of separating government from enterprise is to separate the government from the enterprise, so as to reduce the burden of the enterprise, reduce the intervention of the enterprise in the operation of the enterprise, and at the same time allow the enterprise to run itself independently and improve the efficiency and competitiveness of the enterprise. The separation of government administration from enterprise management has also brought about great changes in the business model of state-owned enterprises, and state-owned enterprises have gradually introduced modern enterprise systems such as market-oriented operation, corporate management, substitution of rewards for reduction, and self-responsibility for profits and losses, moving toward a more healthy, standardized, and transparent direction.

In general, the reform of separating government from enterprise is a major reform in the course of China's economic reform, which not only accelerates the economic development of the bridge, but also helps the transformation and upgrading of enterprises, and promotes the gradual improvement of China's economic system. In the future, the reform of separating government from enterprise management will continue to deepen, and new development directions will be explored to further promote the sustainable development of China's economy.

Legal analysis: The separation of government and enterprises (state-owned enterprises and enterprises) is the embodiment of China's development of market economy. The separation of government and enterprise is to no longer really take over the operation of enterprises, give enterprises full autonomy to operate, and enterprises no longer rely on enterprises to protect.

This is conducive to putting enterprises in the market, accepting the test of market competition, improving their production efficiency, better contributing to the country, and also reducing the burden of the first department.

Legal basis: "Regulations on the Establishment and Establishment of Local People's Institutions at All Levels".

Article 9: The establishment, revocation, merger or change of specifications and names of local people's administrative bodies at all levels shall be proposed by the people's government at the same level, and after being reviewed by the people's organization at the next higher level, it shall be submitted to the people's government at the next higher level for approval; Among them, the establishment, revocation or merger of local people's administrative bodies at or above the county level shall also be reported to the Standing Committee of the people's congress at the corresponding level for the record in accordance with law.

Article 10: Where the responsibilities of local people's administrative bodies at all levels are the same or similar, in principle, an administrative body shall assume the responsibilities of jujubes. Where there are objections between administrative bodies on the division of duties, they shall take the initiative to resolve them through consultation. where consensus is reached, it shall be reported to the people's ** establishment and management organ at the same level for the record; Where there is disagreement through consultation, it shall be submitted to the people's ** establishment management organ at the same level to submit a coordination opinion, and the establishment management organ shall report to the people's ** at the same level for a decision.

Article 11: The establishment of deliberative and coordinating bodies by local people** at all levels shall be strictly controlled; Where functions can be assigned to an existing body, or where the problem can be resolved through coordination by an existing body, a separate deliberative and coordinating body is not to be established. Deliberative and coordinating bodies established for the purpose of handling a specific task within a certain period of time shall clearly stipulate the conditions and time limits for their revocation.

Article 12: The deliberative and coordinating bodies of the local people at or above the county level do not set up separate offices, and the specific work is undertaken by the relevant administrative bodies.

13th local people's administrative organs at all levels in accordance with the needs of the work and the principle of leanness, the establishment of necessary internal institutions. The establishment, revocation, merger or change of specifications and names of the internal organs of local people's administrative bodies at or above the county level shall be submitted by the administrative body to the people's administrative organs at the same level and the establishment and management organs of the Huai Demolition Institutions for examination and approval.