The revelation of Gulliver s Travels, the inspiration of Gulliver s Travels to our lives

Brave and fearless, develop a persistent and intelligent character.

Tell us to move forward.

Have a heart to explore, and not give up easily in the face of challenges.

Maintain an optimistic mindset and look at life positively.

Gulliver was an ordinary Englishman in the 18th century, and he was also an unusual Robinson. Gulliver is arrogant and self-righteous, and even hates and despises the captain who saved him from danger. People should be humble and learn to be grateful.

Gulliver's Travels "Wisdom Gulliver" Wisdom Plume Like the Country Main Content: Gulliver was banished to the "Wisdom Country". Here the horses are the rational inhabitants and rulers of the country.

And "Lehu" (Yahu, Yehu, Yehu, Yehu, and other names are a matter of translation) are animals raised and enslaved by horses.

Gulliver's demeanor is talking"Wisdom Horse"Ma Min seems to be a rational one"Lehu"。Influenced by the virtues of "Wisdom Horse", Gulliver is bent on staying in the country of "Wisdom Horse". However, the "Hui Qiu" spine country decided to eliminate the Lehu there.

So Gulliver's wish could not be fulfilled.

In desperation, Gulliver had no choice but to leave the country in a small boat and return home. Gulliver, with a yearning for the "Wise Country", has been friends with horses all his life, and has rejected the world, determined not to join others. The contrast between Huima and Lehu highlights the preciousness of the humanity of reason, kindness, and friendship, and the ugliness of Kei Ginno's greed, trustlessness, and jealousy.

Theme idea. Looking at all the plots of **, "Gulliver's Travels" has a clear political leaning. Its critical edge focused on attacking parliamentary politics and reactionary religious forces in Britain at the time.

**Through Gulliver's adventures in Lilliput, Brobdingnag (Lord), Lepita (Flying Island) and Wisdom Horse, it reflects some contradictions in British society in the first half of the 18th century, exposing and criticizing the corruption and crime of the British ruling class and the frenzied plundering and cruel exploitation of British capitalism in the period of primitive capitalist accumulation.

Gulliver's Travels expresses the author's ideas in a more perfect art form. The author uses rich satirical techniques and bizarre plots of fictional fantasy to profoundly dissect the social reality of Britain at that time. The work fuses reality and fantasy together, contrasts the two, and uses the contrast between fiction and reality to perfect the artistic effect of satire, which has a strong appeal.

I was deeply attracted by the bizarre stories of the kingdom of adults and the kingdom of Lilliputians in the travelogue, but the story that impressed me the most was the story of Gulliver's voyage to North America in 1710, where he met the king of Huiyin on a desert island and met the king of Huiin, who had the virtues of kindness and honesty. There are no words for "lying" and "deceiving" in the language of Hui Yinguo, and people do not understand what they mean. They don't know what "doubt" is and what "distrust" is.

In their kingdom, everything is real and transparent.

I envy Gulliver for having the privilege of coming to the land of Huiyin, ** is the ideal situation we pursue and aspire to, where you don't need to worry about the truth or falsehood of other people's words. In the real world, some people use rhetoric to defraud others of their hard-earned money; child abduction and trafficking for profit; Some even abandon their biological parents for the sake of money......It is no wonder that our teachers and elders have taught us to be vigilant and be careful of being deceived.

I also hope that one day our society will be like Hui Yinguo, where there will be no doubt in the eyes of children, and education and reality will be unified. I am willing to work hard for this, and I also hope that everyone will work together, starting from me and from my side, so that this society will be more sincere and less hypocritical.

It is a mockery of the two rival political parties in Britain and an allusion to the perennial war between Britain and France at the time.