In the face of more and more professional counterfeiters, how can supermarkets survive

The latest legal provisions refer to the provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China on professional anti-counterfeiters in supermarkets. According to the law, supermarket professional counterfeiters must strictly abide by the principle of fair competition, and must not use false means or methods to attack competitors, and must not induce or deceive consumers into making purchases. At the same time, supermarket professional anti-counterfeiters should also protect trade secrets, and must not leak trade secrets or steal business information from competitors.

In addition, the law stipulates that professional anti-counterfeiters in Chaoliang Group City Jing Li Tang must communicate and coordinate with relevant departments when carrying out anti-counterfeiting behaviors, abide by legal procedures, and shall not take unauthorized actions to damage the legitimate rights and interests of others. At the same time, supermarket professional anti-counterfeiters must comply with relevant industry norms and standards, such as accurately labeling commodity information and standards.

In short, the latest legal provisions are designed to protect the interests of consumers and promote fair competition, while also requiring professional anti-counterfeiters in supermarkets to comply with legal norms and industry standards to ensure the healthy and orderly operation of the entire market.

For the sake of money, there are more and more profiteers in society, and I am more supportive of professional anti-counterfeiters. However, for some professional anti-counterfeiters, some businesses will also be targeted when cracking down on counterfeiting, and not every business will become a profiteer. When more and more people are doing business, in order to be able to run their business for a longer time, they have to be a serious businessman.

Moreover, when selling things, it will also target the quality of the goods, in order to be able to control the quality and drive a large number of consumers to buy goods. <>

There will be good people and bad people in each grinding industry, and for some professional counterfeiters, in the process of cracking down on counterfeiting, it may also hurt the innocent. Many of them have become accustomed to selling their produce online, and for some of the merchants who sell their produce, it is to be able to sell what they produce and sell further afield. Let everyone be able to taste some local specialties, but because the goods are self-produced and sold, they have not reached the health license certificate at all, and some professional counterfeiters will start with it.

If it is a food hygiene and safety issue, everyone should be fair and do business with a conscience in order to make their business better. There are many people who are in the food industry, and the boss is afraid to eat things, but they sell dirty things to others and let others eat them. There are also many people for such businesses, and for businesses, they should also realize that they must pay attention to integrity in doing business.

In particular, food safety issues should be put in the first place, and do not wait for others to find out before correcting them, then their own business will also be seriously affected. <>

For professional slapsticks, it is artificial to protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, and to help consumers recognize what can be purchased and what is not worth buying. Nowadays, there are a lot of professional counterfeiters on the Internet, and the goods sold have become dazzling, and some contemporary young people are very lazy. When making dumplings, I will also buy dumpling artifacts directly from the Internet, and when I use the dumpling artifacts used by professional anti-counterfeiters, I found that they are all chicken rib products.

Support, with someone to crack down on counterfeiting, in order to have a deterrent effect on counterfeit and shoddy product manufacturers. Otherwise, there are more and more fakes, and it is becoming more and more difficult to be a businessman.

It is still supported, and now some leaky merchants often make illegal profits in order to obtain profits, so that consumers fall into more and more pits to return to the surplus, we should encourage the whole people to be professional anti-counterfeiters.

I am more supportive, because I feel that this kind of anti-counterfeiter can give those profiteers a little vigilance, and can ensure the safety of our property.

First, improve your own system. Reduce the probability of problems.

Second, contact more with relevant law enforcement agencies to establish a good relationship. The main thing is the third of the industrial and commercial quality supervision and drug supervision, to minimize or refuse compensation, and to increase the cost of professional anti-counterfeiters.

Don't always tolerate them, rather be fined than pay less, so as to reduce the probability of them coming, and fines and compensation are separated. Compensation is mediation, and if you don't obey mediation, let them sue whether you accept mediation or not, fines are a necessary procedure.

Believe me, law enforcement agencies are more annoying than you professional anti-counterfeiters, and law enforcement agencies are reluctant to support some professional crackdowns that specialize in exploiting legal loopholes.

Even if you don't fake it, you won't come to fight fakes.

Legal subjectivity: The counterfeiter sued the supermarket, and was awarded compensation for malicious fake fighting On October 10, 2015, Li purchased ** brand salted butter in the supermarket. "One of them was so old that I picked it up and saw that it was expired.

The butter was manufactured on September 2, 2014 and has a shelf life of September 2, 2015. For this reason, Li sued for a refund of the price and compensation of 1,000 yuan in accordance with the provisions of the Food Safety Law. The ** person also claimed that the surveillance video showed that the plaintiff did not enter through the anti-theft entrance, but went around five or six meters away and entered through another entrance without an anti-theft device.

It can also be inferred from this that the butter is self-entrained, and the detour is to avoid the magnetic stripe alarm on it. It can be seen from ** that Li is holding a piece of ** butter to the cash register, and the complete shopping receipt is stamped with red letters above the "Senling Roll has confirmed that the goods have not passed the shelf life Sun Palace Parkson when shopping", and there is an anti-theft magnetic stripe on the side of the outer packaging of the butter. On March 7, the court pronounced the verdict on the spot after the trial.

The judge upheld Li's claim for 1,000 yuan. However, Li's act of cutting off some of the receipts is tampering with evidence, so Li was fined 3,000 yuan. Merchants should warn consumers to abide by the law and abide by the rules to protect their rights.

According to the relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Law, consumers who submitted tampered evidence to the court in the litigation concealed the facts of the relevant case, which is an act of making false statements and dishonest litigation to the court, and it is reported that a maximum fine of 100,000 yuan can be imposed. The court also said that some professional counterfeiters may have the phenomenon of "fake fighting", and it is very difficult for merchants to prove that the goods are not sold by them. Therefore, the judge reminded businesses to strengthen their warning obligations and improve technical means to retain evidence, so as to better protect their rights and interests in litigation.

If the supermarket encounters a professional anti-counterfeiter, it is first necessary to carefully check whether the fake information provided by the professional anti-counterfeiter is true and whether there are fabricated ingredients. If the facts are completely true, and it is indeed due to the management problems of the supermarket that the fake goods flow into the supermarket, then you must bear the corresponding responsibility. It is necessary to negotiate with the counterfeiter for compensation, so as not to expand the matter and avoid affecting the reputation of the supermarket.

After the incident has passed, the discipline of the supermarket will be strictly enforced, and the relevant responsibilities will be punished to prevent such things from happening again.

If the information provided by the professional anti-counterfeiter is fabricated and suspected of deliberately extorting the supermarket, you can choose to call the police and let ** come forward to deal with it. The supermarket will do a good job of assisting in the investigation.

First, improve your own system. Reduce the probability of problems.

Second, contact more with relevant law enforcement agencies to establish a good relationship. It is mainly industrial and commercial quality supervision and drug supervision.

Third, minimize or refuse compensation to increase the cost of professional anti-counterfeiters.

Don't always tolerate them, and would rather be punished than pay less, so as to reduce the probability of them coming.

In addition, fines and compensation are separated. Reparations are mediation, and if you disobey mediation, let them sue to go.

Whether you accept mediation or not, fines are a necessary procedure.

Believe me, law enforcement is more annoying than you are professional anti-counterfeiters, establish a good coordination mechanism.

Law enforcement is reluctant to support professional crackdowns that exploit loopholes in the law.