Which is the hardest Go, chess or chess?

Nie Weiping played against Kobayashi Koichi in the first Sino-Japanese Ring Match, and the national team helped to support him, and after studying countless Kobayashi Koichi's chess, he came to a conclusion that Kobayashi had the worst winning rate when he played against Diagonal Star. So when Nie Weiping played chess with Kobayashi Guang, he played a diagonal star. The second China-Japan Ring Match against Masaki Takemiya, everyone knows that Masaki Takemiya likes cosmic flows, so Nie Weiping started with the early mid-abdomen and did not let the cosmic flow form.

However, all of Takemiya Masaki's opponents are doing this, and Takemiya's personal style is too distinct) Ma Xiaochun was competing with Kobayashi Koichi for the Fujitsu Cup championship, and placed a land acquisition formula that everyone thought was a little loss, but Ma Xiaochun was very proud, he said that Kobayashi Koichi was not good at using external potential, although he lost here, but let Kobayashi Koyi enter the mode that he was not good at, Ma Xiaochun felt cheap. Therefore, Go can be dominated by the opponent. However, these are all old coming-of-age events from 20 years ago.

In the past ten years, Go has been popular in layout routines, up to a popular layout, eighty percent of the game black chess is all this layout, this layout contains countless flying knives, until all the knife changes are exhausted, and then the chess world began to study the second popular layout, Kobayashi flow, China flow, mini China flow, I have seen vomit. Therefore, modern Go is based on itself, especially black. However, all of the above only represent professional Go.

As an amateur chess player, I would like to say that you can play however you like, especially the layout, as long as you are above the fourth line, you can throw it around. Lay out the weird layouts I've seen or seen. Deforming the Chinese stream, the Chinese stream does not occupy the side, placed in the middle of the belly, it has a chess effect on low-level chess players, and it can also scare high-level chess players, and the layout will not lag behind.

First of all, it should be clear that in any competitive event, its competition is diversified and includes many aspects, not only the performance on the chessboard, the track and the court, but also the mutual research and analysis off the court, the design of the playing style and other factors are also part of the competition. So it's safe to say that it's a very common strategy to take different moves (not just for the first move, but also for any change of move) in the face of different opponents. Let's start with the theory.

The beginning of chess is roughly divided into two types: open and closed, and then subdivided into various variations, and each player has a different style of play and is naturally different. Some players are good at open and close battles, some are good at one-hit kills with tactical combinations, and some have solid late-game endgame skills. Before playing a game, a player will definitely understand and analyze his opponent, and then try to use his best style of play to overcome the opponent's weakest link, and then the opponent will do the same.

This is also the highest charm of gambling. <>

The opponent is a rookie. Put down the game and find someone to play cards to ......The next day, just follow your own style.

2.The opponent's level is much higher than mine. If I hold white, I will rush to e4, and I will try to steer the situation towards the defense ......of ancient India or the defense of Sicilian, and turn the situation into an attack at the beginning of the game, and strive to have an advantage in momentum, anyway, it is good to scare him twice if I don't win

3.The opponent is good at attacking. Open the center to prevent a closed situation from appearing and then defend, induce the opponent to attack, and wait for the opportunity to find the weak point to draw. (That's what I'm best at).

4.The opponent is good at defense. That's probably a draw......I'm okay with offense, but I'm not good at offense and defense.

5.The opponent is good at the endgame. If I don't redeem it, I won't redeem it, and I'll be angry with you.

Chinese Chess. Compared to chessI think Chinese chess is more difficult.

1.Chinese chess is more complex and the layout is more flexible;

2.Chinese chess has 90 squares, while chess has only 64 squares, which means that Chinese chess is more difficult;

3.The rules of chess are more complex and not as simple as Chinese chess, and it is more difficult to understand chess in this regard.

Board games are very important tools for human beings to develop their intelligence, such as Zen, and people who generally like to play chess have the logical thinking ability.

More and more children are also sent by their parents to learn to play chess, the purpose is to develop their intelligence, but many parents are in a predicament, and how to choose between Chinese chess and chess has become the focus of their attention. I also know a lot about chess, I think I should learn Chinese chess, chess and Chinese chess are good intellectual games, Chinese chess is more difficult than chess, the trend is more complex, the layout is more flexible, and there are more people learning Chinese chess.

1. There are more Chinese chess squares than chess

In board games, everyone must understand that the more squares you have, the more flexible and difficult the chess pieces are. Chinese chess has 90 grids, chess only 64 grids, from the gap above the grid we can see that Chinese chess trend is more complex, the layout is more flexible, the use of space to form a new situation, this is one of the reasons why I think Chinese chess is more difficult than chess.

Second, the trend of Chinese chess is more complex, and it is more difficult to combine slag keys and dust

The trend between different chess pieces in Chinese chess is more complicated, and it is much more difficult to involve each other than chess, and Chinese chess has soldiers and cannons, but chess does not, and if there are two more things, the changes in chess will be more complex and more difficult, which is the reason why I think Chinese Liangxiang chess is more difficult.

3. The rules of chess are more complicated, which is more difficult than that of Chinese chess

The rules of Chinese chess are actually very simple, as long as you understand them well for a long time, you will basically learn them, the rules of chess are more complicated, and most people will learn for a long time to understand, and from the point of view of the rules, chess is more difficult.

I think Chinese chess is more difficult, and Chinese chess is broad and profound, which can be said to be amazing.

Of course, the difficulty of Chinese chess will be a little higher, because the rules of Chinese chess are very difficult to understand, and there are many kinds of routines and bad arguments, so it will be more difficult.

I think Chinese chess is more difficult, because the connotation of Chinese chess is relatively deep, and I have been exposed to it, and it is really difficult.

Chess. This one is a bit more difficult, and it's really not easy to learn chess well in the international arena.

It's hard to do both. Chess varies a lot, but the territory is small. The middle elephant has a large territory.

Compared to Chinese chess and chess, I think Chinese chess is more difficult.

I can read international chess, but I can't read Chinese chess, and many people say I'm weird, but after writing down the appearance and rules of chess, he really argues quite simply with a high stool.

In competitive games, the opponents are people, not the tools of the game. Winning a sprint title is just as difficult as a long-distance running title.

There aren't many chess skills.

There are a few people who have played chess