IS INTEL XEON PROCESSOR BETTER THAN PENTIUM 4

It should be, because Xeon is designed for servers;

You can simply think: the server is a powerful PC, and of course this.

The analogy is not quite appropriate, it is just for understanding.

Wilametle Core:

Where, , is the Northwood core;

All of the above are 478 pins;

Northwood Core:

Pentium4 where, , is the Prescott core;

Pentium4 EE is a Prescott 2M core; 775 pins;

Pentium4 EE is the galatin core; 478 pins;

The following Pentium4 CPU is Galatin Core, 775 pins:

Pentium4 EE, Pentium4 EEPENTIUM4 is a Prescott core, 775 pins;

The following Pentium4 CPU models are no longer named after how many hertz they are clocked in, they are all Prescott cores or Cedar Mill cores, 775 pins

pentium4 505 ，505j , 506 , 511 , 515 , 515j , 516 , 517 , 519j , 519k , 520 ,520j , 521 ,530 ,530j ,531 ,540 , 550 ,50j ,551 ,560 ,561 ,570j ,571, 620 ,630 ,631 ,633,640,641,643,650,651,653,660,661,662,663,670,671，672,673

Classification: No classification.

Problem description: Intel processor: Why is the Core processor more expensive than the Pentium IV, and where is it?

I think the Core one is more expensive than the Pentium four-belt hyper-threaded one. Isn't it true that the higher the GHz, the faster things can be processed? The better?

Isn't it? Is there also the factor of the front-side bus (the core is 1066MHz for the front-side bus and 800MHz for the Pentium Four).

Another question: the dual-core one is also more expensive than the Pentium IV mentioned above (dual-core why?). I thought that the higher the GHz of the processor, the faster it is, the better it is, and the higher the price, but I think I'm wrong.

But where is Core vs dual-core better than Pentium? Can I learn more about being a computer whiz? Thank you.

Analysis: Among the CPUs currently produced by Intel, Pentium 4, PentiumD, and Celeron are for PCs, and Xeon, XeonMP, and Italy are for workstations and servers. Italy is a completely different 64-bit CPU from other CPUs and is not designed to be used in existing Windows applications.

Other processors differ in terms of maximum operating frequency, f** FSB frequency, and cache capacity, but the internal design is basically the same, while ensuring software compatibility.

The biggest difference between Pentium 4 (Celeron) and Xeon (Xeon) is that Xeon can build multiprocessor systems, while P4 cannot. Only one CPU can be used in a system built by P4, Xeon can build a dual-processor system with 2 CPUs, and XeonMP can use more than 4 CPUs to build a system.

Multiprocessor systems can be used for high-speed applications such as 3D graphics production and animation file encoding, as well as for high-load, high-speed applications such as database processing in servers. In addition, the P4 is available in a 478-pin package and the Xeon is available in a 604-pin package, and the chipsets that support them are different, so they cannot be used interchangeably.

AMD also manufactures Athlon's MP processors for workstations and servers. Its internal design is basically the same as that of the Athlon's XP, but it supports dual CPUs. In addition, CPUs such as SUN's UltraSPARC and IBM's Power are also server-oriented CPUs that can form multiprocessor systems, but they are not compatible with Intel and AMD CPUs in software and hardware.

Dual-core CPU is like integrating two CPUs into one CPU, one is used for two, for example, one core is used at 100%, and the other core can process other data, so it won't be very stuck, if it's not dual-core, I think the CPU is used 100%, and the other programs are almost slow.

Good core.

There are also the following differences between Xeon and Core:

1. Xeon is a CPU for servers, with larger caches and stronger stability, and some server-specific instruction sets with large data throughput. The Core i-series is a desktop-class CPU.

2. The performance is not much different from the ordinary core, at least it is disproportionate to the huge gap in **.

3. Xeon processors do not have integrated graphics cores, while the Core i series has integrated graphics.

The two sets actually serve different purposes:

The Core i is a civilian series, and the Xeon is a server series. Many of their features are different, but the most important and simplest performance differences can be roughly understood.

Here we only talk about the core of the desktop part, because after all, it corresponds to the Xeon on the server side. Core i3 i5 i7 mainstream models in 2 4 cores (i7 high-end series not counted), three slow in 3MB-8MB, i3 for dual-core four-thread, i5 for four-core four-thread, i7 for four-core eight-thread, their single-core performance is generally better, because the use is civilian, the use of all kinds of special software and games is the main one.

Xeon E3 E5 E7 is quite different, E3 is very close to i7, the same is four cores and eight threads, the frequency is generally lower than i7, equivalent to the cost-effective version of i7, in the 4th generation and before, E3 is very popular with the installation party.

E5 and sliding chain E7 cache is very large, in addition to individual models, they have a large number of cores, for example, E7 8890V4 The number of cores has reached 24, 48 threads, L3=60MB, the main frequency is relatively low, because its purpose is a server, multitasking is more important, playing an interstellar 2 game, i3 6100 is much easier to use than it.

So far, the Pentium 4 processor has a total of three different cores: Willamette, Northwood, and Prescott. Among them, the Williamette core belongs to the earliest products of Pentium 4, which are manufactured using micron technology, and the representative products are P4 and P4. Because it generates a lot of heat, it's difficult to ramp up the frequency, and the L2 cache is only 256kb, the overall performance is not ideal, especially for overclockers.

As a result, Intel quickly developed Northwood's core products to meet the needs of consumers. The Northwood core Pentium 4 is built in a micron process, which has a big jump in clock speed compared to the Willamette core processor, and the L2 cache has also doubled from 256K to 512KB. <>

In order to distinguish it from the original Pentium 4, which has the same clock speed but only has 256KB of L2 cache, Intel has added a capital letter "A" to the end of its model number, such as "P4", to indicate that the new product has 512KB of L2 cache. These products all have only a 400MHz front-side bus. <>