Urgently need an essay that makes arguments and uses metaphors!

Examples of figurative and analogical arguments are:

1. Argument by analogy.

In Mr. Lu Xun's article "Take-it-ism", Nietzsche is not the sun, nor does it have endless light and heat, and by analogy, China is not the sun, nor does it have endless light and heat, and it is impossible to blindly give, unless China is crazy like Nietzsche.

2. Figurative argument.

The Whistle argues the argument by using the "whistle", a physical object in life, as a metaphor for the things that many people pursue and whose value is misappraised, and people pay too high a price for the "whistle".

The difference between the two. An analogical argument is a comparison of two things with the same properties. Figurative argument is an argumentation method that uses familiar and understandable concrete things to prove people's unfamiliar and incomprehensible abstract truths.

The basis of analogical argument is analogical reasoning, which should start from the facts, return to the facts, and be tested by the facts.

The basis of figurative argument is the figurative case, which is not necessarily real, and can reasonably imagine and fabricate a certain situation or image. Analogical arguments focus on the logic and rigor of reasoning. Figurative arguments, on the other hand, focus on the figurative and concrete embodiment of reasoning.

1. I am very ordinary, and I am very ordinary. I am one of countless stars, but I am proud of my light today; I am a bud on the earth, and although it is not fragrant and dazzling, I am proud of the opening that is coming. I am ordinary, but ordinary and valuable; I am ordinary, but ordinary with dignity!

2. Human nature is like wild flowers and plants, and learning is like pruning and transplanting.

3. The crab is six kneeling and two chela, and there is no sustenance in the cave of the non-snake eel, and the heart is also restless.

Figurative argument refers to the method of argumentation that uses the reason of the parabler to demonstrate the reason of the analogue. Between two things, there is only a need for similarities to be used as a metaphor for one thing for another, thus demonstrating a more abstract matter. It is a special method of argumentation.

The analogy between the parabler and the analogized is the same. Only when there are differences in class can we make a parable; Only when the reason is the same can we reason and argue. It has both similarities and differences with rhetorical figurative and analogical arguments.

The analogy is different, which is the same as the analogy; The same reason is different from a metaphor that does not have an argumentative effect. The principle is the same, which is the same as the analogical argument; However, it only requires that the truth of the truth does not have to be the truth of the event, which is different from the analogical argument.

1. Argument by analogy.

In Mr. Lu Xun's article "Take-it-ism", Nietzsche is not the sun, nor is there endless light and heat, and by analogy, China is not the sun, nor is there endless light and heat, and it is impossible to blindly give, unless China is as crazy as Nietzsche. It can be seen that the object thing plays the role of confirming certain properties of the subject thing in the argument, and then proving the argument.

2. Figurative argument.

The Whistle argues the argument by using the "whistle", a physical object in life, as a metaphor for the things that many people pursue and whose value is misappraised, and people pay too high a price for the "whistle". In this way, the argument is made simple and thorough, easy to understand, and more persuasive through metaphorical argumentation.

1. The author uses metaphors to reason. For example, "Gai's natural talent is like a natural flower, and then you know how to prune and transfer it when you read a book" to illustrate the effect of reading on people's talents. It is written in this way, vividly and easily understood.

2. The author uses rankings to reason. For example, "Reading is enough to be enjoyable, enough to gamble, enough to grow talented." Its pleasantness is also most seen in solitude; Its gambling is also most seen in the high-minded talk; His long talent is also the most seen in the judgment of the world. ”

Another example is, "Reading history makes people wise, reading poetry makes people beautiful, mathematics makes people thorough, science makes people profound, ethics makes people dignified, and the study of logic and rhetoric makes people good at argumentation." Written in this way, the truth of the speech is very open-minded, and the reading is full of momentum, which enhances the persuasiveness and appeal.

3. The author uses comparative reasoning. After saying the positive, and then speaking from the negative, the reasoning will be more comprehensive and powerful. For example, the article begins with a positive description of the purpose of reading, and then goes on to describe the three biases of reading from the negative side.

For another example, the last level of the article first says that reading can shape people's character from the positive side, and then says that reading can make up for this pure and boring defect of character and spirit from the negative side.