Off campus training chaos is frequent, how should off campus training institutions rectify it?

A large part of the employment enterprises of educated fresh college students are education and training institutions, and if you think about the college students who have just entered the society, they have to educate others, so the quality of this education can be imagined. And as far as I know, many educational institutions recruit people who are studying in college, or who do not have much cultural accumulation at all, I am not saying that people who do not have a diploma will not be able to improve their education level, but an educational diploma can indeed ensure the quality of education in an educational institution to a certain extent. <>

Not only that, now many educational institutions are to put it bluntly is to circle money, first of all, they use the parents unilaterally want to pay for their children such a psychology, and strive to instigate parents to pay for their children to go to a variety of tutoring classes, in order to reassure parents, he will let parents sign what contract, if it does not achieve the effect, the money will be returned, but the actual operation is completely different, and finally parents take this contract to ask for an explanation, they will only solve this kind of thing with a prevarication attitude. Although there are many well-known educational institutions that are doing well, most of them are very expensive, so to speak, if you want to get rich and start a business, you can set up an educational institution. <>

Those who do not have much financial reserves and want to improve their professional quality, or some technical level, will choose some new educational institutions, but such institutions lack a guarantee, which will form a vicious circle, more and more people will invest in the industry to provide unprofessional education. Not only that, many people invest in this education industry, just to make money quickly, then they lose their original intention of education, and this will also lead to the teachers who educate these children will be batch after batch, and the replacement rate is too high, which is very detrimental to the growth and development of children. <>

In response to this chaos, first of all, the relevant organsIt is necessary to close down certain educational institutions that do not comply with the rules and regulations, to tighten the rules and regulations of educational institutions, not only that, for the relevant handling of educational institutions, the relevant ** to send personnel to carry out oneReal-time supervision, and thenOpen complaint channels,Let those parents and friends who have no way to complain and be deceived can talk about their experiences.

First of all, it should be strengthened on the side of the Education Bureau, set up a reporting system, and severely punish after it is discovered, so as to make an example of the chickens and monkeys.

For example, some unqualified training institutions should be canceled immediately, and they should not be allowed to apply for certificates, which will suppress a number of unqualified training institutions.

It is necessary to strictly crack down on such institutions, make relevant regulations on this, and strictly investigate and deal with whether they conform to the state's regulations.

As for the rectification of off-campus institutions, parents believe that it is most necessary to strengthen the inspection of off-campus institutions and standardize the establishment of standards. In addition, parents also believe that it is also effective measures to standardize the scope of commercial cooperation between schools and extracurricular institutions and strengthen the construction of parents' correct educational concepts and ideas.

All off-campus training institutions use the State Administration for Market Regulation of the Ministry of Education's "Off-campus Training Service Contract for Primary and Secondary School Students (Model Text)", and it is strictly forbidden to use unfair format terms to infringe upon the lawful rights and interests of students.

Nowadays, there are too many training institutions on the market, and if you don't keep your eyes open, you will be deceived; Legal off-campus training institutions must have a school license, a fire certificate, whether it meets the scope of the license, whether the teachers can keep up, etc.!

With the development of the times, the learning pressure of primary school students is also increasing, I deeply remember that when I was in primary school, the study time was not as much as my time to play, and now primary school students even have to come to a set of questions before going to bed, which invisibly increases the pressure of learning for children, and bears the pain that should not be borne at this age. What do you think of the Education Bureau's vigorous governance and rectification of off-campus training institutions? I support this kind of rectification, parents nowadays always hope that their children can learn more things, and enroll their children in various tutoring classes after school, which will only add too much pressure to their children and make them suffer too much.

One. Learning should be a combination of work and rest.

Nowadays, many parents let their children develop a variety of skills outside of school, and there is nothing wrong with this idea, but children cannot be deprived of time to relax, children are not tools for learning, they also have their own thoughts and their own time. We all know that learning should be a combination of work and rest, and developing their skills may give them one more chance to survive later in life, but it is also appropriate to let them relax themselves. Nowadays, many out-of-school tutoring classes are particularly expensive, which not only puts a lot of pressure on children, but also on parents.

Give your children a holiday so they can have their own birthdays. <>

Two. Children want to have a happy childhood.

Everyone may deeply understand this phenomenon, that is, the teacher assigns homework to parents after school, and asks parents to correct their children's homework and guide their children to do homework, which not only increases the burden on children, but also increases homework for parents. Sending children to school is to hope that the children can learn something in school, and when they come home, they don't expect to teach their children to learn every day, and they have to work during the day and be a teacher at night, which is very hard to think about. It is necessary to reduce the amount of homework and reduce the amount of time that children spend in tutoring classes.

The above is just a personal opinion, so what do you think of this rectification?

What are the breeding grounds for off-campus training institutions? Everyone knows what the reason is. The education department asks the school for grades, and the school asks the teacher for the grades, and in turn the teacher asks the student for the grade.

How do students want grades, of course, they ask their parents for grades, and parents are speechless and have to ask for grades from off-campus training institutions. Students have good academic performance, students are proud, teachers are honored, parents have face, classes can become excellent class teachers, and schools can get advanced units to take out awards and cash, why not? One is prosperous and the other is lost, and people have no interests, how can they get up early and not be fools.

The early hype of off-campus training institutions, coupled with the mercenary efforts of individual people in our teacher department, and the loss of teacher morality, thus forming today's vicious circle situation, is really to the point where it must be changed.

I think that the Education Bureau's behavior is very correct, and it can also promote the development of the education industry, and it can also avoid the situation of mixing up the off-campus training institutions, and it is also responsible for students and parents.

The students that the school teachers have worked hard to train according to the national education syllabus have become their educational achievements and products to make money from the society when the training institutions change their packaging, and the school teachers have become the volunteer workers of the training institutions. The existence of training institutions is a devastation to the national compulsory education system and must be eradicated. Otherwise, the compulsory education system will be destroyed by the training institutions!

It can ensure that education is more standardized, and it can also punish some bad behaviors, so that people can better train, improve students' academic performance, and there will be no bad atmosphere, which requires these institutions to be formal and standardized.

I think this approach is very correct, because there are too many off-campus training institutions now, and they are too chaotic, and they need to be properly managed.

I think the Education Bureau is very correct in doing this, because many training institutions outside the school are indeed very rampant, and their fees are also very high, and they should be severely cracked down.

The national policy of double reduction must be implemented as soon as possible, and the whole country must spare no effort to conscientiously implement the content of the document from top to bottom, completely expel the capital predators from the education industry, transform off-campus education and training institutions into non-profit institutions, severely punish teachers for any make-up classes outside the school, and return our Chinese education to a pure land!

You think too much, the Ministry of Education has their plans and plans, you are just a little ant, it is not your turn to control the entire education system, you are in the red red rich people to tutor, red eyes red training to make money.

Hahaha, the above few people are all in a unified voice? Even it's pretty much the same! Can you bring me one next time!

How to see? Lie flat and see.

YesThe governance of off-campus training institutions is a matter of concern, public concern, and social concern, and it is also the annual key work of the Ministry of Education. Since the beginning of this year, all localities have intensified their efforts to govern off-campus training institutions. 3 penalties within 17 days, regardless of the size of the institution, covering online and offline.

Since late April, Beijing has successively launched a set of "combination punches" in response to the chaos of off-campus training institutions.

On April 23, the Beijing Municipal Education Commission notified four online training institutions of illegal enrollment fees; On May 7, the Beijing Municipal Education Commission issued the "Notice on Problems Found in the Inspection of Off-campus Training Institutions during the May Day Period";

On May 10, the Price Supervision and Competition Bureau of the State Administration for Market Regulation and the Beijing Municipal Administration for Market Regulation launched a joint operation to impose a maximum penalty of warning and a fine of 2.5 million yuan on the two training institutions.

Multi-department collaboration to fill regulatory gaps

Beijing's round of off-campus training institutions has a high level of governance. The Municipal Education Commission takes the lead, and the cooperating units also include municipal administrative departments such as market supervision and internet information. The points selected for governance include not only hardware issues such as enrollment fees, advertising, and classroom safety environment, but also teaching organization issues such as course teachers, teaching content, and class time, which basically cover all points where off-campus training institutions come into contact with parents and students.

In the specific implementation, it not only pays attention to illegal acts in cyberspace, but also dispatches inspection teams to investigate and deal with on-site problems on the spot.

The different management functions of the municipal administrative departments focus on the governance of off-campus training institutions, which fills the gap that the education department cannot substantively supervise off-campus training institutions whose actual identity is an enterprise in the past. On May 10, the State Administration for Market Regulation's Price Supervision and Competition Bureau and the Beijing Municipal Administration for Market Regulation imposed maximum penalties on the two training institutions.

Now look at it, we have to take the chaos of off-campus training institutions seriously.

Is the chaos of education governance and off-campus training institutions real? Is it real? This doesn't have to be real because a lot of kids really need out-of-school tutoring, well, in. In class, he didn't fully understand that he could go to an off-campus tutorial class, so he didn't need to be serious.

Legal analysis: the "double reduction" policy has clearly destroyed the focus of both work inside and outside the school In the era when off-campus training institutions are blooming everywhere, the "double reduction" policy must not only take into account the education in the school, but also need to be considered in and out of the school. From the perspective of the school, the most important thing is undoubtedly to improve the quality of teaching and service.

Legal basis: Education Law of the People's Republic of China Article 6: Education shall persist in cultivating morality, strengthen education on the core socialist values for the educated, and enhance the educated's sense of social responsibility, innovative spirit, and practical ability.

The State conducts education in patriotism, collectivism, and socialism with Chinese characteristics among the educated, as well as education in ideals, morality, discipline, rule of law, national defense, and national unity.

There are many off-campus training institutions, and the regulation of off-campus training institutions still requires relevant first-class authorities to issue relevant policies, and the current relevant policies stipulate that off-campus training institutions must set up fixed places that must meet safety conditions, and the average area of students in the same training period is not less than 3 square meters; There must be a relatively stable teaching team, in-service teachers in primary and secondary schools shall not be employed, and there are teachers engaged in relevant subject knowledge training should have corresponding teacher qualifications, and there must be standardized regulations and corresponding management systems, so now the off-campus institutions are still relatively formal.

It should be strictly checked whether the off-campus training institutions have business licenses, and whether the teachers in the inspectors have teaching qualification certificates

As a college student, I deeply understand the pressure brought by off-campus cultural tutoring classes.

I support the abolition of all extracurricular cultural classes and tutorial classes and return to school, because now the education is very rich, and students can learn a lot of things, but the generation of students' parents does not have this superior life, so now parents are pinning their hopes on their children and constantly putting pressure on them, especially in the year of my college entrance examination, the number of exams was nearly 10 million. It is precisely because of this situation that student education has gradually appeared involution, the pressure of students is very large, the involution of primary and secondary education is more serious, extracurricular cram schools are very flooded, parents arrange all the rest time of students to arrange extracurricular tutoring classes, but in this case, some students' grades have not improved, and the old cover has regressed. The only way to completely change this situation is to reduce the pressure on students to go on to higher education, rather than blindly demanding students' grades.

According to reports, recently, the General Office of the Ministry of Education, the General Office of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the General Office of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, and the General Office of the State Administration for Industry and Commerce jointly issued the "Notice on Effectively Reducing the Extracurricular Burden of Primary and Secondary School Students and Carrying out Special Governance Actions for Extracurricular Training Institutions".

According to the report, the relevant person in charge said that in recent years, off-campus training institutions have developed rapidly, which has met the supplementary needs of some primary and secondary school students for learning to a certain extent. However, the current situation of extracurricular training is not optimistic, and some training institutions carry out "test-oriented" training, which violates the laws of education and the laws of youth growth and development, affects the normal education and teaching order of schools, causes excessive extracurricular burdens on students, increases the economic burden of families, and has strong social repercussions.

In order to quickly curb the current outstanding problems, in accordance with the "Education Law", "Compulsory Education Law", "Private Education Promotion Law" and other legal provisions and the national curriculum plan and curriculum standards, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, and the State Administration for Industry and Commerce have decided to jointly carry out special governance actions to protect the rights and interests of students in accordance with the law, resolutely deal with behaviors that violate the laws of education and teaching and the laws of adolescent growth, promote the resolution of the problem of excessive extracurricular burdens on primary and secondary school students, and ensure the healthy growth of primary and secondary school students.

Hopefully, the action will bear fruit soon!